西藏高中生心理健康的保护性因素和风险性因素
Protective and Risk Factors of Mental Health among High School Students in Xizang
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.1512628, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 宋 清*, 布苏皮·阿布都拉, 朱津漫：浙江师范大学心理学院，浙江 金华；岳 童：西南大学心理学部，重庆；李文俏#：浙江师范大学心理学院，浙江 金华；浙江师范大学，浙江省儿童青少年心理健康与危机干预智能实验室，浙江 金华
关键词: 西藏高中生；心理健康；中华民族心理融合；社会支持；欺凌；High School Students in Xizang； Mental Health； Chinese Ethnic Psychological Compatibility； Social Support； Bully
摘要: 目的：调查西藏自治区高中生的心理健康现状及其保护性因素和风险性因素。方法：选取西藏某市高中学生8766名，测量心理健康、体育运动时间、电子屏幕时间、中华民族心理融合、社会支持、班级欺凌普遍程度等变量。结果：6.07%的学生存在心理健康问题。多元线性回归分析显示，中华民族心理融合(β = −0.025, P < 0.05)和社会支持(β = −0.275, P < 0.001)负向预测心理健康问题水平，电子屏幕时间(β = 0.038, P < 0.001)和班级欺凌普遍程度(β = 0.232, P < 0.001)正向预测心理健康问题水平，体育运动时间(β = −0.004, P = 0.727)无法预测心理健康问题水平。结论：西藏高中生的心理健康总体良好，中华民族心理融合和社会支持是保护性因素，电子屏幕使用时间和班级欺凌普遍程度是风险性因素。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate mental health among high school students in Xizang Autonomous Region as well as its protective and risk factors. Method: We recruited 8766 high school students from a city in Xizang. The study measured mental health, Chinese ethnic psychological compatibility, social support, prevalence of bullying in class, physical activity time, and electronic screen time. Results: Among the participants, 6.07% of students had mental health problems. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that Chinese ethnic psychological compatibility (β = −0.025, P < 0.05) and social support (β = −0.275, P < 0.001) negatively predicted mental health problems; electronic screen time (β = 0.038, P < 0.001) and prevalence of bullying in class (β = 0.232, P < 0.001) positively predicted mental health problems; physical activity time (β = −0.004, P = 0.727) failed to predict mental health problems. Conclusion: High school students in Xizang have good mental health in general. Chinese ethnic psychological compatibility and social support are protective factors, while prevalence of bullying in class and electronic screen time are risk factors.
文章引用：宋清, 布苏皮·阿布都拉, 朱津漫, 岳童, 李文俏 (2025). 西藏高中生心理健康的保护性因素和风险性因素. 心理学进展, 15(12), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.1512628

参考文献

[1] 曾欣然, 汪玥, 丁俊浩, 周晖(2019). 班级欺凌规范与欺凌行为: 群体害怕与同辈压力的中介作用. 心理学报, 51(8), 935-944.
[2] 陈作为, 刘国, 樊园媛, 王元, 唐子扬, 张新风, 涂哲明(2023). 荆州市10-19岁青少年心理健康状况及影响因素分析.现代医院, 23(9), 1430-1434.
[3] 傅承哲, 杨爱平(2018). 香港青年国家认同的心理融合机制. 当代青年研究, (6), 117-122.
[4] 傅承哲, 周子玥(2020). 内地港澳大学生国家认同的心理融合机制比较研究. 青年探索, (2), 99-112.
[5] 傅小兰, 张侃(2023). 中国国民心理健康发展报告(2021-2022). 社会科学文献出版社.
[6] 郭燕, 周珂, 魏高峡(2023). 儿童青少年运动教育的全脑重塑作用: 基于心理健康与心理能力发展的双重视角分析. 首都体育学院学报, 35(5), 465-474.
[7] 郝玉玺, 王小康, 潘秋予, 麦陈耀, 张金鹏, 王宣儿, 胡军(2023). 山东省高中生心理健康影响因素分析. 中国健康教育, 39(7), 579-585+595.
[8] 江南, 朱丹, 归桑拉姆, 旦增卓玛, 罗平(2014). 西藏中学生心理教育体系的建构. 教育与教学研究, 28(1), 37-41.
[9] 梁芳美, 赵玉芳, 尹晨祖(2023). 共同内群体认同促进民族心理融合: 积极解释偏向的中介作用. 心理科学, 46(2), 386-393.
[10] 林德荣, 蔡沙沙(2023). 闽台宗亲联结提升台湾青年国家认同的机制研究. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 73(4), 79-92.
[11] 刘福荣, 宋晓琴, 尚小平, 吴梦凡, 隋美丽, 董一超, 刘新奎(2020). 中学生抑郁症状检出率的meta分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 34(2), 123-128.
[12] 刘双娟, 泽塔多吉, 蒋迎九, 普布索朗, 德庆拉措, 廖娟, 杨德雨(2022). 高原地区某中学高三学生心理健康状况及其影响因素分析. 中国医药导报, 19(14), 43-47.
[13] 卢丹丹, 李芳, 王慧豪, 官越, 格桑曲珍, 袁靓, 燕红, 俞斌(2024). 初中生校园欺凌与心理亚健康的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 38(2), 104-108.
