家族企业接班人谦卑对高管团队创新绩效的影响——团队内部冲突的中介作用
The Impact of Humility of Family Business Successors on the Innovation Performance of Executive Teams—The Mediating Role of Internal Team Conflicts
摘要: 在中国的特有文化传统中,谦卑型的领导风格广受推崇,这一特质通过促进团队内部建设性冲突的转化,间接提升高管团队创新绩效,这一中介作用在家族企业代际传承与组织创新转型中具有关键影响。已有研究探讨谦卑型领导与创新绩效的关系,但缺乏家族企业接班人视角的探索,对其中机制的研究也相对较少。本文基于人际吸引理论和双元冲突模型建构“接班人谦卑–团队内部冲突”的双路径模型,为家族企业的管理实践提供新的路径和更广阔的研究视角,采用跨层研究的方式构建接班人谦卑对团队创新绩效的影响过程的理论分析框架。研究发现,接班人关系谦卑正向影响团队创新绩效;接班人能力谦卑正向影响团队创新绩效;家族企业接班人关系谦卑负向影响高管团队内部关系冲突;家族企业内部高管团队关系冲突负向影响团队创新绩效;团队内部关系冲突在家族企业接班人关系谦卑对团队创新绩效的正向影响中起到中介作用;家族企业接班人能力谦卑正向影响高管团队内部任务冲突;家族企业内部高管团队任务冲突正向影响团队创新绩效;团队内部任务冲突在家族企业接班人能力谦卑对团队创新绩效的正向影响关系中起到中介作用。
Abstract: In China’s unique cultural traditions, the humble leadership style is widely respected. This trait indirectly enhances the innovation performance of the executive team by facilitating the transformation of constructive conflicts within the team. This mediating role plays a crucial role in the intergenerational succession of family businesses and the transformation of organizational innovation. Previous studies have explored the relationship between humble leadership and innovative performance, but there is a lack of exploration from the perspective of successors in family businesses, and research on the underlying mechanisms is also relatively scarce. This paper constructs a dual-path model of “successor humility-internal team conflict” based on interpersonal attraction theory and the dual conflict model, providing a new path and a broader research perspective for the management practice of family businesses. It adopts a cross-layer research approach to construct a theoretical analysis framework for the impact process of successor humility on team innovation performance. Research has found that a humble succession relationship positively influences team innovation performance. The successor’s humble ability positively influences the team’s innovative performance. The humble relationship among successors in family businesses negatively affects internal conflicts within the executive team. Conflicts within the executive team of a family business negatively affect the team’s innovation performance. Internal team relationship conflicts play a mediating role in the positive impact of humble succession relationships in family businesses on team innovation performance. The humble ability of the successor in a family business positively influences internal task conflicts within the executive team. The task conflicts within the executive team of a family business positively affect the team’s innovation performance. Internal task conflicts within the team play a mediating role in the positive impact relationship between the humble ability of successors in family businesses and the innovative performance of the team.
文章引用:李沛儿, 吴炯. 家族企业接班人谦卑对高管团队创新绩效的影响——团队内部冲突的中介作用[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(12): 84-95. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.1512313

参考文献

[1] 雷星晖, 吴甲春, 苏涛永, 等. 管理者谦卑、绩效期望落差与战略风险承担[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(5): 51-64.
[2] 储小平. 华人家族企业的界定[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2004(1): 49-53.
[3] 吴炯. 家族经营权涉入对经理人薪酬业绩敏感度的权变影响[J]. 财贸研究, 2013, 24(2): 122-128.
[4] 马凌远, 尤航. 代际传承与家族企业ESG表现——基于传承多阶段演进视角[J]. 财经论丛(浙江财经大学学报), 2025(3): 99-111.
[5] 李思飞, 王赛, 邓路. 家族企业代际传承与年报文本信息可读性[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(9): 172-186.
[6] Barach, J.A. and Ganitsky, J.B. (1995) Successful Succession in Family Business. Family Business Review, 8, 131-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 邹卓能, 石泳琳, 陈奕君. 继任者个人特征对家族企业代际传承的影响研究[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2025(2): 135-137.
[8] 尤树洋, 蔡亚华, 贾良定. CEO兼具自恋和谦卑特质与组织双元性的关系研究[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(5): 71-87.
[9] 陈璐, 黄丽. 基于性别调节作用的人格特质、领导身份认同与领导动机研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(1): 44-54.
[10] Owens, B.P. and Hekman, D.R. (2012) Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 787-818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 冯镜铭, 刘善仕, 吴坤津, 等. 谦卑型领导研究探析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2014, 36(3): 38-48.
[12] 傅端香, 张晴. “满招损, 谦受益”——谦卑型领导研究述评及展望[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 40(5): 124-137.
[13] Amason, A.C. (1996) Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] De Dreu, C.K.W. and Weingart, L.R. (2003) Task versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jehn, K.A. (1995) A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 邓新明, 刘禹, 龙贤义, 等. 高管团队职能异质性与企业绩效关系研究: 基于管理者认知和团队冲突的中介分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(3): 32-44.
[17] 王兴元, 姬志恒. 跨学科创新团队知识异质性与绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(3): 14-22.
[18] 张宏. 创业团队价值观异质性、团队冲突与团队凝聚力关系研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2014, 32(2): 90-93.
[19] 杨陈, 杨付, 景熠, 等. 谦卑型领导如何改善员工绩效: 心理需求满足的中介作用和工作单位结构的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(2): 121-134.
[20] 吕福新. 家族企业的资源短缺与理念接续——宁波方太厨具有限公司持续发展的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2003(12): 128-136.
[21] 张晴, 石培哲, 罗文峰, 等. 谦卑型领导对员工前瞻性行为的影响研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 24(1): 48-56.
[22] 倪清, 吴成颂, 徐慧, 等. 谦卑型文化与知识型员工创新绩效关系: 风险承担意愿与情感信任的链式中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(11): 132-139.
[23] 屈金照, 张丽华, 徐世勇. 领导谦卑影响员工越轨创新行为的作用机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(9): 165-182.
[24] 王雪冬, 郝志玲, 孟佳佳. 谦卑型领导有助于成熟企业的商业模式创新吗?——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(4): 251-263.
[25] 马香媛, 孟楠, 贾越. 高校创新团队冲突对团队绩效的影响——冲突处理策略的调节效应[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(Z1): 29-33.