价格认定的困境和出路
The Dilemma and Outlet of Price Evaluation
摘要: 价格认定广泛存在于涉财产案件中,价格认定结论书是定罪量刑的重要依据。然而,价格认定结论书存在认定人员技术能力弱、认定程序简单、证据审查规范不明等问题。这些问题源于将价格认定定性为行政确认不当、证据属性不明。根据立法法、行政法的一般原则,价格认定不符合行政确认的特点、价格认证部门履行价格认定职责缺乏正当授权、将价格认定定性为行政确认会损害司法公正和效率。立足于刑事诉讼法定证据分类和实践需要,借鉴域外证据法实践,应当将价格认定纳入司法鉴定。
Abstract: Price evaluation widely exists in property cases, price evaluation conclusion is an important basis for conviction and sentencing. However, there are some problems in the conclusion of price appraisal, such as the weak technical ability of the appraiser, the simple appraisal procedure and the unclear standards of evidence examination. These problems result from the improper administrative confirmation of price assessment and the uncertain attribute of evidence. According to the general principles of legislation law and administrative law, price assessment does not conform to the characteristics of administrative confirmation, price certification departments lack proper authorization to perform the duties of price assessment, and characterizing price assessment as administrative confirmation will damage judicial justice and efficiency. Based on the need of legal evidence classification and practice in criminal litigation, price assessment should be incorporated into judicial expertise by referring to the practice of extra-territorial evidence law.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张会锋. 刑事诉讼中“价格认定”证据属性问题探析[J]. 中国刑事警察, 2019(6): 54.
|
|
[2]
|
检答网精品问答. 价格认定结论书是属于鉴定意见还是书证? [Z]. 潍坊检察微信公众号, 2019-05-08.
|
|
[3]
|
王世杰. 论行政行为对刑事审判的拘束[J]. 政治与法律, 2018(6): 26-40.
|
|
[4]
|
黄金枝, 马曼. 盗窃案中涉案财物价格鉴定结论的审查[J]. 中国检察官, 2010(2): 18-20.
|
|
[5]
|
[德]托马斯∙魏根特. 德国刑事诉讼程序[M]. 岳礼玲, 温小洁, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004: 178.
|
|
[6]
|
[日]田口守一. 刑事诉讼法[M]. 第七版. 张凌, 于秀峰, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019: 121.
|
|
[7]
|
[德]克劳思∙罗科信. 刑事诉讼法[M]. 吴丽琪, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 261.
|
|
[8]
|
于朝. 对司法鉴定基本概念的几点思考[C]//第三届证据理论与科学国际研讨会论文集. 2011: 406-413.
|
|
[9]
|
卞建林, 谭世贵. 证据法学[M]. 第四版. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2019: 275.
|
|
[10]
|
尹红, 刘乘风. 价格认定制度国际比较及启示[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2019(11): 55-58.
|
|
[11]
|
何家弘. 外国证据法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 61.
|
|
[12]
|
陈金明. 德国司法鉴定的特点及其对我国的借鉴[J]. 中国司法, 2010(4): 106-109.
|
|
[13]
|
孙佑海, 李曙光. 德国法院与司法制度[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 327.
|
|
[14]
|
王一民. 德国的涉案物品价格评估[J]. 北京物价, 1999(12): 34-35.
|
|
[15]
|
林广海, 张学军. 完善我国司法鉴定法律制度之管见[J]. 科技与法律, 2008(3): 72-76.
|
|
[16]
|
陈如超. 司法鉴定管理体制改革的方向与逻辑[J]. 法学研究, 2016, 38(1): 187-208.
|
|
[17]
|
龙宗智. 立法原意何处寻: 评2021年最高人民法院适用刑事诉讼法司法解释[J]. 中国法学, 2021(4): 247-266.
|