自拍杆专利无效案件对专利创造性判断的启示
Implications of the Selfie Stick Patent Invalidation Case for the Judgment of Patent Inventiveness
摘要: 虽然专利法对专利创造性做出了比较明确的规定,但在实际操作中,由于技术的复杂性和多样性,以及判断主体的主观性,专利创造性的判断仍然存在诸多争议。本文通过对自拍杆专利无效案件的研究,探讨技术领域对专利创造性的判断的影响,为完善专利创造性的判断标准和方法提供参考。
Abstract: Although the Patent Law clearly stipulates patent inventiveness, in practical operation, there are still many disputes over the judgment of patent inventiveness due to the complexity and diversity of technologies as well as the subjectivity of the judging bodies. By studying the selfie stick patent invalidation case, this paper explores the impact of technical fields on the judgment of patent inventiveness, aiming to provide references for improving the standards and methods of patent inventiveness judgment.
文章引用:徐桂华. 自拍杆专利无效案件对专利创造性判断的启示[J]. 法学, 2025, 13(11): 2612-2617. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.1311356

参考文献

[1] 鄢功军. 创造性判断过程中“技术问题”对技术启示判断的重要性[J]. 专利代理, 2024(1): 63-67.
[2] 王彦华, 姜涛. 发明专利创造性审查中结合启示的判断[J]. 专利代理, 2021(3): 94-97.
[3] 郭丹丹. 浅谈专利创造性判断中的结合启示[J]. 科技创新与生产力, 2024, 45(8): 15-18.
[4] 何婷婷, 郭涛. 创造性评述中如何正确判断技术启示[J]. 中国科技信息, 2022(6): 15-17.
[5] 李莉, 陆颖. 探讨使用三步法判定专利创造性时如何避免主观性植入[J]. 专利代理, 2023(4): 71-76.
[6] 李伟伟, 王辉. 创造性判断的几个关键问题[J]. 专利代理, 2021(4): 64-69.
[7] 杨眉, 苏余鹏, 高思洋, 等. 创造性评判中关于不同技术领域的技术启示的思考[J]. 现代经济信息, 2018(16): 339-340, 342.