排放中性诊断技术研究
Research on Emission Neutral Diagnostics Technology
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2025.1511173, PDF,   
作者: 张志辉, 马 毅, 胡 君, 徐划龙, 秦金龙, 刘 明, 陈 磊:中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司,重庆;移动源绿色低碳测评与控制重庆市重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 排放中性诊断排放中性默认操作法规差异改进建议Emission Neutral Diagnostics Emission Neutral Diagnostics Action Regulatory Differences Improvement Suggestions
摘要: 本文围绕排放中性诊断(Emission Neutral Diagnostics, END)技术及其触发的排放中性默认操作(Emission Neutral Diagnostics Action, ENDA)在汽车行业的应用展开研究,以应对更严格的环保法规。研究深入对比美标、欧盟相关法规与中国轻型车国六排放标准中END及相近概念的差异,如定义、豁免要求、申报管理等,指出当前国标END法规存在的问题。同时,提出下一阶段END法规的改进建议,包括完善END判定条件、纳入车载诊断系统(OBD)演示试验以及建立申报管理规范等。在此基础上,提出了END概念在新能源汽车三电系统(电池、电机、电控)诊断中的延伸应用的建议。这些研究内容有助于提升汽车环保性能,推动汽车行业可持续发展,增强研究的全面性与前瞻性。
Abstract: This paper focuses on the application of Emission Neutral Diagnostics (END) and the Emission Neutral Diagnostics Action (ENDA) triggered by it in the automotive industry, aiming to address increasingly stringent environmental regulations. The study conducts an in-depth comparison of differences in END and similar concepts (including definitions, exemption requirements, and declaration management) among American standards, relevant EU regulations, and China’s National VI emission standards for light-duty vehicles, and identifies existing issues in the current national standard END regulations. Meanwhile, it puts forward suggestions for improving END regulations in the next stage, such as refining END determination criteria, integrating END into On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) demonstration tests, and establishing standardized declaration management practices. On this basis, the paper proposes recommendations for the extended application of the END concept in the diagnosis of the three-electric system (battery, motor, electronic control) of new energy vehicles. These research contents are conducive to enhancing the environmental performance of automobiles, promoting the sustainable development of the automotive industry, and improving the comprehensiveness and forward-looking nature of the research.
文章引用:张志辉, 马毅, 胡君, 徐划龙, 秦金龙, 刘明, 陈磊. 排放中性诊断技术研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2025, 15(11): 1590-1600. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2025.1511173

参考文献

[1] California Code of Regulations (2022) Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 1968.2. Office of Administrative Law, State of California.
[2] 中国汽车工业协会. 中国汽车产业排放控制发展报告(2023) [R]. 北京: 中国汽车工业协会, 2023.
[3] 环境保护部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段): GB 18352.6-2016 [S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2016.
[4] Smith, J., Johnson, M. and Brown, K. (2018) Effectiveness of Emission Neutral Diagnostics in Reducing Vehicle Emissions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 144, Article 04018065.
[5] Jones, R., Williams, A. and Davis, L. (2020) Robustness of OBD Systems and Fault Response Strategies in Euro 6 Vehicles. Applied Energy, 269, Article 115123.
[6] 王磊, 李建秋, 欧阳明高. 国六排放标准下OBD系统故障诊断逻辑优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2019, 41(5): 521-527.
[7] 李阳, 张立军, 陈虹. 国六OBD系统测试难点及解决方案[J]. 汽车技术, 2021(3): 45-50.
[8] International Organization for Standardization (2011) Road Vehicles—Functional Safety—Part 5: Product Development at the Hardware Leve. ISO 26262-5:2011. ISO.
[9] European Commission (2022) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Type Approval of Motor Vehicles. European Commission.
[10] Brown, T., Miller, S. and Wilson, E. (2019) Comparison of Fault Diagnosis Exemption Clauses in US and EU Emission Standards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 432-443.