电商平台推荐算法的法律风险及规制路径研究
Research on Legal Risks and Regulatory Paths of E-Commerce Platform Recommendation Algorithms
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14113716, PDF,   
作者: 林泓妤:浙江理工大学法学与人文学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 推荐算法电商平台法律风险算法规制Recommendation Algorithm E-Commerce Platform Legal Risks Algorithm Regulatory
摘要: 随着数字经济的深入发展,电商平台推荐算法在提升交易效率的同时,也引发了复杂的法律风险。本文系统分析了推荐算法从技术工具向准公共权力演变的属性特征,深入探讨了算法在消费者交易和司法活动两个场景中引发的公平性、透明度及权利保障等法律风险。基于此,提出构建平台推荐算法的综合规制路径,以多方协同治理为核心,包含权责明晰的法律责任体系、技术赋能的监管体系和动态优化调整机制。以平衡技术创新与权益保护,维护个人权益与公共秩序。
Abstract: With the deepening development of the digital economy, recommendation algorithms on e-commerce platforms have not only improved transaction efficiency, but also raised complex legal risks. This article systematically analyzes the attribute characteristics of the evolution of recommendation algorithms from technical tools to quasi public power, and deeply explores the legal risks of fairness, transparency, and rights protection caused by algorithms in two scenarios: consumer transactions and judicial activities. Based on this, a comprehensive regulatory path for building platform recommendation algorithms is proposed, with multi-party collaborative governance as the core, including a legal responsibility system with clear rights and responsibilities, a regulatory system empowered by technology, and a dynamic optimization and adjustment mechanism. To balance technological innovation and rights protection, and to safeguard individual rights and public order.
文章引用:林泓妤. 电商平台推荐算法的法律风险及规制路径研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 2513-2519. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113716

参考文献

[1] 崔靖梓. 算法歧视挑战下平等权保护的危机与应对[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2019, 37(3): 29-42.
[2] 刘友华. 算法偏见及其规制路径研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(6): 55-66.
[3] 蔡星月. 算法决策权的异化及其矫正[J]. 政法论坛, 2021, 39(5): 25-37.
[4] 梁志文. 论算法排他权: 破除算法偏见的路径选择[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(8): 94-106.
[5] 徐舒浩. 司法人工智能的理由模式及其功能限度[J]. 法学研究, 2025, 47(5): 54-73.
[6] 马靖云. 智慧司法的难题及其破解[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019, 22(4): 110-117.
[7] 裴炜. 共建共治共享理念下数字社会治理的多主体协同[J]. 数字法治, 2023(2): 17-23.
[8] 於兴中. 算法社会与人的秉性[J]. 中国法律评论, 2018(2): 57-65.
[9] 张凌寒. 算法规制的迭代与革新[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(2): 16-26.
[10] 解志勇, 修青华. 互联网治理视域中的平台责任研究[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017(5): 102-106+147.
[11] 陈京春. 算法的可解释性与刑法归责[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2025, 43(4): 63-76.
[12] 江溯. 自动化决策、刑事司法与算法规制——由卢米斯案引发的思考[J]. 东方法学, 2020(3): 76-88.