便携式电针仪治疗缺血性脑卒中后便秘的疗效观察

Observation on the Efficacy of Portable Electroacupuncture Apparatus in the Treatment of Constipation after Ischemic Stroke

摘要: 目的：比较便携式电针仪与传统电针仪治疗缺血性脑卒中后便秘的临床疗效观察。方法：将60位缺血性卒中后便秘患者随机分为对照组(14男，16女，脱落1例)与观察组(15男，15女)，所有参与者均接受缺血性卒中基础治疗与康复训练，针对常规穴位操作，对照组使用传统电针仪，观察组使用便携式电针仪每次留针30 min，每日两次，治疗4周。通过对比两组患者治疗后疗效指数，比较便携式电针仪与传统电针仪的临床疗效。结果：两组患者的一般资料比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05)，组间具有可比性，两组患者治疗后疗效比较对照组低于观察组，对照组治疗有效率为89.65%，观察组治疗有效率为96.66%，表明观察组优于对照组。结论：便携式电针仪治疗缺血性脑卒中后便秘疗效优于传统电针仪。

Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy of portable electroacupuncture apparatus and traditional electroacupuncture apparatus in the treatment of constipation after ischemic stroke. Methods: A total of 60 patients with constipation after ischemic stroke were randomly divided into a control group (14 males, 16 females, 1 case lost to follow-up) and an observation group (15 males, 15 females). All participants received basic treatment for ischemic stroke and rehabilitation training. The control group was treated with a traditional electroacupuncture apparatus at conventional acupoints, while the observation group was treated with a portable electroacupuncture apparatus, with the needle retained for 30 minutes each time, twice a day, for 4 weeks. The clinical efficacy of the two apparatuses was compared by analyzing the efficacy index of the two groups after treatment. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the general data between the two groups (P > 0.05), indicating comparability between the groups. After treatment, the efficacy of the control group was lower than that of the observation group: the effective rate was 89.65% in the control group and 96.66% in the observation group, showing that the observation group was superior to the control group. Conclusion: The portable electroacupuncture apparatus has better efficacy than the traditional electroacupuncture apparatus in the treatment of constipation after ischemic stroke.