大语言模型在乡村全面振兴评价中的应用
Application of Large Language Models in the Evaluation of Comprehensive Rural Revitalization
DOI: 10.12677/csa.2025.1512322, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王丽丽*:河北金融学院河北省科技金融重点实验室,河北 保定;河北金融学院统计与数据科学学院,河北 保定;张若楠, 张赛扬:河北金融学院统计与数据科学学院,河北 保定;佟 磊:河北软件职业技术学院,河北 保定
关键词: 乡村振兴大语言模型指标体系多Agent系统统计测度Rural Revitalization Large Language Model (LLM) Indicator System Multi-Agent System Statistical Measurement
摘要: 传统乡村振兴评价方法存在指标单一、数据更新滞后及维度失衡等局限,本研究提出基于大语言模型(LLM)的测度新方法。通过融合结构化统计数据与非结构化文本(政策、舆情),构建包含产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕五个维度涉及30个指标的评价体系;采用多Agent架构协同DeepSeek等大模型,结合基于情感分析的权重机制与冲突检测算法,实现精准评估。基于河北省2014~2023年数据的实证表明,十年间乡村振兴综合得分提升76.2%,五维度均显著增长,但区域差异明显。大语言模型驱动的多源融合测度框架有效克服传统评价方法的缺陷,为乡村振兴动态监测与精准施策提供科学工具。
Abstract: Traditional rural revitalization evaluation methods face limitations such as singular indicators, delayed data updates, and dimensional imbalances. This study proposes a novel measurement approach leveraging large language models (LLMs). By integrating structured statistical data with unstructured text (policies, public sentiment), an evaluation system encompassing five dimensions—thriving businesses, pleasant living environments, social etiquette and civility, effective governance, and prosperity—with 30 specific indicators was constructed. Utilizing a multi-agent architecture coordinated with LLMs like DeepSeek, and incorporating an emotion analysis-based weighting mechanism and conflict detection algorithm, precise assessment was achieved. Empirical analysis based on data from Hebei Province from 2014 to 2023 shows a 76.2% increase in the comprehensive rural revitalization score over the decade, with significant growth across all five dimensions, though regional disparities remain evident. The LLM-driven multi-source fusion measurement framework effectively overcomes the shortcomings of traditional evaluation methods, providing a scientific tool for dynamic monitoring and targeted interventions in rural revitalization.
文章引用:王丽丽, 张若楠, 张赛扬, 佟磊. 大语言模型在乡村全面振兴评价中的应用[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2025, 15(12): 66-76. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2025.1512322

参考文献

[1] 张挺, 李闽榕, 徐艳梅. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(8): 99-105.
[2] 金星晔, 左从江, 方明月, 等. 企业数字化转型的测度难题: 基于大语言模型的新方法与新发现[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 34-53.
[3] Fu, L. and Li, J. (2014) Comprehensive Evaluation and Research on China’s Public Culture Service System Based on AHP Method and Entropy Weight Method. Journal of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Research, 6, 230-238.
[4] 贺雪峰. 乡村治理的信息基础[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2024(3): 78-86.
[5] 黄季焜. 粮食安全与乡村振兴协同推进研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2024(4): 2-18.
[6] 徐雪, 王永瑜. 中国乡村振兴水平测度、区域差异分解及动态演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(5): 64-83.
[7] 毛锦凰, 王林涛. 乡村振兴评价指标体系研究[J]. 经济学家, 2020(12): 120-128.
[8] 李长亮, 李昊儒, 周美秀. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建及实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(22): 66-70.
[9] 赵忠亮. 乡村振兴评价指标体系研究——基于辽宁省县域层面的实证[J]. 农业经济, 2023(7): 61-62.