算法推荐下电商短视频平台版权治理的制度重构
The Institutional Reconstruction of Copyright Governance of E-Commerce Short Video Platforms under Algorithm Recommendation
摘要: 本文聚焦算法推荐时代电商短视频平台的版权治理困境,指出传统治理框架在平台角色转型、技术赋能与制度规制协同等方面存在失效逻辑。通过解构现有法律规制、平台治理及技术治理层面的内在机理,揭示规模化侵权、商业利益冲突及立法滞后等核心问题。提出在法律层面为电商短视频平台设定过滤义务,从法律规制升级、行政监管强化及事后权利救济三个维度设计制度重构路径,旨在实现平台责任与创作自由的动态平衡。
Abstract: This paper focuses on the copyright governance dilemma of e-commerce short video platforms in the era of algorithm recommendation, and points out that the traditional governance framework has failed logic in terms of platform role transformation, technology empowerment and institutional regulation coordination. By deconstructing the internal mechanisms of existing legal regulation, platform governance, and technical governance, this paper reveals core issues such as large-scale infringement, commercial conflicts of interest, and legislative lag. It is proposed to set filtering obligations for e-commerce short video platforms at the legal level, and design a system reconstruction path from three dimensions: upgrading legal regulation, strengthening administrative supervision and post-event rights relief, aiming to achieve a dynamic balance between platform responsibility and creative freedom.
文章引用:朱夕琳. 算法推荐下电商短视频平台版权治理的制度重构[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14123954

参考文献

[1] 初萌. 算法推荐平台版权注意义务: 法理解构与规范路径[J]. 知识产权, 2024(8): 99-113.
[2] 北京市海淀区人民法院(2018)京0108民初49421号民事判决书[Z].
[3] 冯晓青, 许耀乘. 破解短视频版权治理困境: 社会治理模式的引入与构建[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2020, 27(10): 56-76+127.
[4] 易继明. 论短视频著作权侵权[J]. 版权理论与实务, 2024(9): 4-5.
[5] 李晓宇. 电商短视频平台算法推荐侵权的体系化规制[J]. 河北法学, 2025, 43(6): 147-163.
[6] 来小鹏, 叶胜男. 论数字传播时代网络平台版权过滤机制的完善——兼谈“必要措施”的司法适用标准[J]. 中国出版, 2025(13): 36-42.
[7] Bechtel, M. (2020) Algorithmic Notification and Monetization: Using Youtube’s Content Id System as a Model for European Union Copyright Reform. Michigan State International Law Review, 28, 237-239.
[8] 易健雄. 从算法技术看网络服务提供者的“应当知道”——也谈《民法典》第1197条的适用[J]. 知识产权, 2021(12): 28-39.
[9] 任安麒. 算法服务提供者版权过滤义务的理论证成与规范构造[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2025, 28(4): 79-101.
[10] 江苏省无锡市中级人民法院(2022)苏02民终4040号民事判决书[Z].
[11] 崔国斌. 论网络服务商版权内容过滤义务[J]. 中国法学, 2017(2): 215-237.
[12] Republic of Poland v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union, CJEU Case C-401/19 (2019).