跨学科视角下中考英语试题研究文献综述
A Literature Review on English Test Questions of the Senior High School Entrance Examination from an Interdisciplinary Perspective
摘要: 本研究对近十年来国内外跨学科视角下的中考英语试题进行了系统性综述,重点分析了三个方向:跨学科发展、跨学科教学以及跨学科试题。通过文献分析,笔者发现国际研究在理论构建和实证方面较为深入,而国内研究则更侧重政策落实与教学实践。现有研究普遍存在的两个挑战是:一是跨学科内容与英语测试结合不够紧密,二是量化研究方法运用较少。基于上述发现,笔者尝试从理论、方法和实践三个维度提出改进建议,旨在为中考英语命题改革提供新的思路,同时为实际教学带来有价值的参考。
Abstract: This study systematically combs and reviews domestic and international research on English test questions of the Senior High School Entrance Examination (SHSEE) from an interdisciplinary perspective over the past decade, focusing on three core directions: interdisciplinary theoretical foundations, interdisciplinary teaching practices, and interdisciplinary test question design. Literature analysis reveals that international academia has advanced in-depth theoretical construction and empirical research in this field, while domestic studies focus more on the implementation of policy requirements and integration with front-line teaching practices. Two key challenges are commonly observed in existing research: first, insufficient integration between interdisciplinary content and English testing objectives; second, the low proportion of quantitative research methods applied in studies. Based on these findings, this study proposes improvement suggestions from three dimensions—theoretical enhancement, methodological innovation, and practical optimization—aiming to provide new insights for the reform of the SHSEE English test proposition and valuable references for practical teaching.
文章引用:黄哲, 刘瑶瑶. 跨学科视角下中考英语试题研究文献综述[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(11): 560-565. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.1311904

参考文献

[1] Woodworth, R.S. and Thorndike, E.L. (1901) The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function Upon the Efficiency of Other Functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Stanford University Design School (2016) Design Thinking and Leadership Curriculum Framework. Stanford Design School Press, 7-45.
[3] Klein, J.T. (2000) A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science. In: Stehr, N. and Weingart, P., Eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity, University of Toronto Press, 3-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Knight, S., Coates, J.K., Lathlean, J. and Perez-del-Aguila, R. (2023) The Development of an Interdisciplinary Theoretical Framework for Forest School in the United Kingdom. British Educational Research Journal, 50, 905-922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Hayes, M. and Cejnar, L. (2020) Evaluating Alternative Work-Integrated Learning Opportunities: Student Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Industry-Based Projects. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Strömmer, K. and Ormiston, J. (2022) Forward-Looking Impact Assessment—An Interdisciplinary Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, Article 134322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 金吾伦. 跨学科研究引论[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 1997.
[8] 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993(2): 11-18, 4.
[9] 杜俊民. 交叉科学时代的交叉教育[J]. 社会科学, 2000(3): 50-54.
[10] 张华. 论理解本位跨学科学习[J]. 基础教育课程, 2018(22): 7-13.
[11] 马永红, 张晓会. 跨学科的内涵、机理及衍变路径[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2023, 44(1): 30-37.
[12] Finnish National Board of Education (2014) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Opetushallitus, 22-30.
[13] OSTP (2018) Charting a Course for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education. The White House, Chapters 1-5.
[14] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育英语课程标准(2022年版) [S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
[15] 北京市教育委员会. 关于加强新时代中小学科学教育工作的二十条措施[Z]. 北京市人民政府网: 第3条、第8条. 2025.
[16] 赵学纲. 学习任务群视角下小学语文跨学科学习路径变革[C]//中国企业文化促进会职业教育专业委员会. 教育驱动建筑工程企业文化创新可持续发展研讨会论文集(方法创新专题). 2025: 340-342.
[17] 于丽凡. 以跨学科实践锻造教师“六边形”胜任力[J]. 教育家, 2025(44): 62-63.
[18] The Douglas Fir Group (2016) A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Association of Language Testers in Europe (ALTE) (1997) Principles of Good Practice for ALTE Examinations: A Guide to Test Development and Examination Procedures. Council of Europe Publishing.
[20] Association of Language Testers in Europe (ALTE) (2008) Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). A Manual (Revised Edition), Cambridge University Press, 7-11.
[21] 张廷艳, 胡娜. 中国基础教育跨学科研究二十年: 总体态势、热点主题及变革趋势——基于中国知网(2000-2020年)载文分析[J]. 教育理论与实践: 2023, 43(5): 17-20.
[22] 黄凯, 张维忠. 中考数学试题中的跨学科内容分析——以2017年-2021年浙江省中考试题为例[J]. 中学数学教学参考, 2022(17): 53-55.
[23] 刘祖希. 关于数学跨学科内容与教学的已有研究——兼及2022年全国高考数学试卷跨学科试题分析[J]. 教育研究与评论(中学教育教学), 2022(12): 5-11.
[24] 宋亚杰, 胡雨宸. 例谈高考物理试题情境的科学性[J]. 物理教师, 2019, 40(6): 71-73.
[25] 邓天华, 傅敏. 从2022年高考试题看物理跨学科教学[J]. 物理教师, 2023, 44(1): 16-19.
[26] 杨希惠. 跨学科视角下中考化学试题评析——以2024年广东中考化学16题为例[J]. 理科考试研究, 2024, 31(24): 57-60.
[27] 敖杨. 跨学科视角下高考英语阅读文本分析——以2019-2023年全国卷为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 四川外国语大学, 2025.
[28] 沈奥, 曹慧媛. 高考英语试题的跨学科考查特点及备考建议[J]. 教学考试, 2025(21): 4-7.
[29] 刘巧. 高考英语试题的跨学科命题特点与备考建议[J]. 教学考试, 2025(12): 8-12.
[30] 李萍, 胡亚蓉, 徐倩, 张瑾, 李鹏. 落实立德树人根本任务 凸显英语学科育人价值——2022年山西省初中学业水平考试英语试题分析[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2022, 42(32): 3-7.
[31] 范月娥. 中考英语跨学科试题的命题分析与建议——以2024年广东省中考英语试题为例[C]//广东教育学会. 广东教育学会2025年度学术讨论会论文集(三). 东莞: 东城旗峰学校, 2025: 506-514.
[32] 辛键, 陈丽曼. 基于跨学科的小学英语纸笔测试中综合性题目的命制研究[J]. 中小学外语教学, 2025, 48(1): 59-64.