网络爬取数据的刑法规制路径展开
The Exploration of the Path of Criminal Law Regulation for Online Data Crawling
摘要: 大数据时代下,网络爬虫技术作为数据获取的核心工具,在推动数字经济发展的同时,其滥用行为也对数据安全、公民权益及市场秩序构成严重威胁。我国刑法通过计算机信息系统犯罪、侵犯公民个人信息犯罪等罪名体系对其进行规制,但司法实践中面临技术中立性与刑事违法性界分模糊、入罪标准不统一、罪名适用混乱等困境。本文结合典型案例与最新立法动态,从网络数据爬取行为的刑事风险谱系出发,剖析当前刑法规制的实践难题,提出完善路径,明确构建“三阶层认定标准”,并在此基础上对“国家有关规定”“侵入”等相关概念进行解释,以期实现数据安全保护与信息产业发展的平衡。
Abstract: In the era of big data, web crawler technology, as a core tool for data acquisition, promotes the development of the digital economy. However, its abuse also poses a serious threat to data security, citizens’ rights and interests, and market order. China’s Criminal Law regulates such abuse through a system of charges, including crimes against computer information systems and crimes of infringing on citizens’ personal information. Nevertheless, judicial practice faces difficulties such as ambiguity in distinguishing between technical neutrality and criminal illegality, inconsistent standards for criminalization, and confusion in the application of charges. Combining typical cases and the latest legislative developments, this paper starts from the criminal risk spectrum of online data crawling activities, analyzes the practical difficulties in current criminal law regulation, proposes improvement paths, clearly constructs a “three-tier identification standard”, and on this basis interprets relevant concepts such as “relevant national provisions” and “intrusion”, with a view to balancing data security protection and the development of the information industry.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈毅坚, 曾宪哲. 网络爬虫刑法规制研究[J]. 广东社会科学, 2022(5): 240-253.
|
|
[2]
|
孙杰. 数据爬取的刑法规制[J]. 政法论丛, 2021(3): 115-125.
|
|
[3]
|
Kerr, O.S. (2003) Cybercrime’s Scope: Interpreting “Access” and “Authorization” in Computer Misuse Statutes. New York University Law Review, 78, 1596-1668.
|
|
[4]
|
刘艳红, 杨志琼. 网络爬虫的入罪标准与路径研究[J]. 人民检察, 2020(15): 26-31.
|
|
[5]
|
孙禹. 强行爬取公开数据构成犯罪吗[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2021, 29(6): 121-139.
|
|
[6]
|
刘云. 网络数据爬取合法性判定的三阶层认定标准[J]. 东方法学, 2025(4): 37-38.
|
|
[7]
|
李雷. 论数字时代个人信息保护与利用平衡的展开路径[J]. 行政法学研究, 2024(1): 111-122.
|
|
[8]
|
许可. 数据爬取的正当性及其边界[J]. 中国法学, 2021(2): 166-188.
|
|
[9]
|
曹丽萍. 爬虫协议作为商业道德评判行为正当性的考量维度——评北京字节跳动科技有限公司与北京微梦创科网络技术有限公司不正当竞争纠纷案[J]. 法律适用, 2023(5): 95-104.
|
|
[10]
|
石经海, 苏桑妮. 爬取公开数据行为的刑法规制误区与匡正——从全国首例“爬虫”入刑案切入[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 154-164.
|
|
[11]
|
蒋巍. 恶意数据爬取行为的刑法规制研究[J]. 学术论坛, 2020, 43(3): 48-54.
|
|
[12]
|
Goldfoot, J. and Bamzai, A. (2016) A Trespass Framework for the Crime of Hacking. The George Washington Law Review, 84, 1477-1499.
|
|
[13]
|
阮林赟. 网络爬虫刑事违法的立场、标准和限制载[J]. 河北法学, 2021(7): 173-187.
|
|
[14]
|
林维. 数据爬取行为的刑事司法认定[J]. 人民检察, 2020(4): 38-40.
|