证据保全制度完善路径研究
Research on the Improvement Path of the Evidence Preservation System
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.14111041, PDF,   
作者: 毕慧珍:江西理工大学法学院,江西 赣州
关键词: 民事诉讼保全程序证据保全Civil Litigation Conservatory Proceedings Evidence Preservation
摘要: 为了提升诉讼效率并追求实体公正,我国引入了证据保全制度,并通过司法解释进一步细化了相关规则。然而,经过十余年的司法实践检验,该制度的实施效果并不理想。主要问题在于立法规定过于原则化,缺乏可操作性。具体而言,存在的问题包括适用范围单一、管辖规则不明确、一味参照财产保全等方面,这些问题制约了证据保全制度功能的实现。为确保证据保全制度的设计适应实际,有必要对现有立法进行修订,增强制度的可操作性,以满足司法实践的需要。
Abstract: In order to enhance the efficiency of litigation and the pursuit of substantive justice, my country introduced the system of evidence preservation, and through judicial interpretation to further refine the relevant rules. However, after more than ten years of judicial practice test, the implementation of the system is not ideal. The main problem lies in the overly principled nature and lack of operability of the legislative provisions. Specifically, the problems include a single scope of application, unclear jurisdictional rules, always referring to the preservation of property, etc., which constrain the realization of the function of the evidence preservation system. In order to ensure that the design of the evidence preservation system is adapted to actual practice, it is necessary to revise the existing legislation and enhance the operability of the system to meet the needs of judicial practice.
文章引用:毕慧珍. 证据保全制度完善路径研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(11): 659-665. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14111041

参考文献

[1] 王福华. 民事诉讼的社会化[J]. 中国法学, 2018(1): 28-52.
[2] 许少波. 论民事起诉前之证据收集[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2014, 32(1): 194-200.
[3] 王国征. 我国诉前证据保全制度的再完善[J]. 湘江法律评论, 2014(1): 296-307.
[4] 德国民事诉讼法典[M]. 赵秀举, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021.
[5] 日本民事诉讼法典[M]. 曹云吉, 译. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2017.
[6] 占善刚. 证据保全“保全化”之反思[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(2): 89-99.
[7] 占善刚. 证据保全程序参照适用保全程序质疑——《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第81条第3款检讨[J]. 法商研究, 2015, 32(6): 121-127.
[8] 段文波, 李凌. 证据保全的性质重识与功能再造[J]. 南京社会科学, 2017(5): 81-88.
[9] 袁中华. 民事证据收集制度之体系化[J]. 现代法学, 2024, 46(6): 31-43.
[10] 曹建军. 论强制型书证收集程序的竞合与选择[J]. 法学评论, 2022, 40(5): 78-88.
[11] 孔令章. 论法院诉前证据保全制度——借鉴德国独立证据调查程序的思考[J]. 现代法学, 2011, 33(3): 124-134.
[12] 谢登科. 电子数据冻结: 一种新兴的证据保全措施[J]. 东岳论丛, 2023, 44(6): 156-165, 192.