1例小肠血管畸形出血的粪便隐血检测方法差异启示
Enlightenment from Discrepancies in Fecal Occult Blood Test Methods in a Case of Small Intestinal Vascular Malformation Bleeding
摘要: 本文报告一例82岁女性患者,因反复黑便18年余,再发1天入院,既往确诊为小肠血管畸形。在诊疗过程中,粪便隐血检测出现免疫法(FIT)与化学法、转铁蛋白检测结果不一致的情况:免疫法呈阴性,而化学法及转铁蛋白检测呈阳性。该差异暴露出在血红蛋白受肠道环境影响降解时,单纯依赖免疫法可能漏诊持续出血。结合患者血红蛋白持续下降的临床表现,多方法联合检测纠正了单一方法的局限性,明确了出血未停止,指导临床继续止血治疗并调整监测策略。本案例提示,在不明原因消化道出血(OGIB)的评估中,应根据病情特点联合使用不同原理的隐血检测方法,以提高诊断准确性。
Abstract: This article reports the case of an 82-year-old female patient who was admitted to the hospital due to recurrent melena for over 18 years, with a recurrence one day prior. She had a previous diagnosis of small intestinal vascular malformation. During the diagnostic process, inconsistent results were observed among fecal occult blood tests: the immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT) was negative, while the chemical method and transferrin test were positive. This discrepancy highlighted that relying solely on the immunochemical method may lead to missed diagnoses of persistent bleeding when hemoglobin is degraded by the intestinal environment. Combined with the clinical manifestation of a continuous decline in the patient’s hemoglobin levels, the multi-method approach corrected the limitations of relying on a single method, confirming that the bleeding had not stopped and guiding the clinical decision to continue hemostatic treatment and adjust the monitoring strategy. This case suggests that in the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), occult blood detection methods based on different principles should be used in combination according to the characteristics of the condition to improve diagnostic accuracy.
文章引用:李艾玲, 王丽, 徐通泽. 1例小肠血管畸形出血的粪便隐血检测方法差异启示[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(12): 297-304. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15123410

参考文献

[1] 郑洪君. 小肠血管畸形伴出血的诊断新进展[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2007(1): 7-10.
[2] 杨勇辉, 王育光, 余志荣. 小肠血管畸形并出血的临床特征分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2016, 11(7): 88-89.
[3] 李欢, 徐伶俐, 张鑫, 等. 弹簧圈栓塞治疗小肠动静脉血管畸形出血1例报道[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2025, 34(2): 308-309.
[4] 刘慧芳. 167例小肠出血的病因及临床诊疗分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2019.
[5] 谢渭芬, 施健. 小肠出血诊治专家共识意见(2018年, 南京) [J]. 上海医学, 2018, 41(9): 513-518.
[6] 谭罗坤, 罗海顺, 伍尚剑, 等. 粪便隐血试验和转铁蛋白联合检测在诊断消化性出血中的意义[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(21): 137-139.
[7] 何治军, 邓天伟, 王孟仙, 等. 胶囊内镜对不同年龄人群不明消化道出血的诊断价值[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2016, 18(6): 576-578.
[8] Zhu, M.M., Xu, X.T., Nie, F., Tong, J.L., Xiao, S.D. and Ran, Z.H. (2010) Comparison of Immunochemical and Guaiac‐based Fecal Occult Blood Test in Screening and Surveillance for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 11, 148-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hewitson, P., Glasziou, P.P., Irwig, L., Towler, B. and Watson, E. (2007) Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using the Faecal Occult Blood Test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011, CD001216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ministry of Health, Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS) MDD and Ministry of Health Malaysia (2011) Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test (IFOBT) For Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening. MOH/P/PAK/233. 12(TR).
[11] 娄国平, 李显东, 张昭勇. 联合检测粪便血红蛋白和转铁蛋白在肠癌疾病防治中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2015, 12(9): 1193-1195.
[12] 张慧玲, 孙学春, 蒋锡沂. 粪便隐血试验单抗法和愈创木酯法比较及临床分析[J]. 临沂医学专科学校学报, 2003(6): 450-451.
[13] Wu, C.W., Cao, X., Berger, C.K., Foote, P.H., Mahoney, D.W., Simonson, J.A., et al. (2017) Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific MicroRNA Markers. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 62, 1985-1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 杨勇文, 李从荣, 李艳, 等. 临床三种常规粪便隐血实验的方法学评估[J]. 海南医学, 2015, 26(7): 998-1001.
[15] 邓小凤. 干化学试纸法与显微镜检对尿液潜血的对比分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2013, 24(2): 281-282.
[16] 杨秀娟. 尿干化学检测中的常见影响因素[J]. 中国医药科学, 2011, 1(17): 161, 164.