环境犯罪司法的行政从属性困境中处罚上的完善研究
Research on the Perfection of Punishment in the Dilemma of Administrative Subordination of Environmental Crime Judicature
摘要: 近年来,随着科技的飞速发展与经济社会转型的深入,我国环境犯罪的形态正经历着深刻而复杂的变化,极大地增加了环境犯罪的发现与查处难度。然而,与此形成鲜明对比的是,当前我国对环境犯罪的处罚方式仍显单一,整体处罚力度偏轻,违法成本低、守法成本高的困境无法解决,导致法律威慑力较小,难以有效遏制环境违法犯罪行为。基于此背景,文章结合司法实际数据,研究将紧紧围绕处罚力度与处罚措施这两个方面展开。依据环境犯罪所具有的行政从属性特点,从而提出优化罚金刑适用以及引入恢复性司法理念完善生态修复责任落实与监督。从而真正实现恢复青山绿水的司法终极目标,为建设人与自然和谐共生的现代化提供坚实的法治保障。
Abstract: In recent years, with the rapid development of science and technology and the deepening of economic and social transformation, the form of environmental crime in our country is undergoing profound and complex changes, which greatly increases the difficulty of discovering and investigating environmental crimes. However, in sharp contrast to this, the current punishment of environmental crimes in our country is still single, the overall punishment is too light, and the dilemma of low cost of illegality and high cost of law-abiding can not be solved, as a result, the deterrence of the law is relatively small, and it is difficult to effectively curb environmental crimes. Based on this background, combined with the actual judicial data, this study will focus on the intensity of punishment and punishment measures. According to the characteristics of administrative subordination of environmental crimes, it is proposed to optimize the application of fine punishment and introduce the concept of restorative justice to improve the implementation and supervision of ecological restoration responsibility. So as to truly achieve the ultimate goal of restoring the green hills and clear waters of justice, and provide a solid legal guarantee for the modernization of harmonious coexistence between man and nature.
文章引用:戴宇宏. 环境犯罪司法的行政从属性困境中处罚上的完善研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 147-153. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121075

参考文献

[1] 郑昆山. 环境刑法之基础理论[M]. 1998: 179-180.
[2] 庄乾龙. 环境刑法定性之行政从属性——兼评《两高关于污染环境犯罪解释》 [J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 15(4): 53-60.
[3] 宋伟卫, 冯军. 环境犯罪治理中环境刑法与环境行政法的协调[J]. 广西社会科学, 2017(7): 98-102.
[4] 高强. 污染环境罪定罪量刑实证研究[D]. [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2024.
[5] 云南省生态环境厅. 抓实生态环境损害赔偿与行政处罚衔接实现“执法有温度”助力营商环境优化[EB/OL]. 2024-10-25.
https://sthjt.yn.gov.cn/ywdt/xxywrdjj/202410/t20241025_240323_wap.html, 2025-10-21.
[6] 吴献萍. 罚金刑在环境犯罪中的适用[J]. 法学杂志, 2009, 30(7): 53-55.
[7] 高铭暄, 郭玮. 论环境犯罪附加刑的目的、价值与完善[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2021(1): 93-99.
[8] 吕欣. 环境刑法之立法反思与完善[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012: 155.
[9] 贾学胜. 刑事一体化视阈中的环境犯罪研究[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2022: 222-224.
[10] 帅清华. 我国环境刑事司法实践研究[M]. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2021: 242-243.
[11] 李景豹. 论恢复性司法在环境资源案件中的应用[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.