针对前次IVF流产患者冷冻胚胎移植策略的综述:直接移植与PGT-A筛选的深度剖析与循证决策
A Review of Frozen Embryo Transfer Strategies for Patients with Previous IVF Pregnancy Loss: In-depth Analysis and Evidence-Based Decision-Making Regarding Direct Transfer vs. PGT-A Screening
摘要: 经历体外受精(IVF)妊娠丢失并拥有剩余冷冻胚胎的患者面临关键的临床决策。本文系统综述了直接移植与PGT-A筛选两种策略的有效性、安全性及适用人群。多项研究表明,尽管植入前非整倍体遗传学检测(PGT-A)旨在优选整倍体胚胎,但其流程中的胚胎操作损伤与可移植胚胎的绝对减少,可能导致其累积活产率反而低于形态学选择的直接移植策略。此外,复发性流产(RPL)人群的胚胎整倍体率因其病因异质性,显著低于因单基因病行单基因疾病植入前遗传学检测(PGT-M)的人群,这限制了PGT-A在此类人群中的“筛选收益”。本综述整合最新研究,提出了一个基于“获益–损伤–损耗”三角模型的临床决策框架,强调对于多数IVF流产患者,直接移植是追求累积活产的更优策略,而PGT-A的应用应严格限定于经过筛选的特定亚组,并需进行充分的知情同意。
Abstract: Patients who have experienced in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy loss and possess remaining cryopreserved embryos face critical clinical decisions. This article systematically reviews the effectiveness, safety, and applicable populations of two strategies: direct frozen embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) screening. Multiple studies indicate that although PGT-A aims to select euploid embryos, the procedural manipulations involved in embryo biopsy and the absolute reduction in transferable embryos may result in a lower cumulative live birth rate compared with the direct transfer of morphologically selected embryos. Furthermore, due to etiologic heterogeneity, the euploidy rate in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is significantly lower than in those undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), which limits the potential “screening benefit” of PGT-A in this population. Integrating the latest research, this review proposes a clinical decision-making framework based on a “Benefit-Injury-Depletion” triangle model. It emphasizes that, for most IVF patients with prior pregnancy loss, direct embryo transfer is the superior strategy for achieving cumulative live birth, while the application of PGT-A should be strictly limited to carefully selected subgroups and accompanied by thorough informed consent.
文章引用:苏明娇, 曹旭, 付晓杰, 高璐. 针对前次IVF流产患者冷冻胚胎移植策略的综述:直接移植与PGT-A筛选的深度剖析与循证决策[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(12): 929-935. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15123487

参考文献

[1] Ata, B., Kalafat, E. and Somigliana, E. (2021) A New Definition of Recurrent Implantation Failure on the Basis of Anticipated Blastocyst Aneuploidy Rates across Female Age. Fertility and Sterility, 116, 1320-1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Dang, T., Phung, T.M., Le, H., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, T.S., Nguyen, T.L.H., et al. (2019) Preimplantation Genetic Testing of Aneuploidy by Next Generation Sequencing: Association of Maternal Age and Chromosomal Abnormalities of Blastocyst. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7, 4427-4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Mei, Y., Wang, Y., He, L., Zheng, J., Lin, Y. and Wang, F. (2024) Performance of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy for Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Repeated Implantation Failure. Heliyon, 10, e31983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Martin, A., et al. (2023) Mosaic Results after Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy May Be Accompanied by Changes in Global Gene Expression. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 10, Article ID: 1180689.
[5] Wang, S.F. and Seifer, D.B. (2025) Comparative Age-Stratified Analysis of Live-Birth Outcomes in Primary Embryo Transfer to Assess the Effect of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 146, 898-906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Cai, H., Kirshenbaum, M., Zhang, D., Bai, H., Li, W., Xue, X., et al. (2025) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on Previously Cryopreserved Unbiopsied Blastocysts: A Cohort Study in Women with IVF Pregnancy Loss. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 23, Article No. 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mason-Otey, A. and Seifer, D.B. (2025) United States Racial/Ethnic Disparities in PGT-A Use: An Analysis of 2014-2020 SART CORS Database. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 23, Article No. 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Revelli, A., Canosa, S., Carosso, A., Filippini, C., Paschero, C., Gennarelli, G., et al. (2019) Impact of the Addition of Early Embryo Viability Assessment to Morphological Evaluation on the Accuracy of Embryo Selection on Day 3 or Day 5: A Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Ovarian Research, 12, Article No. 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Irani, M., Zaninovic, N., Canon, C., O’Neill, C., Gunnala, V., Zhan, Q., et al. (2018) A Rationale for Biopsying Embryos Reaching the Morula Stage on Day 6 in Women Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. Human Reproduction, 33, 935-941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Lal, A., Kranyak, A., Blalock, J., Athavale, D., Barré, A., Doran, A., et al. (2022) Apoptotic qPCR Gene Expression Array Analysis Demonstrates Proof-of-Concept for Rapid Blastocoel Fluid-Conditioned Media Molecular Prediction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39, 1515-1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Theodorou, E., Jones, B.P., Cardenas Armas, D.F., Heath, C., Serhal, P. and Ben-Nagi, J. (2022) Live Birth Rate Following a Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Is Not Affected by Double Vitrification and Warming at Cleavage or Blastocyst Stage. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39, 987-993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Ziogas, A.C., Liasidi, P., Katouna, A., Koutsouni, A., Faki, K., Karangeli, E., et al. (2025) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Fertility Success Story. Cureus, 17, e84084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Nair, J., Shetty, S., Kasi, C.I., Thondehalmath, N., Ganesh, D., Bhat, V.R., et al. (2022) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A)—A Single-Center Experience. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39, 729-738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Guo, Q.Q., et al. (2023) Growth Hormone Supplementation Ameliorates Blastocyst Euploidy Rates and Improves Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14, Article ID: 1117706.
