脊柱内镜治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的技术进展与临床应用
Technical Progress and Clinical Application of Spinal Endoscopy in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.15123546, PDF,   
作者: 孔繁道:赣南医学大学第一临床医学院,江西 赣州;刘午阳*:赣南医学大学第一附属医院骨科,江西 赣州
关键词: 退行性腰椎管狭窄症单侧双通道内镜脊柱内镜微创手术并发症Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Unilateral Dual-Channel Endoscopy Spinal Endoscopy Minimally Invasive Surgery Complications
摘要: 退行性腰椎管狭窄症(Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, DLSS)是一种常见的脊柱退行性疾病,好发于中老年人群。其主要病理改变包括黄韧带肥厚、关节突关节增生及椎间盘突出等,这些因素共同导致椎管有效容积减少,进而压迫马尾神经和神经根,引发神经源性间歇性跛行及相关神经功能障碍。虽然传统开放手术疗效明确,但存在组织创伤大、术后恢复慢、手术效果不佳等问题。近年来,以脊柱内镜技术为代表的微创术式在DLSS治疗中日益重要。本文系统综述了当前广泛应用的几种脊柱内镜术式,包括椎间盘镜(MED)、单轴脊柱内镜(UES)、单侧双通道内镜(UBE)及单孔分体内镜(OSE),并分析其技术特点、适应症与临床疗效。研究显示,脊柱内镜手术在术中失血量、住院时间和术后功能恢复等围手术期指标上优于传统开放手术,且远期疗效相当。文中还探讨了硬脊膜撕裂、神经根损伤、硬膜外血肿及术后感染等常见并发症的预防与处理措施,强调精细解剖操作和实时神经功能监测对保障手术安全的关键作用。未来,脊柱内镜技术有望进一步融合影像导航、人工智能及新型手术器械,向更精准、微创和个体化方向发展,为DLSS患者提供更优治疗方案。
Abstract: Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS) is a common spinal degenerative disease, which is prone to occur in middle-aged and elderly people. The main pathological changes include thickening of the ligamentum flavum, hyperplasia of the facet joints and intervertebral disc protrusion, etc. These factors jointly lead to a reduction in the effective volume of the spinal canal, which in turn compresses the cauda equina nerve and nerve roots, causing neurogenic intermittent claudication and related neurological dysfunction. Although traditional open surgery has definite therapeutic effects, it has problems such as large tissue trauma, slow postoperative recovery and poor surgical outcomes. In recent years, minimally invasive surgical methods represented by spinal endoscopy have become increasingly important in the treatment of DLSS. This article systematically reviews several widely used spinal endoscopic procedures at present, including discoscopy (MED), uniaxial spinal endoscopy (UES), unilateral dual-channel endoscopy (UBE), and single-port split endoscopy (OSE), and analyzes their technical characteristics, indications, and clinical efficacy. Studies have shown that spinal endoscopic surgery is superior to traditional open surgery in perioperative indicators such as intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative functional recovery, and the long-term efficacy is comparable. The article also discusses the prevention and treatment measures of common complications such as dural tear, nerve root injury, epidural hematoma and postoperative infection, emphasizing the key role of precise anatomical operation and real-time neurological function monitoring in ensuring surgical safety. In the future, spinal endoscopy technology is expected to further integrate image navigation, artificial intelligence and new surgical instruments, developing towards greater precision, minimally invasive and individualized directions, providing better treatment options for patients with DLSS.
