人工智能算法的可专利性问题研究
Research on the Patentability of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
摘要: 人工智能算法的可专利性判定是数字时代知识产权法的核心挑战。为厘清其专利适格性边界,回应技术问题边界模糊、硬件关联标准不一及领域耦合阈值不明等难题,文章以英国Emotional Perception AI案为切入点,结合国内司法与专利审查实践,构建一个包含“技术问题识别”“硬件结合”及“领域耦合”的三维框架,并尝试为每个维度提供更具体的判断思路。研究结果表明:其一,提出技术问题的多维度判断标准,避免因涉及主观性而直接否定技术性;其二,技术手段应与硬件深度关联(如优化内存或运算效率),体现自然规律的应用;其三,算法需突破应用领域的僵化限制,通过场景融合(如工业识别、医疗诊断)确立技术贡献。最终得出结论,即弱人工智能时代需以动态审查标准平衡创新激励与制度约束,为专利法适应技术变革提供理论支持。
Abstract: The determination of the patentability of artificial intelligence algorithms is a core challenge in intellectual property law in the digital age. To clarify the boundaries of their patent eligibility and address such challenges as the ambiguous boundaries of technical issues, inconsistent standards for hardware association, and unclear thresholds for domain coupling, this paper takes the UK Emotional Perception AI case as the starting point; combining domestic judicial and patent examination practices, it constructs a three-dimensional framework encompassing technical issue identification, hardware integration, and domain coupling. The research findings indicate that: 1. It proposes multi-dimensional criteria for judging technical issues to avoid directly denying their technical nature due to the involvement of subjectivity; 2. Technical means should be deeply associated with hardware (e.g., optimizing memory or computational efficiency) to reflect the application of natural laws; 3. Algorithms need to break through rigid restrictions in application fields and establish technical contributions through scenario integration (e.g., industrial identification, medical diagnosis). Finally, it concludes that in the era of weak artificial intelligence, dynamic examination standards are needed to balance innovation incentives and institutional constraints, providing theoretical support for the adaptation of patent law to technological changes.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
邹开亮, 刘祖兵. 试论人工智能底层算法专利法保护进路[J]. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 45(3): 162-169.
|
|
[2]
|
国家知识产权局. 人工智能相关发明专利申请指引(试行) [EB/OL]. 2024-12-31. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2024/12/31/art_66_196988.html, 2025-04-19.
|
|
[3]
|
陈艳林. 人工智能领域发明专利申请可专利性分析[J]. 中国科技信息, 2024(20): 81-83.
|
|
[4]
|
胡创, 吕斯轩. 人工智能算法专利适格性: 制约因素与实现路径[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(4): 30-39.
|
|
[5]
|
(2023) Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. EWHC 2948 (Ch).
|
|
[6]
|
(2024) Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Limited. EWCA Civ 36 (CA).
|
|
[7]
|
国家知识产权局. [十大案件]“一种建立废钢等级划分神经网络模型方法”发明专利权无效宣告请求案[EB/OL]. 2023-07-25. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2023/7/25/art_2648_186538.html, 2025-04-19.
|
|
[8]
|
狄晓斐. 人工智能算法可专利性探析——从知识生产角度区分抽象概念与具体应用[J]. 知识产权, 2020, 30(6): 81-96.
|
|
[9]
|
刘强. 人工智能算法发明可专利性问题研究[J]. 时代法学, 2019, 17(4): 17-26.
|
|
[10]
|
岳瑞凤, 刘洪池. 人工智能算法成为专利适格客体的理论证成[J]. 中原工学院学报, 2024, 35(4): 18-24.
|
|
[11]
|
姚叶. 多维度解读与选择: 人工智能算法知识产权保护路径探析[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2022(1): 53-61.
|
|
[12]
|
姜野. 算法的规训与规训的算法: 人工智能时代算法的法律规制[J]. 河北法学, 2018, 36(12): 142-153.
|
|
[13]
|
Rudzite-Celmina, L. (2023) Patent-Eligible Invention Requirement under the European Patent Convention and Its Implications on Creations Involving Artificial Intelligence. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 17, 249-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
Djurišić, A.B., Chen, X., Leung, Y.H. and Man Ching Ng, A. (2012) ZnO Nanostructures: Growth, Properties and Applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22, 6526-6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
侯泽琦. 论算法可专利性中的算法解释功能[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(1): 175-183.
|
|
[16]
|
梁乐言. 推荐算法专门立法保护的必要性研究[J]. 法治论坛, 2024(3): 126-142.
|