网络直播打赏行为的法律性质界定
The Legal Nature Definition of Tipping Behavior in Online Live Streaming
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14123932, PDF,   
作者: 景周阳:贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 网络直播打赏服务合同赠与合同Online Live Streaming Tipping Service Contract Gift Contract
摘要: 当前网络直播行业蓬勃发展,直播打赏已成为平台与主播的主要营收模式,但其法律性质的界定始终是理论界与实务界的争议焦点,相关纠纷的裁判结果常因定性分歧而呈现同案不同判。现有学说多陷入单一属性认知误区,均难以覆盖打赏行为的复杂性。本文以打赏目的为核心构建类型化界定体系,常规消费型打赏应认定为网络服务合同,主播提供的服务与用户打赏构成对待给付,特殊目的型打赏应定性为赠与合同,用户无对价期待。同时,针对未成年人打赏、赃款打赏、附条件打赏等特殊场景,需结合主体适格性、款项合法性、义务约定等细化定性规则,明确各方权利义务与责任边界。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the current online live-streaming industry, tipping in live streams has become the core revenue model for platforms and streamers. However, the legal nature of such tipping has always been a focal point of debate between academia and practice, and the rulings on related disputes often vary for the same case due to differences in legal characterization. Existing theories often fall into the misconception of single-attribute recognition and fail to fully capture the complexity of tipping behavior. This article constructs a typified classification system centered on the purpose of tipping. Regular consumer-oriented tipping should be recognized as an online service contract, where the services provided by the streamer and the users’ tips constitute reciprocal consideration. Tipping for special purposes should be characterized as a gift contract, where the user has no expectation of consideration. Meanwhile, for special scenarios such as underage tipping, tipping with illicit funds, and conditional tipping, it is necessary to refine the rules of characterization by considering aspects such as the eligibility of the parties, the legality of the funds, and the stipulated obligations, in order to clarify the rights, obligations, and boundaries of liability for all parties involved.
文章引用:景周阳. 网络直播打赏行为的法律性质界定[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 850-857. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14123932

参考文献

[1] 黎四奇, 王威. 网络秀场直播法律规制调适问题解析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(6): 90-103.
[2] 熊金才, 孙焱. 以夫妻共同财产打赏的合同性质研究[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 37(11): 61-68, 95.
[3] 曹钰. 网络直播中“打赏”行为法律性质的认定[J]. 法治论坛, 2020(1): 340-347.
[4] 朱晓娟, 卢世际. 直播平台内观众与主播间法律关系的性质研究[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2024, 39(4): 57-67.
[5] 潘红艳, 罗团. 网络直播打赏的法律性质认定及撤销权行使[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2018, 31(4): 92-99.
[6] 张佩玲, 姚志伟. 网络直播打赏行为性质新论[J]. 福建江夏学院学报, 2023, 13(2): 54-62.
[7] 张玉涛. 未成年人直播打赏纠纷的学理审视与实践反思[J]. 数字法治, 2023(4): 174-190.
[8] 范明志, 杨阳. 论直播打赏的性质与法律规制方式[J]. 求是学刊, 2024, 51(5): 8, 131-142.
[9] 刘海安. 论网络直播用户与主播之间的法律关系属性[J]. 政治与法律, 2023(1): 124-142.
[10] 汪洋. 夫妻一方直播打赏的性质、效力与后果——以《民法典婚姻家庭编解释二》第6条为中心[J]. 中国法律评论, 2025(3): 32-43.
[11] 程啸, 樊竟合. 网络直播中未成年人充值打赏行为的法律分析[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2019(3): 1-15.
[12] 孟强, 张静静. 善意取得抑或赃款追缴——赃款直播打赏民刑交叉问题的实证研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(2): 105-120.
[13] 纪艳琼, 唐静静. 附义务赠与合同的认定及赠与人的救济方式[J]. 人民司法, 2024(24): 81-85.
[14] 荀瑶. 网络直播的互动仪式探析[J]. 学术交流, 2018(5): 140-146.
[15] 王长潇, 李爽. 网络视频直播平台发展及其对商业场域建构的影响[J]. 当代传播, 2017(1): 54-56.
[16] 杜启顺. 数字消费场景下直播打赏经济的协同治理——基于流通经济学与民法学的双重视角[J]. 中国流通经济, 2025, 39(11): 44-56.