新工科跨能力域计算思维教材开发与教学模式改革——“双一流”建设背景下
Development of Computational Thinking Textbooks and Reform of Teaching Models in New Engineering Across Ability Domains—Under the Background of the “Double First-Class” Initiative
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.1311905, PDF,   
作者: 张 举, 耿海军:山西大学自动化与软件学院,山西 太原;田晋平:山西大学现代教育技术学院,山西 太原
关键词: “双一流”建设跨能力域计算思维教材开发教学改革“Double First-Class” Construction Cross-Capability Domain Computational Thinking Textbook Development Teaching Reform
摘要: 随着“双一流”建设的深入推进,我国高等教育正面临着前所未有的发展机遇和挑战。新一代信息技术产业需要具备“计算思维 + 领域知识”的复合型人才,而当前工程教育中存在“学科交叉表面化”、“能力培养碎片化”问题,亟需构建系统化的跨能力域培养体系。文章聚焦这一背景,分析了当前计算思维类教材的现状,构建了跨能力域计算思维理论框架,并提出针对计算思维的教学设计和评价体系,为高校新工科跨能力域的教学改革提供参考。
Abstract: With the in-depth advancement of the “Double First-Class” initiative, China’s higher education is facing unprecedented development opportunities and challenges. The new generation of the information technology industry requires compound talents with “computational thinking + domain knowledge”. However, in current engineering education, there exist problems such as “superficial interdisciplinary integration” and “fragmented ability cultivation”, which urgently need to be addressed by building a systematic cross-domain ability cultivation system. This paper focuses on this background, analyzes the current status of computational thinking textbooks, constructs a cross-ability domain computational thinking theoretical framework, and proposes a teaching design and evaluation system for computational thinking, providing a reference for the cross-ability domain teaching reform of new engineering disciplines in colleges and universities.
文章引用:张举, 田晋平, 耿海军. 新工科跨能力域计算思维教材开发与教学模式改革——“双一流”建设背景下[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(11): 566-573. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.1311905

参考文献

[1] 教育部. 卓越工程师培养现场交流推进会召开[EB/OL]. 2025-06-19.
https://hudong.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/moe_1485/202506/t20250619_1194730.html, 2025-09-25.
[2] 杨卫. 融合专家判断与客观数据的学科评估[EB/OL]. 中国教育报, 2020-11-04.
https://ict.edu.cn/news/jrgz/jydt/n20201104_74346.shtml, 2025-09-25.
[3] 教育部办公厅. 关于印发《第二批新工科研究与实践项目指南》的通知[EB/OL]. 2020-11-30.
https://jszx.cau.edu.cn/art/2020/11/30/art_30570_719882.html, 2025-09-25.
[4] 教育部高等教育司. 2023年普通高校本科专业教学质量报告[R]. 北京: 中华人民共和国教育部, 2024.
[5] 刘三女牙, 杨宗凯. 计算思维: 从图灵到现在[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(8): 1-16.
[6] 倪志安. 论传统教科书的物质本体论局限——马克思主义哲学教育方法论探讨之一[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(2): 77-83.
[7] 高瑞荣. 从“教教材”到“用教材教”: 争议与反思[J]. 上海教育科研, 2016(7): 12-15.
[8] 罗生全, 吴志敏. “大教材观”与教材强国建设[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 50(3): 203-212.
[9] 2023年CCF秀湖会议. 人工智能时代, 计算机课程体系该如何变革? [EB/OL]. 2023-11-05.
http://cn-sec.com/archives/2177532.html, 2025-09-25.
[10] 王霆, 郭文英, 刘平. AI赋能职业教育教材形态创新路径[N]. 新华日报, 2025-09-12(10).
[11] 白雪梅, 顾小清. K12阶段学生计算思维评价工具构建与应用[J]. 中国电化教育, 2019(10): 83-90.
[12] Kong, S.C. (2020) Use Coding as a Pedagogy for Teaching Subject Knowledge in Mathematics, General Studies and English Language and Fostering Computational Thinking. The Education University of Hong Kong.