直播电商的金融支持模式与风险研究
Research on Financial Support Models and Risks in Live Streaming E-Commerce
摘要: 随着数字经济的快速发展,直播电商已成为连接生产与消费的重要新业态,其金融支持体系在推动产业扩张与价值创新中发挥着核心作用。本文基于金融功能演化视角,系统梳理了直播电商的金融支持模式演进逻辑与风险特征。研究发现,直播电商的金融支持经历了从“交易型金融”向“产业型金融”再到“资本化金融”的演变路径,实现了金融功能从支付结算到资本驱动的纵深拓展。在此过程中,支付嵌入、小额信贷、供应链金融及数据资本化成为金融服务的主要形态。与此同时,金融与产业深度融合也带来了信用、市场与操作等多维度风险,其形成机理主要源于信息不对称、技术适配不足与监管滞后。针对上述风险,本文提出了以“技术治理–制度监管–生态共治”为核心的防控框架,强调数据透明、智能风控、分级监管及多元共治的重要性。研究结论对完善直播电商金融体系、促进数字经济健康发展具有重要的理论价值与现实意义。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital economy, live streaming e-commerce has emerged as a vital new business format connecting production and consumption, with its financial support system playing a central role in driving industrial expansion and value innovation. From the perspective of financial function evolution, this paper systematically examines the evolutionary logic and risk characteristics of financial support models in live streaming e-commerce. The study finds that the financial support for live streaming e-commerce has evolved along the path of “transactional finance” to “industrial finance” and further to “capitalized finance,” achieving a deepening expansion of financial functions from payment and settlement to capital-driven mechanisms. Throughout this process, payment embedding, microcredit, supply chain finance, and data capitalization have become the primary forms of financial services. Meanwhile, the deep integration of finance and industry has introduced multidimensional risks, including credit, market, and operational risks, whose formation mechanisms primarily stem from information asymmetry, inadequate technological adaptation, and regulatory lag. In response to these risks, this paper proposes a prevention and control framework centered on “technological governance - institutional regulation - ecological co-governance,” emphasizing the importance of data transparency, intelligent risk control, tiered supervision, and multi-stakeholder co-governance. The research findings hold significant theoretical value and practical implications for improving the financial system of live streaming e-commerce and promoting the healthy development of the digital economy.
文章引用:姚红娇. 直播电商的金融支持模式与风险研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 1799-1805. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113623

参考文献

[1] 肖峰, 王继浛. 直播电商平台发展背景下的互联网金融挑战与应对[J]. 商场现代化, 2024(23): 35-37.
[2] 吴丁焱, 罗礼雄. 订单数据变融资“硬通货” [N]. 闽西日报, 2025-08-14(001).
[3] 龚强, 班铭媛, 张一林. 区块链、企业数字化与供应链金融创新[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(2): 22-34+3.
[4] 郑益. 跨境电商供应链金融模式设计与风险管控——以湖南嘉德集团为例[J]. 江苏商论, 2025(9): 26-33.
[5] 寻舸. 跨境电商发展的多元化金融支持[J]. 中国外资, 2024(19): 112-116.
[6] 陈毅捷. 数据资本化: 高质量数据资产上市的全面分析[J]. 商业观察, 2025, 11(22): 58-61+68.
[7] 刘赛红, 汤莎. 数据要素资本化的运行逻辑、产业赋能与风险控制[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2025, 41(10): 60-71.
[8] 郑令晗, 欧阳婷婷. 电子商务虚假信用评价的裁判尺度研究[J]. 山东工商学院学报, 2024, 38(6): 83-93.
[9] 李儒雅. 基于供应链金融的农业中小企业的融资困境及对策研究[J]. 中国农业会计, 2025, 35(16): 102-104.
[10] 虞海波. 直播电商的意识形态风险防范[J]. 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 48(5): 40-45.
[11] 邓浏睿, 喻喜沩, 张莹. 基于区块链的电商平台双渠道运营优化——进驻模式、绿色创新与融资策略的协同机制[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 39(4): 68-81.
[12] 王军, 赵成国, 胡磊, 等. 互联网金融平台间信用风险传染模型构建与实证研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021, 51(14): 20-30.
[13] 张鹏飞, 江岸, 廖福保. 智能合约驱动的数据共享质量竞拍激励机制[J]. 信息系统工程, 2025(9): 55-58.
[14] 王之熙, 仲余年. 对“直播带货”电子商务经营行为监管的思考[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2020(5): 35-37.
[15] 刘辉, 唐毅. 加密货币统合规制论: 基于监管沙箱的原理[J]. 数字经济与法治, 2024(2): 88-111+244.