[15] Homer, H.A. (2019) Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT‐A): The Biology, the Technology and the Clinical Outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 59, 317-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Akin-Olugbade, O., Jain, T. and Komorowski, A. (2025) A Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 80, 169-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Banti, M., Al Bishtawi, M., Van Zyl, E., Kafetzis, D. and Griffin, D.K. (2025) Evaluating Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (niPGT-A) from Spent Culture Medium: Prolonged Embryo Culture to Day 6 Increases Informativity without Negatively Impacting Quality and Live Birth Rates. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 42, 2597-2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zhao, D., Zhao, G., Fan, J., Chen, H., Lopriore, E. and Li, X. (2021) Live Birth Rate of Twin Pregnancies after Frozen Embryo Transfer: Natural Cycle versus Ovulation Induction Regimens. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 304, 619-626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zhou, T., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Jiang, W., Zhang, Q., et al. (2021) Effects of PGT-A on Pregnancy Outcomes for Young Women Having One Previous Miscarriage with Genetically Abnormal Products of Conception. Reproductive Sciences, 28, 3265-3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Cao, M.Z., et al. (2022) Analysis of Aneuploidy Rate and Pregnancy Outcomes in Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Couples with Chromosome Polymorphism after PGT-A. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article ID: 803988.
[21] 袁牧, 张荣荣, 宋雪梅, 等. PGT-A技术在反复妊娠丢失和高龄人群辅助生殖治疗中的应用[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(11): 833-838.
[22] 单红英, 周平, 李蓉. 多囊卵巢综合征患者子宫内膜容受性异常机制研究[J/OL]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2023. 2023-04-25.[CrossRef
[23] Kuwabara, Y., Shiraishi, T., Kato, R., et al. (2025) Reply to Comment on “Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights from Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias”. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 24, e12668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 刘曼曼, 徐诗联, 张贺博, 等. 低分子肝素及胚胎植入前非整倍体检测对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2024, 33(5): 321-326.
[25] 张坤, 马晓慧, 王萍, 等. 复发性流产及高龄患者行PGT-A治疗的妊娠结局分析[J]. 新疆医学, 2024(9): 1071-1075.
[26] Sills, E.S., Obregon-Tito, A.J., Gao, H., McWilliams, T.K., Gordon, A.T., Adams, C.A., et al. (2017) Pathogenic Variant in NLRP7 (19q13.42) Associated with Recurrent Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Data from Early Embryo Development Observed during in Vitro Fertilization. Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine, 44, 40-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 李哲涛, 李伍高, 唐永梅, 等. 高龄, 复发性流产和反复种植失败患者胚胎植入前遗传学筛查结果分析[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2021, 8(10): 1-4.
[28] Weizel, I., Shavit, T., Shuli, Y., Adler Lazarovich, C., Halevi, R., Ben Ari, T., et al. (2024) Outcomes of BRCA Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing According to the Parental Mutation Origin: A Cohort Study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 22, Article No. 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] 杨小璇, 王菁, 沈鉴东, 等. 不同特征患者胚胎植入前遗传学检测结果和治疗结局分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020, 29(7): 857-864.
[30] Rajendran, S., Brendel, M., Barnes, J., Zhan, Q., Malmsten, J.E., Zisimopoulos, P., et al. (2024) Automatic Ploidy Prediction and Quality Assessment of Human Blastocysts Using Time-Lapse Imaging. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 79, 725-726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 王统菲, 贺立颖, 康晓敏, 等. 阿司匹林对早期复发性流产患者子宫血液动力学的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(4): 518-522.