江苏省制造业碳达峰最优路径研究
Research on the Optimal Pathway for Carbon Peak in Jiangsu’s Manufacturing Industry
摘要: 《中国制造2025》试点城市群的江苏省作为中国制造业的重地,其制造业碳达峰最优路径研究,对于全国“双碳”目标的实现具有重要示范意义。基于2002、2007、2012、2017年江苏省投入产出表,利用投入产出分析方法准确测度15个制造业的完全碳排放量。《江苏省碳达峰实施方案》中提出希望金属冶炼及压延加工品、非金属矿物制品、化学产品、纺织服装鞋帽及其羽绒制品挣力率先达峰,因此本文以这五个制造业部门作为研究对象。在此基础上构建STIRPAT模型,并结合岭回归方法识别碳排放的关键驱动因素,包括就业人数、人均产值、能源结构、能源利用效率和完全碳排放强度。通过构建四类发展路径模式,预测制造业各部门未来实现碳达峰的最优路径。研究得出,不同部门碳达峰进程差异显著:轻工类行业纺织服装鞋帽与羽绒制品、造纸印刷和文教体育用品在绿色发展路径下可于2030年前实现碳达峰且累计排放最低。高碳排放行业如金属冶炼和压延加工品、非金属矿物制品及化学产品需依赖技术突破路径,实现峰值和累计排放最小化。不同部门碳达峰进程呈明显分化特征,因此制定分部门、分路径的差异化减排策略对于实现江苏制造业整体低碳转型具有重要指导意义。
Abstract: As one of the pilot city clusters for Made in China 2025, Jiangsu Province—being a major hub of China’s manufacturing industry—holds significant demonstrative value for achieving the national “dual carbon” goals. Based on the 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017 input–output tables of Jiangsu Province, this study employs the input–output analysis method to accurately measure the total carbon emissions of 15 manufacturing sectors. On this basis, a STIRPAT model is constructed and combined with ridge regression to identify the key drivers of carbon emissions, including employment, per capita output value, energy structure, energy utilization efficiency, and total carbon emission intensity. Through four development pathway scenarios, the study forecasts the optimal pathways for different manufacturing sectors to achieve carbon peaking in the future. The results show significant heterogeneity in the carbon peaking timelines across sectors: petroleum refining, coking and nuclear fuel processing, chemical products, textiles, and apparel, leather, and down products are expected to peak before 2030; transportation equipment, metal products, and communication equipment, computers, and other electronic products are projected to peak after 2030; whereas non-metallic mineral products, electrical machinery and equipment, and six other sectors may still face challenges in peaking before 2040. Based on a trade-off analysis between cumulative carbon emissions and carbon peaking time, differentiated optimal pathways are proposed: petroleum refining, coking and nuclear fuel processing, chemical products, transportation equipment, metal products, communication equipment, computers and other electronic products, wood processing and furniture, non-metallic mineral products, food and tobacco, and electrical machinery and equipment are more suitable for the “green development” pathway; metal smelting and rolling processing, general and special equipment, instruments and meters, paper printing, and cultural, educational, and sports goods show better emission reduction performance under the “baseline” pathway; while textiles and apparel, leather, and down products, as well as textiles, rely on the “technological breakthrough” pathway to achieve carbon peaking.
文章引用:金继红, 辛晓静. 江苏省制造业碳达峰最优路径研究[J]. 低碳经济, 2025, 14(4): 455-468. https://doi.org/10.12677/jlce.2025.144047

参考文献

[1] 丁唯佳, 吴先华, 孙宁, 等. 基于STIRPAT模型的我国制造业碳排放影响因素研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2012, 31(3): 499-506.
[2] Xu, B. and Lin, B. (2016) Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China’s Manufacturing Industry: A Dynamic Vector Autoregression Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 594-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 张丽峰. 我国部门结构、能源结构和碳排放关系研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(5): 1-7.
[4] Lenzen, M. (1998) Primary Energy and Greenhouse Gases Embodied in Australian Final Consumption: An Input-Output Analysis. Energy Policy, 26, 495-506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 郭朝先. 部门结构变动对中国碳排放的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(7): 15-20.
[6] 宋鹏, 张慧敏, 毛显强. 面向碳达峰目标的重庆市碳减排路径[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(3): 1446-1455.
[7] 王勇, 毕莹, 王恩东. 中国工业碳排放达峰的情景预测与减排潜力评估[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2017, 27(10): 131-140.
[8] 赵金辉, 李景顺, 王潘乐, 等. 基于Lasso-BP神经网络模型的河南省碳达峰路径研究[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(12): 151-156, 164.
[9] 杨君. 中国交通运输业碳排放测度及减排路径研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2022
[10] 杨绍华, 张宇泉, 耿涌. 基于LMDI的长江经济带交通碳排放变化分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(10): 4817-4826.
[11] Dietz, T. and Rosa, E.A. (1994) Rethinking the Environmental Impacts of Population, Affluence and Technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, 277-300.
[12] York, R., Rosa, E.A. and Dietz, T. (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and Impact: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics, 46, 351-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 中华人民共和国国家统计局统计设计管理司. 国民经济部门分类GB/T4754-2017 [M]. 北京: 国家统计局统计设计管理司, 2017.
[14] 杨学新. 基于IPSO-BP神经网络模型的江西省工业碳排放预测研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023.
[15] 单葆国, 姚力, 张成龙, 等. 中国能源消费碳排放达峰情景预测: 基于STIRPAT扩展模型[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(7): 4052-4064.
[16] 王红平, 杨建州. 基于扩展STIRPAT模型的广东省造纸工业碳排放情景预测[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(9): 5535-5542.
[17] Xu, G., Schwarz, P. and Yang, H. (2019) Determining China’s CO2 Emissions Peak with a Dynamic Nonlinear Artificial Neural Network Approach and Scenario Analysis. Energy Policy, 128, 752-762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 中国石油经济技术研究院. 2050年世界与中国能源展望(2020版) [R]. 研究报告, 中国石油经济技术研究院, 2020.
[19] 全球能源互联网发展合作组织. 中国2030年能源电力发展规划研究及2060年展望[R]. 研究报告, 全球能源互联网发展合作组织2021.
[20] 何乐天, 杨泳琪, 李蓉, 等. 基于STIRPAT模型的黑龙江省工业碳排放情景分析与峰值预测[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 162-172.
[21] 廖祖君, 张剑宇, 陈诗薇. 碳排放影响因素及达峰路径研究——基于四川省的分析[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(9): 95-101.
[22] 胡西武, 黄蕾, 李毅. 应对气候变化下的青藏高原碳脱钩水平测度及碳达峰路径选择——以青海省为例[J]. 青海社会科学, 2021(5): 43-54.