基于ISSA_GWO算法的局部阴影下光伏MPPT的研究
Research on Photovoltaic MPPT under Local Shadow Based on ISSA_GWO Algorithm
DOI: 10.12677/iae.2025.134071, PDF,   
作者: 唐海波*:凌云科技集团有限责任公司,湖北 武汉;张 磊#:长江大学电子信息与电气工程学院,湖北 荆州
关键词: 光伏阵列局部阴影最大功率点跟踪多峰优化樽海鞘算法灰狼算法Photovoltaic Array Local Shadow Maximum Power Point Tracking Multi-Modal Optimization Salp Algorithm Grey Wolf Algorithm
摘要: 针对局部阴影下传统光伏系统最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法易陷入局部最优的问题,提出了一种新的控制模型——ISSA_GWO模型。该模型融合了樽海鞘算法的全局搜索能力和灰狼算法的局部开发特性。另外,该模型通过引入动态平衡因子调节SSA算法的全局和局部搜索权重,并结合差分进化策略优化领导者位置更新,从而有效提升了多峰场景下的寻优成功率。该算法与PSO、SSA、GWO算法在不同辐照条件下进行仿真对比实验,验证了ISSA_GWO算法在复杂阴影环境下具有更快的跟踪速率和更高的收敛精度,同时也具有更高的鲁棒性与效率,该算法为复杂阴影环境下的光伏系统提供更高效的MPPT解决方案。
Abstract: In order to solve the problem that the traditional MPPT algorithm of PV system is easy to fall into local optimal under local shadow, a new control model, ISSA_GWO model, is proposed. This model combines the global search ability of Salpa algorithm with the local development characteristic of gray Wolf algorithm. The global/local search weights of the SSA algorithm are adjusted by introducing dynamic balance factors, and the leader position update is optimized with differential evolution strategy, thus effectively improving the search success rate in multi-peak scenarios. The simulation and comparison experiments of this algorithm with PSO, SSA and GWO algorithms under different irradiation conditions verify that ISSA_GWO algorithm has faster tracking rate and higher convergence accuracy in complex shadow environment, and also has higher robustness and efficiency. This algorithm provides a more efficient MPPT solution for photovoltaic systems in complex shadow environment.
文章引用:唐海波, 张磊. 基于ISSA_GWO算法的局部阴影下光伏MPPT的研究[J]. 仪器与设备, 2025, 13(4): 582-592. https://doi.org/10.12677/iae.2025.134071

参考文献

[1] 伍浩松, 戴定, 赵畅. 国际能源署发布2050年净零排放路线图[J]. 国外核新闻, 2021(6): 17-22.
[2] Kim, J., Ho‐Baillie, A. and Huang, S. (2019) Review of Novel Passivation Techniques for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Solar RRL, 3, Article ID: 1800302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 范瑞祥, 尹国明, 苗洁蓉, 等. 基于参数辨识的光伏组件快速MPPT方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(2): 296-302.
[4] 姜萍, 栾艳军, 张伟, 等. 局部遮阴下基于改进PSO的多峰值MPPT研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(8): 140-145.
[5] 雷茂杰, 许坦奇, 孟凡英. 基于自适应粒子群算法的MPPT控制策略[J]. 电源技术, 2021, 45(8): 1036-1039.
[6] 李圣清, 吴文凤, 张煜文, 等. 基于GA的光伏MPPT变加速扰动法的研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2018, 55(8): 7-11.
[7] 周冬冬, 朱旋, 李士林. 基于樽海鞘算法结合电导增量法的MPPT方法研究[J]. 东北电力技术, 2024, 45(12): 32-36.
[8] 刘文锋, 李昂. 基于变步长扰动观察法结合改进天牛群优化算法的三步复合光伏最大功率跟踪算法[J]. 热力发电, 2022, 51(10): 138-144.
[9] Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M. and Lewis, A. (2014) Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 唐圣学, 张启然, 刘亚敬, 等. 太阳电池动态模型仿真分析及实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(9): 2536-2546.
[11] Esram, T. and Chapman, P.L. (2007) Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 22, 439-449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 沈磊, 徐岸非, 黄晴宇, 等. 基于GWO-P&O算法的局部阴影光伏MPPT研究[J]. 湖北工业大学学报, 2022, 37(2): 25-29+43.