引入动态GRA-退出倍数法的煤炭企业价值评估研究
Coal Enterprise Valuation with the Dynamic GRA-Exit Multiple Method
摘要: 针对周期性行业估值中可比公司筛选的主观性问题,本文创新性地将动态分辨系数引入灰色关联分析,并以此为核心构建了一个全新的两阶段估值框架。该框架首先通过FCFF模型捕捉详细预测期的企业价值,继而运用经改进灰色关联法校准的退出倍数计算终值,从而将长期不确定性转化为可控的中期市场比较问题。应用于煤炭企业A公司的案例显示,其估值误差由传统方法的8.31%降至1.66%,验证了动态分辨系数机制在提升估值准确性方面的关键作用。本研究为评估受宏观周期显著影响的企业价值提供了更为科学、可靠的方法论。
Abstract: To address the issue of subjectivity in selecting comparable companies for the valuation of cyclical industries, this study innovatively introduces a dynamic distinction coefficient into the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and constructs a novel two-stage valuation framework centered around this improvement. The framework first captures the enterprise value during the detailed forecast period using the Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) model. It then calculates the terminal value by applying an exit multiple calibrated through the improved GRA method, thereby transforming long-term uncertainties into a manageable problem of medium-term market comparison. A case application on Coal Company A demonstrates that the valuation error is reduced from 8.31% using the traditional method to 1.66%, validating the critical role of the dynamic distinction coefficient mechanism in enhancing valuation accuracy. This research provides a more scientific and reliable methodology for valuing enterprises significantly affected by macroeconomic cycles.
文章引用:魏欣, 杨毅. 引入动态GRA-退出倍数法的煤炭企业价值评估研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2025, 14(6): 1481-1491. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2025.146166

参考文献

[1] Fisher, I. (1906) The Nature of Capital and Income. The Macmillan Company.
[2] Kaldor, N. (1938) [Review of The Theory of Investment Value, by J. B. Williams]. Journal of Political Economy, 46, 555-557.
[3] Gordon, M.J. (1959) The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation. R. D. Irwin.
[4] Ohlson, J.A. (1995) Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 661-687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Jackson, A. (1996) The How and Why of Eva® at CS First Boston. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9, 98-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Campbell, J.A. (2002) Real Options Analysis of the Timing of IS Investment Decisions. Information & Management, 39, 337-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Caridi, M., Moretto, A., Perego, A. and Tumino, A. (2014) The Benefits of Supply Chain Visibility: A Value Assessment Model. International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Fan, B. and Yuan, Y. (2018) Constructing an Assessment Index System for Strategic Risk Management in Coal Science and Technology Enterprises. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26, 653-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chen, K., Xu, L., Chen, Y., Bi, Z. and Yi, J. (2018) Safety Culture Assessment of Coal Mine Enterprise. Procedia Engineering, 26, 1939-1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yang, Q., Hou, X. and Zhang, L. (2019) Measurement of Natural and Cyclical Excess Capacity in China’s Coal Industry. Energy Policy, 118, 270-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] He, Y. and Lin, B. (2020) Time-Varying Effects of Cyclical Fluctuations in China’s Energy Industry on the Macro Economy and Carbon Emissions. Energy, 155, 1102-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 胡悦. 基于模糊层次分析法的软件企业价值评估探究[J]. 现代商业, 2015(14): 219-220.
[13] 张晓清. REVA模型在新三板市场的适用性研究[J]. 甘肃金融, 2014(15): 44-46.
[14] 郜志宇. 经济剧烈波动条件下矿业企业价值评估研究——以铁矿企业为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2015.
[15] 陈蕾, 于田. 谈退出倍数法的理论框架及其在周期性公司估值中的应用[J]. 财会月刊, 2017(19): 53-58
[16] 马轶芳. 宏观经济因素对周期性公司估值收益额影响的测度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2017.
[17] 侯慧敏. 周期性行业论析[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(3): 31-35.
[18] 邓可. 煤炭企业价值评估方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2018.
[19] 王晋华. EVA与我国煤炭上市公司企业价值的相关性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西财经大学, 2020.
[20] 刘欣童. 基于X公司的周期性行业企业价值评估方法研究[J]. 广西质量监督导报, 2021(1): 110-111.
[21] 袁惊柱. 低碳转型背景下煤炭消费率先达峰的路径与政策研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(2): 12-22.