羞怯大学生对动态情绪面孔的注意偏向研究
A Study on the Attentional Bias of Shy College Students towards Dynamic Emotional Faces
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.1511617, PDF,   
作者: 卢婷婷, 杨美荣*, 李依繁, 闫小甜:华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院,河北 唐山
关键词: 羞怯眼动动态情绪面孔Shyness Eye Movements Dynamic Emotional Faces
摘要: 目的:采用眼动技术记录羞怯大学生对动态情绪面孔的注意偏向的眼动数据,考察高低羞怯大学生对动态情绪面孔注意偏向眼动指标的差异。结果:高羞怯大学生和低羞怯大学生在首视点潜伏期偏向分数上,被试类型与材料性质交互作用显著,在首视点定向注意偏向、首视点注视时间偏向分数、总注视时间偏向分数均存在显著差异并且被试类型与材料性质交互作用显著。结论:高羞怯大学生对负性动态面孔存在注意偏向,主要表现在高羞怯大学生对负性动态面孔存在最初的注意定向、早期注意加速探索和注意维持,以及总体注意维持,符合警觉假说。
Abstract: Purpose: Eye-tracking technology was employed to record the eye movement data of shy college students regarding their attentional bias towards dynamic emotional faces, in order to investigate the differences in eye movement indicators of attentional bias towards dynamic emotional faces between high-shyness and low-shyness college students. Results: In the bias score of first fixation latency, the interaction between participant type and stimulus material properties was significant. Significant differences were found in the bias scores for first fixation orientation, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration, and the interactions between participant type and stimulus material properties were also significant. Conclusion: High-shyness college students exhibit an attentional bias towards negative dynamic faces, mainly manifested in initial attentional orientation, accelerated early attentional engagement, attentional maintenance, and overall attentional maintenance towards negative dynamic faces. These findings support the vigilance hypothesis.
文章引用:卢婷婷, 杨美荣, 李依繁, 闫小甜 (2025). 羞怯大学生对动态情绪面孔的注意偏向研究. 心理学进展, 15(11), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.1511617

参考文献

[1] 高峰强, 高佳琳, 韩磊, 等(2014). 羞怯大学生情绪面孔注意偏向特点的眼动研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(2), 210-212+209.
[2] 刘俊材, 冉光明, 张琪, 等(2021). 中国大学生动态情绪面孔库的构建. 应用心理学, 27(3), 234-243.
[3] 苏君丽(2023). 大学生羞怯、自尊与社交焦虑的现状及关系研究. 湖州职业技术学院学报, 21(3), 9-12.
[4] 汤淑媛(2016). 羞怯个体对社交场景信息的认知加工. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[5] 武云鹏(2016). 社会评价情境中自我关注对初中生羞怯表现的作用. 博士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[6] 徐敏霞, 汪新建, 高峰强, 等(2022). 惩罚预期对羞怯个体注意偏向的影响. 心理科学, 45(5), 1144-1151.
[7] 郑成艳, 王哲, 严璘璘(2021). 眼动追踪技术的研究述评. 分析仪器, (2), 141-144.
[8] Abiodun, S. J., Salerno, J. M., McAllister, G. A., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Seaman, K. L. (2023). Adult Age Differences in Evoked Emotional Responses to Dynamic Facial Expressions. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 79, gbad141.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Brunet, P. M., Heisz, J. J., Mondloch, C. J., Shore, D. I., & Schmidt, L. A. (2009). Shyness and Face Scanning in Children. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 909-914.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Flade, F., & Imhoff, R. (2024). Closing a Conceptual Gap in Race Perception Research: A Functional Integration of the Other-Race Face Recognition and “Who Said What?” Paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127, 1-30.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Kapitanović, A., Tokić, A., & Šimić, N. (2023). Differences in the Recognition of Sadness, Anger, and Fear in Facial Expressions: The Role of the Observer and Model Gender. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 73, 308-313.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Li, R., Ran, G. M., & Zhang, Q. (2021). The Recognition of Dynamic-Emotional Faces in Individuals with High and Low Social Anxiety: An ERP Study. Neuroscience Letters, 768, Article ID: 136360.
[13] Wang, Q., Hu, C., Short, L. A., & Fu, G. (2018). The Influence of Shyness on the Scanning of Own-and Other-Race Faces in Adults. PLOS ONE, 7, e52203.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Weeks, J. W., & Howell, A. N. (2012). The Bivalent Fear of Evaluation Model of Social Anxiety: Further Integrating Findings on Fears of Positive and Negative Evaluation. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41, 83-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]