模糊环境下电商互补品供应链的Stackelberg博弈与定价策略研究
Research on Stackelberg Game and Pricing Strategies in E-Commerce Complementary Product Supply Chains under Fuzzy Environments
摘要: 在电子商务环境下,针对网络渠道中常见的互补品组合销售场景(如手机与耳机、主机与配件等),本研究构建了一个以制造商为主导、零售商为跟从的双互补品供应链Stackelberg博弈模型。考虑到电商市场中需求波动频繁、制造成本不确定等现实特征,模型将需求函数参数与生产成本设定为模糊变量。基于电商平台中常见的供应链协作与决策模式,研究分别探讨了链间与链内Stackelberg博弈,并据此建立了四种价格决策的期望值模型,包括:集中–集中决策(平台统一管控)、集中–分散决策(制造商主导定价)、分散–集中决策(零售商主导定价)以及分散–分散决策(各自独立决策)。运用博弈论方法,解析出四种结构下的均衡价格与利润水平。进一步通过数值仿真,验证了不同决策结构对电商互补品供应链定价与利润的影响,并比较得出可实现系统帕累托最优的协调机制。研究结果为电商企业在网络营销中制定互补品组合定价与渠道协同策略提供了理论参考与管理启示。
Abstract: In the context of e-commerce, this study addresses the common scenario of bundled sales for complementary products (e.g., smartphones and earphones, main units and accessories) through online channels. A Stackelberg game model is developed for a two-complementary product supply chain, where the manufacturer acts as the leader and the retailer as the follower, reflecting the realities of the e-commerce market, such as frequent demand fluctuations and manufacturing cost uncertainties, the model characterizes demand function parameters and production costs as fuzzy variables. Based on common supply chain collaboration and decision-making modes in e-commerce platforms, the research explores both inter-chain and intra-chain Stackelberg games. Accordingly, four expected value models for pricing decisions are established: Centralized-Centralized (platform unified control), Centralized-Decentralized (manufacturer-led pricing), Decentralized-Centralized (retailer-led pricing), and Decentralized-Decentralized (independent decision-making). Using game theory methods, the equilibrium prices and profit levels under these four structures are derived. Furthermore, numerical simulations are conducted to verify the impact of different decision-making structures on pricing and profits within the e-commerce complementary product supply chain. A comparative analysis identifies a coordination mechanism that can achieve a system-wide Pareto optimum. The research findings provide theoretical references and managerial insights for e-commerce enterprises in formulating pricing strategies for complementary product bundles and channel coordination strategies in online marketing.
文章引用:金丝, 丘小玲. 模糊环境下电商互补品供应链的Stackelberg博弈与定价策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 3360-3371. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14113820

参考文献

[1] Zhao, J., Liu, W. and Wei, J. (2013) Competition under Manufacturer Service and Price in Fuzzy Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems, 50, 121-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Wang, S.N. (2017) A Manufacturer Stackelberg Game in Price Competition Supply Chain under a Fuzzy Decision Environment. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 47, 49-55.
[3] 汪宁宁, 杨涛. 需求不确定环境下考虑促销努力的平台供应链合作模式选择[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(6): 61-73.
[4] 李军涛, 刘朋飞, 胡启贤. 模糊环境下考虑公平偏好的绿色供应链博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(4): 84-94.
[5] 王淑纳, 胡志华. 模糊环境下考虑零售商风险偏好的绿色供应链博弈模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(3): 711-723.
[6] 尚文芳, 滕亮亮. 考虑政府补贴和销售努力的零售商主导型绿色供应链博弈策略[J]. 系统工程, 2020, 38(2): 40-50.
[7] 关志民, 曲优, 赵莹. 考虑决策者失望规避的供应链协同绿色创新动态优化与协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 96-107.
[8] 公彦德, 陈梦泽. 考虑企业社会责任和公平偏好的绿色供应链决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(7): 1743-1753.
[9] 卢安文, 陈浪. 互补品供应链Stackelberg博弈下纵向决策研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(1): 125-137.
[10] 李柏勋, 周永务, 王圣东. 供应链间Stackelberg博弈下纵向结构决策模型[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(12): 50-58.
[11] 颜波, 李鸿媛, 胡蝶. 物流与价格双重竞争下产品替代对供应链决策的影响[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(15): 108-117.
[12] 鄢章华, 刘蕾, 白世贞. 互补品供应链广告策略研究[J]. 山东财经大学学报, 2016, 28(1): 83-91.