数字时代网约工生计脆弱性分析
Analysis on Livelihood Vulnerability of Express Flexible Employees in the Digital Age
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.1511304, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曾 研, 何 雄*:中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 网约工生计脆弱性平台经济Net Workers Livelihood Vulnerability Platform Economy
摘要: 以网约工为代表的数字平台就业者已成为增长势头强劲的新就业群体,但由于该工作属于非正规就业且劳动强度大,其生计往往会因此面临脆弱性问题。本文基于2019年CHFS数据,通过“暴露–敏感–适应能力”脆弱性分析框架,构建了网约工生计脆弱性评估分析指标体系分析了不同个体特征和社会特征下网约工的生计脆弱性指数及其维度。研究发现:(1) 高生计脆弱性网约工具有高龄、低教育水平、低健康水平等个体特征。(2) 低健康水平和低受教育程度的网约工暴露性与敏感性高、适应性低。(3) 网约工群体的社会保险参与情况不容乐观,社会保险的平均拥有量仅达到1.613。虽然参与社会保险的网约工适应性较高,但是由于参与社会保险需要一定的成本,且对于网约工群体而言价格不菲,此时,网约工群体更愿意选择不参与社会保险。为提高网约工群体生计的可持续性,需要加强对网约工群体的社会保障力度。
Abstract: Flexible workers, represented by net workers, have become a new employment group with strong growth momentum, and their employment and income realization are closely related to their livelihood sustainability. Based on the 2019 CHFS data, this paper constructs a vulnerability assessment index system to analyze the livelihood vulnerability of net workers under different individual and social characteristics through the vulnerability analysis framework of “exposure-sensitivity-adaptive capacity”. The index and its dimensions were analyzed under different individual characteristics and social characteristics. The study found that: (1) Highly vulnerable netizens have individual characteristics of high age, low education level and low health level. (2) Netizens with low health and education levels have high exposure and sensitivity and low adaptability. (3) The social insurance participation of the net contracting worker group is not optimistic, and the average ownership of social insurance only reaches 1.613. Although the adaptability of net contracting workers who participate in social insurance is higher, because the participation in social insurance requires a certain amount of cost, and the price is not expensive for the net contracting worker group, at this time, the group of net contracting workers prefers to choose not to participate in social insurance. In order to improve the sustainability of their livelihoods, social security should be strengthened.
文章引用:曾研, 何雄. 数字时代网约工生计脆弱性分析[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(11): 165-175. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.1511304

参考文献

[1] 韩烨. 网约工职业伤害保障的制度构建[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2022, 62(3): 140-1518.
[2] 李才海, 王妍. 平台经济下灵活就业者用工关系研究[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2020(8): 12-14.
[3] 廉思, 周宇香. 城市快递小哥群体的风险压力及疏解对策研究: 基于北京市的实证分析[J]. 青年探索, 2019(6): 41-52.
[4] 国家信息中心分享经济研究中心. 中国共享经济发展报告(2021) [EB/OL]. 2021-02-19.
http://www.sic.gov.cn/sic/93/552/557/0219/10775_pc.html, 2025-09-19.
[5] 关博, 朱小玉. 新技术、新经济和新业态劳动者平等参加社会保险的主要制约与建议: 基于320名“三新”劳动者的典型调研[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2018, 35(12): 88-94.
[6] 陈俊梁, 唐怡静. 移动互联网时代灵活就业现象研究[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2019(17): 19-20.
[7] 王全兴, 王茜. 我国“网约工”的劳动关系认定及权益保护[J]. 法学, 2018(4): 57-72.
[8] 胡放之. 网约工劳动权益保障问题研究: 基于湖北外卖骑手的调查[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2019(10): 56-62.
[9] 唐鑛, 胡夏枫. 网约工的劳动权益保护[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2018(2): 109-115.
[10] 李营辉. 被算法裹挟的“裸奔人”: 新就业形态下网约工群体劳动权益调查[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(7): 12-19, 39.
[11] 李争, 刘东洋, 杨俊. 生计脆弱性研究综述及其在矿区的研究设想[J]. 国土资源情报, 2020(12): 39-45.
[12] 赵锋. 可持续生计分析框架的理论比较与研究述评[J]. 兰州财经大学学报, 2015, 31(5): 86-93.
[13] 赵锋, 杨云彦. 外力冲击下水库移民生计脆弱性及其解决机制: 以南水北调中线工程库区为例[J]. 人口与经济, 2009(4): 1-7.
[14] Chambers, R. and Conway, G. (1992) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies, 296.
[15] Moser, C.O.N. (1998) The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies. World Development, 26, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Watts, M.J. and Bohle, H.G. (1993) The Space of Vulnerability: The Causal Structure of Hunger and Famine. Progress in Human Geography, 17, 43-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WGII_TAR_full_report-2.pdf
[18] Hahn, M.B., Riederer, A.M. and Foster, S.O. (2009) The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A Pragmatic Approach to Assessing Risks from Climate Variability and Change—A Case Study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 19, 74-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 刘伟, 朱玉春. 健康风险对农户贫困脆弱性的影响研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(13): 3216-3220.
[20] 刘伟, 徐洁, 黎洁. 陕南易地扶贫搬迁农户生计脆弱性研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2002-2014.
[21] 李广东, 邱道持, 王利平, 等. 生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响: 渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4): 504-515.
[22] 赵雪雁, 赵海莉, 刘春芳. 石羊河下游农户的生计风险及应对策略[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(5): 922-932.
[23] 张钦, 赵雪雁, 王亚茹, 等. 气候变化对石羊河流域农户生计资本的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(3): 1-9.
[24] 徐洁, 李树茁, 吴正, 等. 农村老年人家庭养老脆弱性评估: 基于安徽农村地区的实证研究[J]. 人口研究, 2019, 43(1): 91-101.
[25] Cinner, J.E., McClanahan, T.R., Graham, N.A.J., Daw, T.M., Maina, J., Stead, S.M., et al. (2012) Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Key Impacts of Climate Change on Coral Reef Fisheries. Global Environmental Change, 22, 12-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Morzaria-Luna, H.N., Turk-Boyer, P. and Moreno-Baez, M. (2014) Social Indicators of Vulnerability for Fishing Communities in the Northern Gulf of California, Mexico: Implications for Climate Change. Marine Policy, 45, 182-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 邹会聪, 邓志强. 青年自雇型就业的脆弱性研究: 以网约工为例[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(12): 101-109.