资本逻辑驱动下的数字虚假宣传及其法律规制
Digital False Advertising Driven by Capital Logic and Its Legal Regulation
摘要: 数字技术的迅猛发展促使虚假宣传演化出场景化、精准化与隐蔽化新形态,直播带货的沉浸式欺诈、算法推荐的定向误导、隐性广告的模糊侵权及流量造假的数据幻象,共同构成其典型表现。这些现象本质是资本逻辑主导下信息工具化的结果,资本通过操控信息符号、捕获用户注意力实现剩余价值攫取,对消费者知情权形成系统性威胁。当前规制体系面临多重困境,制度设计滞后导致平台责任套利,司法层面存在举证难与因果关系认定难问题,执法则遭遇取证阻碍与处罚威慑不足的挑战。对此,需构建平台全链条管理、司法规则优化、执法效能提升的多维度治理体系,结合跨部门协同共治与行业自律,推动信息回归公共交往属性,实现数字经济效率与公正的平衡。
Abstract: The rapid advancement of digital technology has propelled the evolution of false advertising into new contextualized, precision-driven, and concealed forms. It is characterized by typical manifestations including immersive fraud in live-streaming commerce, targeted misleading via algorithmic recommendations, ambiguous infringement through covert advertising, and data illusions generated by traffic manipulation. Fundamentally, these phenomena stem from the instrumentalization of information under the dominance of capital logic—capital appropriates surplus value by manipulating information symbols and capturing users’ attention, thereby posing a systemic threat to consumers’ right to know. The current regulatory system confronts multiple predicaments: outdated institutional frameworks facilitate platform liability arbitrage; judicial proceedings face challenges regarding the burden of proof and causation determination; and law enforcement encounters obstacles in evidence collection and insufficient deterrence from penalties. To mitigate these issues, a multi-faceted governance framework should be established, integrating full-chain platform management, judicial rule optimization, and enhanced law enforcement efficiency. Combined with cross-departmental collaborative governance and industry self-regulation, this framework aims to restore information’s inherent role as a medium for public communication, ultimately achieving a balance between efficiency and justice in the digital economy.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
徐博. 电商直播中我国食品虚假宣传监管现状与对策建议[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2021, 39(6): 22-27.
|
|
[2]
|
刘科, 黄博琛. 电商直播带货行为主体的法律责任及规制逻辑[J]. 江汉论坛, 2023(10): 139-144.
|
|
[3]
|
澎湃新闻. 卖假燕窝的辛巴公司再次道歉: 已赔付4143.9万, 赔完为止[EB/OL]. 2022-01-15. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_16293208, 2025-11-05.
|
|
[4]
|
文铭, 刘美余. 论大数据“杀熟”的法律规制研究[J]. 中国物价, 2025(7): 34-39.
|
|
[5]
|
人民日报. 网红李佳琦带货不粘锅“翻车”: 夸大宣传成普遍问题[EB/OL]. 2019-11-10. https://www.peopleapp.com/column/30036792325-500001841042, 2023-11-05.
|
|
[6]
|
湖南日报·新湖南客户端. 虚构观看量? 不正当竞争! 湖南一案例成全国第二批直播电商典型案例[EB/OL]. 2025-07-14. https://m.voc.com.cn/xhn/news/202507/29934172.html, 2025-11-08.
|
|
[7]
|
北京市市场监督管理局. 全国首案! 北京市市场监管局查办直播电商“职业弹幕人”网络虚假宣传案件[EB/OL]. 2025-06-21. https://scjgj.beijing.gov.cn/zwxx/scjgdt/202506/t20250623_4119777.html, 2025-11-08.
|
|
[8]
|
丁国峰, 蒋淼. 我国网络直播带货虚假宣传的法律规制——兼评《禁止网络不正当竞争行为规定(公开征求意见稿)》[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(8): 29-39.
|
|
[9]
|
张丁月. 论消费者知情权保护的法律问题研究[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2017(S1): 343-344.
|
|
[10]
|
刘雅婷, 李楠. 直播电商虚假宣传的法律规制[J]. 知识产权, 2021(5): 68-82.
|
|
[11]
|
新黄河. 炮制“养雌助排”概念, “辛选系”公司再领20万元虚假宣传罚单[EB/OL]. 2025-11-06. https://www.toutiao.com/article/7569391206199788051/?upstream_biz=doubao&source=m_redirect, 2025-11-08.
|
|
[12]
|
徐骏. 智能时代消费者知情权的困境与变革[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(3): 15-25.
|
|
[13]
|
李欣亮, 耿树海, 曹国振, 等. “直播带货”的消费风险及规避措施[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022(8): 65-67.
|