溢出效应下电商平台制造商生态标签“漂绿”行为的演化及扩散
Evolution and Diffusion of “Greenwashing” Behavior of E-Commerce Platform Manufacturers’ Ecological Labels under Spillover Effects
摘要: 电商平台在推动绿色消费方面成效显著,但其生态标签体系正面临严峻挑战。现实中,当部分制造商的“漂绿”行为被曝光时,消费者往往会对整个生态标签体系产生信任危机,导致所有贴标产品的市场接受度下降,然而,这种“连带效应”不仅未能有效遏制“漂绿”行为,反而使合规制造商为失信者买单,造成“劣币驱逐良币”的市场扭曲,最终削弱了平台经济绿色发展。为探明消费者信任危机下对平台制造商绿色生产决策的影响,本研究构建了制造商间绿色生产决策交互的演化博弈模型。通过分析系统均衡点的存在性及稳定性,并结合数值仿真,揭示了负外部溢出效应下平台制造商绿色生产的演化模式。研究发现:(1) 平台制造商初始选择“绿色生产”策略的比例与系统朝向期望方向演化的程度呈正相关;(2) 消费者因漂绿行为导致的平台绿色产品信任度下降,引发制造商间的负外部溢出效应,致使绿色生产制造商逐渐转向“漂绿”策略以获取市场份额和利润,最终导致系统陷入“不良”状态;(3) 平台制造商绿色协同收益(S)、漂绿行为被发现后的直接经济损失(F)及发现概率的提升,可促使系统从“漂绿生产”的不良锁定状态向“绿色生产”的预期状态演化。
Abstract: E-commerce platforms have achieved significant results in promoting green consumption, but their ecological labeling system is facing severe challenges. In reality, when the “greenwashing” behavior of some manufacturers is exposed, consumers often experience a crisis of trust in the entire ecological labeling system, leading to a decrease in market acceptance of all labeled products. However, this “cascading effect” not only fails to effectively curb greenwashing behavior, but also makes compliant manufacturers pay for dishonest individuals, resulting in a market distortion of “bad money driving out good money” and ultimately weakening the green development of the platform economy. To investigate the impact of consumer trust crisis on platform manufacturers’ green production decisions, this study constructed an evolutionary game model of green production decision interaction among manufacturers. By analyzing the existence and stability of the equilibrium point in the system, and combining it with numerical simulation, the evolution mode of green production by platform manufacturers under negative external spillover effects is revealed. Research has found that: (1) the proportion of platform manufacturers initially choosing a “green production” strategy is positively correlated with the degree to which the system evolves towards the desired direction; (2) The decrease in trust in green products on the platform caused by consumer greenwashing behavior has triggered negative external spillover effects among manufacturers, leading green production manufacturers to gradually shift to a “greenwashing” strategy to gain market share and profits, ultimately resulting in the system falling into a “bad” state; (3) The green collaborative benefits (S) of platform manufacturers, the direct economic losses (F) after the discovery of greenwashing behavior, and the increase in detection probability can promote the system to evolve from the adverse locking state of “greenwashing production” to the expected state of “green production”.
文章引用:邓冉冉. 溢出效应下电商平台制造商生态标签“漂绿”行为的演化及扩散[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 1268-1283. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113560

参考文献

[1] 韩小雅, 杨鑫源, 张会臣. 碳交易政策下绿色平台供应链系统优化策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2025, 45(2): 398-412.
[2] 王利莎, 王子琳, 王永昭. 平台生态标签情境下的漂绿行为演化与监管研究[J/OL]. 管理评论: 1-13. 2024-10-14.[CrossRef
[3] 梅强, 仲晶晶, 张菁菁, 等. 溢出效应下集群企业安全生产决策的演化路径[J]. 系统管理学报, 2018, 27(1): 40-49, 56.
[4] Guo, X., Cheng, L. and Liu, J. (2019) Green Supply Chain Contracts with Eco-Labels Issued by the Sales Platform: Profitability and Environmental Implications. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 1485-1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 严双琪. 在市场竞争中绿色制造商的环境信息披露策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021.
[6] ISO 14063:2020 (En)Environmental Management—Environmental Communication—Guidelines and Examples.
[7] 赵连霞, 王芳晴, 张小峰, 等. 市场监管环境下考虑生态标签欺诈的双寡头竞争策略[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(12): 1865-1872.
[8] 杨德艳, 余云龙, 冯章伟. 消费者质疑行为下环境责任型制造商生态标签选择策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 38(11): 1-14.
[9] 杨德艳, 冯章伟, 余云龙. 基于消费者质疑的不同成本类型绿色产品生态标签选择策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(6): 1176-1189.
[10] Hamilton, S.F. and Zilberman, D. (2006) Green Markets, Eco-Certification, and Equilibrium Fraud. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52, 627-644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Otterstad, M.T. (2022) Exploring Sustainability in E-Commerce. Master’s Thesis, The University of Bergen.
[12] Salomone, R. (2023) Fast Fashion & Greenwashing: The Worst Combination for Sustainability. University of Messina.
[13] Markusen, A. (2017) Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts. In: Martin, R., Ed., Economy, Routledge, 177-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Carrie, A.S. (2000) From Integrated Enterprises to Regional Clusters: The Changing Basis of Competition. Computers in Industry, 42, 289-298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Porter, M.E. (1998) Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review.
[16] 吕君, 颜光华. 产业集群“溢出效应”研究——供应链视角[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2006(8): 33-37.