[14] 马慧芳, 罗平, 马海林, 汪念念(2012). 藏族中学生的心理健康状况. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(5), 399-400.
[15] 彭海云, 盛靓, 王金睿, 周姿言, 辛素飞(2023). 2001-2019年我国青少年孤独感的变迁: 横断历史研究的视角. 心理发展与教育, 39(3), 449-456.
[16] 唐金晖, 赵晓雅, 李佳慧(2023). 青少年校园欺凌与抑郁的心理中介因素综述. 心理月刊, 18(12), 237-240.
[17] 王极盛(1983). 青年心理学. 中国社会科学出版社.
[18] 王晓炜(2020). 高中生心理健康影响因素及应对策略分析. 校园心理, 18(4), 354-356.
[19] 杨金花, 金盛华(2017). 贫富群体心理融合中的“道德突显现象”. 心理学探新, 37(2), 166-171.
[20] 杨莉萍, 程永佳, 陈雅清(2015). 少数民族大学生群体态度与心理健康——内外群体社会支持的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (7), 86-91.
[21] 杨阳, 蒋丽玮, 罗欢, 李安祺, 汪旭虹, 曹俊(2024). 感知理解对心理融合的促进效应. 心理科学, 47(6), 1475-1485.
[22] 张亚利, 靳娟娟, 俞国良(2022). 2010-2020中国内地初中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 30(5), 965-977.
[23] 赵霞(2022). 陷入“谷底”的高中生心理健康——基于中美日韩四国的比较. 中国青年研究, (9), 106-113.
[24] 赵玉芳, 包燕, 肖子伦, 李骐, 梁芳美(2020). 文化混搭对群体心理融合的影响: 经验开放性的调节作用. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 43(4), 50-58.
[25] 祝婷, 李凌智, 温芳芳, 佐斌, 鞠一琰, 龙佳慧(2024). 共同内群体认同的心理效应及其影响因素. 心理科学, 47(2), 440-449.
[26] Bao, Y., Zhao, Y., Xiao, Z., Liang, F., Wang, W., & li, B. (2020). Fusion of “You and Me”: Cultural Mixing Promotes Intergroup Psychological Compatibility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51, 353-369.[CrossRef] 
[27] Biddle, S. J. H., Ciaccioni, S., Thomas, G., & Vergeer, I. (2019). Physical Activity and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: An Updated Review of Reviews and an Analysis of Causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 146-155.[CrossRef] 
[28] Chau, K., Bhattacherjee, A., Senapati, A., Guillemin, F., & Chau, N. (2022). Association between Screen Time and Cumulating School, Behavior, and Mental Health Difficulties in Early Adolescents: A Population-Based Study. Psychiatry Research, 310, Article 114467.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social Support as an Organizing Concept for Criminology: Presidential Address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527-559.[CrossRef] 
[30] Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the Malleability of Automatic Attitudes: Combating Automatic Prejudice with Images of Admired and Disliked Individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.[CrossRef] 
[31] Derrogatis, L., Lipman, R., & Covi, I. J. P. B. (1973). The SCL-90: An Outpatient Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13-28.
[32] Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2016). Identity Conflict or Compatibility: A Comparison of Muslim Minorities in Five European Cities. Political Psychology, 37, 447-463.[CrossRef] 
[33] He, J., Zhao, Y., Chen, B., Bao, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2024). Similarity Enhances Psychological Compatibility: Serial Mediation Effect of Psychological Kinship and Intergroup Contact. Heliyon, 10, e36262.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Källmén, H., & Hallgren, M. (2021). Bullying at School and Mental Health Problems among Adolescents: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 15, 1-7.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Li, L., Zhang, Q., Zhu, L., Zeng, G., Huang, H., Zhuge, J. et al. (2022). Screen Time and Depression Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article ID: 1058572.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Magson, N. R., Freeman, J. Y., Rapee, R. M., Richardson, C. E., Oar, E. L., & Fardouly, J. (2021). Risk and Protective Factors for Prospective Changes in Adolescent Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 44-57.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Mai, Y., Wu, Y. J., & Huang, Y. (2021). What Type of Social Support Is Important for Student Resilience during COVID-19? A Latent Profile Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 646145.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Rougier, M., Muller, D., Courset, R., Smeding, A., Devos, T., & Batailler, C. (2020). Toward the Use of Approach/Avoidance Tendencies as Attitude Measures: Individual‐ and Group‐Level Variability of the Ingroup Bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 857-875.[CrossRef] 
[39] Wang, W., Du, X., Guo, Y., Li, W., Zhang, S., Zhang, W. et al. (2021). Associations among Screen Time, Sleep Duration and Depressive Symptoms among Chinese Adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 69-74.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Wu, J., Zhang, X., & Xiao, Q. (2024). The Longitudinal Relationship between Cyberbullying Victimization and Loneliness among Chinese Middle School Students: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Social Support and the Moderating Effect of Sense of Hope. Behavioral Sciences, 14, Article 312.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Yang, C., Gao, H., Li, Y., Wang, E., Wang, N., & Wang, Q. (2022). Analyzing the Role of Family Support, Coping Strategies and Social Support in Improving the Mental Health of Students: Evidence from Post COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 1064898.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.[CrossRef]