电商经济下有效通知规则的适用分歧与认定
Disagreements and Determination of Effective Notification Rules in the E-Commerce Economy
摘要: 通知删除规则作为互联网时代的新兴规则,其在解决网络侵权纠纷中发挥着不容小觑的作用。但是随着数字化经济的发展,网络侵权案件逐年增多,且其呈现出证据难以保存性、发生频率迅速性、案件分布广泛性、隐蔽性等特点,而相关法律法规对“有效通知”的规定较为宽泛,致司法、平台、理论界界定不一。只有明晰裁判标准、确定有效通知的构成要件、加之对初步证据进行类型化区分,才能使通知删除规则的应用符合立法目的,以满足网络生态环境的需求。
Abstract: As a new rule in the Internet era, the notice deletion rule plays an important role in solving network infringement disputes. However, with the development of the digital economy, the number of online infringement cases has been increasing year by year, and they exhibit characteristics such as difficulty in preserving evidence, rapid occurrence frequency, widespread distribution of cases, and concealment. Relevant laws and regulations have relatively broad provisions on “effective notification”, resulting in inconsistent definitions in the judiciary, platforms, and theoretical circles. Only by clarifying the standards of judgment, determining the constituent elements of effective notification, and categorizing preliminary evidence, can the application of notification deletion rules comply with legislative purposes and meet the needs of the online ecosystem.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
周学峰. “通知-移除”规则的应然定位与相关制度构造[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(6): 21-35.
|
|
[2]
|
丁晓东. 作为举报治理的通知删除: 避风港规则反思[J]. 法学论坛, 2025, 40(2): 42-54.
|
|
[3]
|
徐伟. 网络服务提供者“知道”认定新诠——兼驳网络服务提供者“应知”论[J]. 法律科学, 2014, 32(2): 163-173.
|
|
[4]
|
任晓敏, 赵鑫莹. 我国网络版权治理的影响变量、运作模式与核心逻辑[J]. 中国编辑, 2023(3): 20-25+73.
|
|
[5]
|
董春华. 我国专利权适用善意取得制度的障碍及其克服[J]. 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 48(5): 129-137.
|
|
[6]
|
程啸. 论我国《民法典》网络侵权责任中的通知规则[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(6): 143.
|
|
[7]
|
何炼红. 论算法时代网络著作权侵权中的通知规则[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(4): 195-200.
|
|
[8]
|
梅傲, 郑宇豪. 人工智能作品的困境及求解: 以人工智能写作领域第一案为考察中心[J]. 出版发行研究, 2020(12): 50-56.
|
|
[9]
|
王滢. 《民法典》第1195条(“通知删除”规则)评注[J]. 法学家, 2025(2): 175-190+196.
|
|
[10]
|
申双飞. “通知-删除”规则中有效通知的判定——以朗科公司诉阿里巴巴公司和友拓公司案为例[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2022(12): 196-200.
|
|
[11]
|
王杰. “通知-删除”规则的结构扩张与适用限制[J]. 知识产权, 2025(8): 3-22.
|