电商平台算法推荐下消费者自主权保护研究
Research on the Protection of Consumers’ Autonomy under the Algorithm Recommendation of E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: 随着数字经济快速发展,电商平台算法推荐在提升交易效率的同时,也对消费者自主权保护构成新挑战。文章结合行为经济学理论,深入剖析诱导型、欺诈型与操纵型三类典型的算法推荐侵权形态。研究发现,上述侵权行为根源于技术权力扩张与消费者自主权保护的失衡,且目前难以被国内法有效规制。对此,文章比较分析欧美治理模式并总结经验,结合产业经济学视角,有针对性地提出引入综合审查机制规制诱导型算法推荐、强化信息披露与验证机制规制欺诈型算法推荐、确立操作公平性审查原则规制操纵型算法推荐三种规制方案,旨在完善消费者自主权保护体系,为电商经济健康、有序发展提供有益参考。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital economy, algorithmic recommendation on e-commerce platforms, while improving transaction efficiency, poses new challenges to the protection of consumer autonomy. By integrating behavioral economics theory, this article conducts an in-depth analysis of three typical types of algorithmic recommendation infringement: inductive, deceptive, and manipulative. The research reveals that these infringements stem from the imbalance between the expansion of algorithmic power and the protection of consumer autonomy, and currently, domestic laws find it difficult to effectively regulate them. In response, this article conducts a comparative analysis of European and American governance models and summarizes relevant experiences. From the perspective of industrial economics, it puts forward three targeted regulatory solutions: introducing a comprehensive review mechanism to regulate inductive algorithmic recommendation, strengthening the information disclosure and verification mechanism to regulate deceptive algorithmic recommendation, and establishing an operational fairness review principle to regulate manipulative algorithmic recommendation. The aim is to improve the consumer autonomy protection system and provide useful references for the healthy and orderly development of the e-commerce economy.
文章引用:任碧莹. 电商平台算法推荐下消费者自主权保护研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 45-55. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14123827

参考文献

[1] 王苑. 智能时代个性化定价算法的法律规制[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2025, 33(3): 73-86.
[2] 王年. 数据资源持有权的法律功能与规范构造[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2024, 39(3): 137-152.
[3] 刘颖, 刘文鉴. 数字化背景下德国消费者保护法的新发展——德国《公平消费者合同法》评述与启示[J]. 德国研究, 2023, 38(1): 107-126, 151-152.
[4] 黄毅, 宋子寅. 大数据背景下“算法杀熟”的法律规制[J]. 中州学刊, 2022(4): 50-54.
[5] Fassiaux, S. (2023) Preserving Consumer Autonomy through European Union Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: A Long-Term Approach. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14, 710-730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 刘颖, 刘佳璇. 数字经济中黑暗模式的法律规制: 基本原理、域外方案与本土路径[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024(5): 124-138.
[7] Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, 304.
[8] 张海汝, 李勇坚. 数字平台的诱导、操纵风险与暗模式监管——流量劫持、算法俘获与界面设计陷阱[J]. 财经问题研究, 2022(12): 36-45.
[9] 丁晓东. 隐私政策的多维解读: 告知同意性质的反思与制度重构[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(1): 38-40.
[10] Tim, W. (2019) Blind Spot: The Attention Economy and the Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 82, 801-802.
[11] Alison, H. (2021) Keeping Consumers in the Dark: Addressing “Nagging” Concerns and Injury. Columbia Law Review, 121, 2483-2520.
[12] 刘颖. 迈向数字时代的消费者法: 算法消费者的赋权理论及其体系建构[J]. 社会科学, 2024(7): 180-192.
[13] 刘权. 论互联网平台的主体责任[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2022, 25(5): 79-93.
[14] Luguri, J. and Strahilevitz, L.J. (2021) Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis, 13, 43-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 彭诚信. 论个人信息的双重法律属性[J]. 清华法学, 2021, 15(6): 78-97.
[16] 刘颖, 王佳伟. 平台经济中个人信息“告知——同意”的性质认定与规范解释[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 34(3): 111-124.