展览类建筑施工期成本风险评价
Cost Risk Assessment during Construction of Exhibition Buildings
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2025.156257, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 刘思成:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;周亦威*:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧应急管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧城市交通研究院,上海
关键词: 展览类建筑施工项目成本管理风险AHPICUOWGA算子灰色聚类模型Exhibition Related Construction Projects Cost Management Risk AHP ICUOWGA Operator Grey Clustering Model
摘要: 随着各类大型展览类建筑的施工项目的不断推进,针对其施工期成本风险尚未建立起一套全面且完善的评价指标体系。通过研究系统分析施工期遇到的各种潜在风险因素,以问卷调查为基础,通过随机森林算法对风险因素进行筛选。构建了由4个一级指标、20项具体二级指标的综合施工成本风险评价体系。运用层次分析法(AHP)和改进后的ICUOWGA算子确定各个指标的综合权重,并采用灰色聚类模型对项目整体风险及每个二级指标风险进行等级评估。以B市某在施展览类项目为例,在项目整体层面上评估的风险等级属于“中风险”,对属于“中风险”、“较高风险”的指标因素进行具体归类说明。
Abstract: With the continuous promotion of the construction projects of various large-scale exhibition buildings, a comprehensive and perfect evaluation index system has not been established for the cost risk during the construction period. Various potential risk factors encountered during the construction period are systematically analyzed through research. Based on the questionnaire survey, the risk factors are screened through random forest algorithm. A comprehensive construction cost risk assessment system consisting of 4 first-class indicators and 20 specific second-class indicators is constructed. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the improved ICUOWGA operator are used to determine the comprehensive weight of each index, and the grey clustering model is used to evaluate the overall risk of the project and the risk level of each secondary index. Taking an exhibition project under construction in B city as an example, the risk level assessed at the overall level of the project is “medium risk”; the indicator factors belonging to “medium risk” and “higher risk” are classified and explained in detail.
文章引用:刘思成, 周亦威. 展览类建筑施工期成本风险评价[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(6): 62-73. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.156257

参考文献

[1] 刘莹. 苏州地域文化影响下的展览类建筑设计特征研究[J]. 中国建筑装饰装修, 2023(6): 96-98.
[2] 刘泳奇, 吴环宇, 陈珂. 智能建造技术在工程造价管理中的应用研究综述[J]. 建筑经济, 2022, 43(S1): 245-252.
[3] Touran, A. (1993) Probabilistic Cost Estimating with Subjective Correlations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119, 58-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Esfahani, S.H. and Petersen, I.R. (2000) An LMI Approach to Output-Feedback-Guaranteed Cost Control for Uncertain Time-Delay Systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 10, 157-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 廖倩羚, 兰珏菲. 建筑工程概预算控制措施的探讨[J]. 江西建材, 2016(13): 226.
[6] Omotayo, T.S., Kulatunga, U. and Bjeirmi, B. (2018) Critical Success Factors for Kaizen Implementation in the Nigerian Construction Industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 1816-1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 和希顺, 林汉, 胡合林, 等. 全过程造价管理模式下的工程造价控制分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2009(6): 73-76.
[8] 胡梦尧, 卓平山, 吴寒, 等. 基于ISM的工程项目造价风险分析[J]. 中国建筑金属结构, 2023, 22(6): 17-20.
[9] 刘玉明, 刘长滨. 基于全寿命周期成本理论的既有建筑节能经济效益评价[J]. 建筑经济, 2009(3): 58-61.
[10] 杜继龙, 徐元进. 基于随机森林和卷积神经网络的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2025, 42(4): 884-894.
[11] 沙盟, 陈高华, 郭燕飞, 等. 基于改进随机森林的电机轴承故障诊断研究[J]. 太原科技大学学报, 2025, 46(4): 346-351.
[12] 母丹丹, 徐骁, 马西祥. 基于层次分析法的高校实验动物机构服务绩效评价[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2025, 42(7): 260-267.
[13] 牛犇, 邱勇军, 韩松涛. 基于改进熵权法的立体停车设备系统风险评价研究[J]. 起重运输机械, 2024(20): 37-43.
[14] 陈茸, 韩宝安, 韩宝华, 等. 基于CUOWGA算子赋权的建筑施工安全灰色聚类评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(5): 98-105.
[15] Yager, R.R. (1992) Applications and Extensions of OWA Aggregations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37, 103-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Yager, R.R. (1993) Families of OWA Operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 59, 125-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 申建红, 孙小宁, 刘丽丹. “互联网 + PPP”模式下建设项目风险度预测[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2017, 34(5): 27-31+45.
[18] 单晓霖, 焦朋朋. 基于灰色聚类分析法的城乡公交运营质量评价[J]. 北京建筑大学学报, 2021, 37(1): 16-24.
[19] 韩美贵, 王卓甫, 张云清. 最后计划者系统与关键链协同模式[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2017, 34(1): 16-23.