直播电商中即时互动对消费者冲动性购买行为的影响机制研究
A Study on the Mechanism of Instant Interaction in Live-Streaming E-Commerce Influencing Consumers’ Impulsive Purchasing Behaviour
摘要: 直播电商凭借其独特的即时互动性,已成为驱动消费的重要引擎,并显著激发了消费者的冲动性购买行为。然而,互动性究竟通过何种心理影响消费决策,其内在机制尚待深入揭示。本文基于经典的“刺激–机体–反应”(S-O-R)理论,构建并阐释了一个双路径整合模型。该模型提出,作为外部环境刺激的即时互动并非直接导致购买行为,而是通过激活消费者内在的机体状态,即并行的两条心理传导路径最终驱动冲动性购买的发生。这两条路径分别是:以社会临场感和信任为核心的社会——认知路径,其功能在于为冲动行为提供认知许可;以及以心流体验和积极情感为核心的情感——体验路径,其功能在于为冲动行为点燃情感引擎。本文系统地论证了该双路径模型的理论逻辑,为理解直播场景下的消费决策机制提供了整合性的分析框架。
Abstract: Live-streaming e-commerce, with its unique real-time interactivity, has become a significant engine driving consumption and markedly stimulates consumers’ impulse purchasing behaviour. However, the precise psychological “black box” through which interactivity influences consumption decisions remains to be thoroughly elucidated. This paper constructs and elucidates a dual-pathway integration model grounded in the classical “stimulus-organism-response” (S-O-R) theory. This model posits that real-time interaction, as an external environmental stimulus, does not directly precipitate purchasing behaviour. Instead, it ultimately drives impulsive buying by activating consumers’ internal organismic states through two parallel psychological transmission pathways. These pathways comprise: A socio-cognitive pathway centred on social presence and trust, functioning to provide cognitive licence for impulsive actions; an affective-experiential pathway centred on flow experiences and positive emotions, functioning to ignite the emotional engine driving impulsive behaviour. This paper systematically demonstrates the theoretical logic of this dual-pathway model, offering an integrated analytical framework for understanding consumer decision-making mechanisms within live-streaming contexts.
文章引用:秦健祥. 直播电商中即时互动对消费者冲动性购买行为的影响机制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 245-251. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14123852

参考文献

[1] 黄会婷. 直播的消费者行为影响研究[J]. 中国集体经济, 2025(8): 37-40.
[2] Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y. and Nie, K. (2019) How Live Streaming Influences Purchase Intentions in Social Commerce: An IT Affordance Perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, Article ID: 100886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 刘艺琴, 张梓宁. 电商直播互动对消费者购买意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2024, 77(6): 115-124.
[4] 黄文珺, 车兰兰. 电商直播情境下消费语言对在线消费者购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 价格月刊, 2024(3): 89-94.
[5] 陈婷, 丁宏昊, 周昊宇, 等. 直播电商弹幕内容与行为特征对消费者购买行为的影响研究——主播与产品关联度的调节效应[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2025, 9(2): 159-171.
[6] 谈丹, 刘洋辰, 李佩. 直播带货中社会临场感对冲动性消费的影响研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 22(9): 54-61.
[7] Rook, D.W. (1987) The Buying Impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 189-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1975) Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. Jossey-Bass.
[9] He, W. and Jin, C. (2022) A Study on the Influence of the Characteristics of Key Opinion Leaders on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Live Streaming Commerce: Based on Dual-Systems Theory. Electronic Commerce Research, 24, 1235-1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 龚潇潇, 叶作亮, 吴玉萍, 等. 直播场景氛围线索对消费者冲动消费意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(6): 875-882.
[11] Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2004) Consumer Trust in B2C E-Commerce and the Importance of Social Presence: Experiments in E-Products and E-Services. Omega, 32, 407-424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press.