电商发展的哲学伦理审视:数据隐私与消费者自主性的困境
A Philosophical-Ethical Inquiry into E-Commerce Development: The Dilemma of Data Privacy and Consumer Autonomy
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14123990, PDF,   
作者: 陈 锐:贵州大学哲学学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 电子商务数据隐私自主性伦理E-Commerce Data Privacy Autonomy Ethics
摘要: 本文旨在对电子商务发展中所引发的两个核心哲学伦理问题进行系统性分析。首先,本文将探讨数据与隐私问题,基于康德的义务论哲学理论,分析电商平台将用户视为工具而非目的的行为本质,并审视知情同意原则在实践中的失效现象。其次,本文将聚焦于消费者选择与自由的悖论,结合行为经济学与自由主义家长制理论,揭示电商环境通过成瘾性设计、选择过载与算法引导等手段,对消费者真实选择的自主性带来的威胁。本文认为,电商的现行模式在哲学伦理层面上面临着严峻的挑战,即技术效率与人的主体性价值之间的冲突。解决这一冲突需要在政策规制、技术设计与商业伦理上进行深刻的反思与重构。
Abstract: This paper aims to conduct a systematic analysis of two core philosophical and ethical issues arising from the development of e-commerce. First, it will explore the problems of data and privacy, analyze the essential nature of e-commerce platforms treating users as tools rather than ends based on Kant’s deontological philosophy, and examine the failure of the principle of informed consent in practice. Second, it will focus on the paradox of consumers’ choice and freedom, and combined with behavioral economics and libertarian paternalism theory, reveal the threats posed by e-commerce environments to the autonomy of consumers’ real choices through means such as addictive design, choice overload and algorithmic guidance. This paper holds that the current model of e-commerce is confronted with severe challenges at the philosophical and ethical level, namely the conflict between technological efficiency and the subjective value of human beings. Resolving this conflict requires in-depth reflection and reconstruction in policy regulation, technological design and business ethics
文章引用:陈锐. 电商发展的哲学伦理审视:数据隐私与消费者自主性的困境[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 1291-1296. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14123990

参考文献

[1] Rochet, J. and Tirole, J. (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 990-1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.
[3] Srnicek, N. (2017) Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
[4] Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. and Smith, M.D. (2010) Research Commentary—Long Tails vs. Superstars: The Effect of Information Technology on Product Variety and Sales Concentration Patterns. Information Systems Research, 21, 736-747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] O’Neil, C. (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
[6] Pariser, E. (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
[7] 刘易齐, 徐贤, 龙宇. 面向团队场景的无证书云数据完整性授权审计方案研究[J/OL]. 计算机学报: 1-19.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1826.TP.20251119.0932.002, 2025-11-10.
[8] 康德. 李秋零, 主编. 《康德著作全集》第4卷[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
[9] 李凤景, 朱光, 吴晗逸. 悖论存在与理性消解: 移动健康App用户持续隐私披露行为影响机制研究[J/OL]. 现代情报: 1-29.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/22.1182.G3.20250610.2229.002, 2025-10-28.
[10] 黄蓉, 甘宜涛. 数字化转型背景下数字技术的伦理风险与化解路径[J/OL]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版): 1-10.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/41.1429.C.20250916.0833.002, 2025-10-29.
[11] 鞠雪楠, 赵宣凯, 孙宝文. 跨境电商平台克服了哪些贸易成本?——来自“敦煌网”数据的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(2): 181-196.
[12] 王天恩. 智能化时代隐私新问题及其应对[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(3): 14-22.
[13] Schwartz, B. (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Ecco.
[14] Ertemel, A.V. (2019) Technology Addiction in the Attention Economy and Possible Solutions. International Social Innovation Congress 2019, Istanbul, 16-17 October 2019, 19.
[15] 向超, 卢娴. 数字成瘾: 形成机理、风险审视与规制进路[J]. 电子政务, 2024(12): 108-120.
[16] 郝丽敏. “经济人”假设中人本性的缺失——从马克思主义政治经济学的视域出发[J]. 理论建设, 2019(5): 86-90.
[17] 以赛亚∙伯林. 自由论[M]. 胡传胜, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2011.
[18] 理查德∙塞勒, 卡斯∙桑斯坦. 助推[M]. 姜智勇, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2023.
[19] 丛杭青, 王晓梅. 何谓Autonomy? [J]. 哲学研究, 2013(1): 108-115.
[20] 徐梦茹, 周雅楠. 大数据驱动下的电商品牌管理: 创新、挑战与策略[J]. 销售与管理, 2025(23): 6-8.