文章引用:孔繁道, 刘午阳. 脊柱内镜治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的技术进展与临床应用[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(12): 1410-1418. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15123546

参考文献

[1] Katz, J.N., Zimmerman, Z.E., Mass, H. and Makhni, M.C. (2022) Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 327, 1688-1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Wang, L., Wang, T., Fan, N., Yuan, S., Du, P., Si, F., et al. (2023) Efficacy of Repeat Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Reoperation of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Pain Research, 16, 177-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Li, T., Jiang, Q., Zhong, W., Zhu, T., Lu, Z. and Ding, Y. (2024) One-Hole Split Endoscope versus Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Propensity Score Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19, Article No. 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Zhou, H., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Liu, W. and Luo, J. (2023) Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy versus Microscopic Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine, 102, e32756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Aihara, T., Endo, K., Suzuki, H., Kojima, A., Sawaji, Y., Urushibara, M., et al. (2021) Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. World Neurosurgery, 146, e1219-e1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Murata, S., Minamide, A., Takami, M., Iwasaki, H., Okada, S., Nonaka, K., et al. (2021) Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Caused by Facet-Joint Cysts: A Novel Technique with a Cyst-Dyeing Protocol and Cohort Comparison Study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 34, 573-579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Suzuki, A. and Nakamura, H. (2022) Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review. Medicina, 58, Article 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Nomura, K. and Yoshida, M. (2017) Assessment of the Learning Curve for Microendoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis through an Analysis of 480 Cases Involving a Single Surgeon. Global Spine Journal, 7, 54-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wu, B., Xiong, C., Tan, L., Zhao, D., Xu, F. and Kang, H. (2020) Clinical Outcomes of MED and iLESSYS® Delta for the Treatment of Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparison Study. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20, Article No. 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Yoshikane, K., Kikuchi, K. and Okazaki, K. (2021) Clinical Outcomes of Selective Single-Level Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Risk Factors of Reoperation. Global Spine Journal, 13, 1350-1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Pao, J.L. (2021) A Review of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15, S65-S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Choi, D.J. and Kim, J.E. (2019) Efficacy of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 11, 82-88.
[13] Kang, M.S., You, K.H., Choi, J.Y., et al. (2021) Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Biportal Endoscopic Techniques versus Microscopic Tubular Technique. The Spine Journal, 21, 2066-2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Wu, T., Liu, D., Meng, F., Lu, J., Chen, Y. and Fan, Z. (2024) Awake Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression under Local Anesthesia for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the Elderly: A Feasibility Study with Technique Note. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 19, 41-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Heo, D.H., Lee, D.C. and Park, C.K. (2019) Comparative Analysis of Three Types of Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Central Stenosis: Biportal Endoscopy, Uniportal Endoscopy, and Microsurgery. Neurosurgical Focus, 46, E9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Zhang, J., Yan, R., Xu, S., Shao, B. and Dou, Y. (2024) Short-Term Lumbar Disc and Lumbar Stability Changes of One-Hole Split Endoscope Technique Treatment of Spinal Stenosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25, Article No. 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zhang, F., Ye, D., Zhang, W., Sun, Y., Guo, L. and Li, J. (2024) Efficacy of Lumbar Decompression under Large-Channel Spinal Endoscope in Elderly Patients with Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kang, T., Park, S.Y., Kang, C.H., et al. (2019) Is Biportal Technique/Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Satisfactory for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Medicine (Baltimore), 98, e15451.
[19] Kim, J.E. and Choi, D.J. (2018) Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression by 30° Endoscopy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technical Note and Preliminary Report. Journal of Orthopaedics, 15, 366-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Liang, J., Lian, L., Liang, S., Zhao, H., Shu, G., Chao, J., et al. (2022) Efficacy and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. World Neurosurgery, 159, e91-e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Wang, B., He, P., Liu, X., Wu, Z. and Xu, B. (2023) Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Single-Arm Studies. Orthopaedic Surgery, 15, 3-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Tsutsumimoto, T., Yui, M., Uehara, M., Ohta, H., Kosaku, H. and Misawa, H. (2014) A Prospective Study of the Incidence and Outcomes of Incidental Dural Tears in Microendoscopic Lumbar Decompressive Surgery. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96, 641-645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Minamide, A., Yoshida, M., Yamada, H., Nakagawa, Y., Kawai, M., Maio, K., et al. (2013) Endoscope-Assisted Spinal Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 19, 664-671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lee, H.G., Kang, M.S., Kim, S.Y., Cho, K.C., Na, Y.C., Cho, J.M., et al. (2020) Dural Injury in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery. Global Spine Journal, 11, 845-851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Soma, K., Kato, S., Oka, H., Matsudaira, K., Fukushima, M., Oshina, M., et al. (2019) Influence of Incidental Dural Tears and Their Primary Microendoscopic Repairs on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Microendoscopic Lumbar Surgery. The Spine Journal, 19, 1559-1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Zhou, C., Zhang, G., Panchal, R.R., et al. (2018) Unique Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy. Pain Physician, 21, E105-E112.
[27] Hsu, Y.C., Liu, Y.F., Chang, C.J., et al. (2024) How to Prevent Nerve Root Injury in Uniportal Full Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Surgery? Insights from a Cadaveric Anatomic Study with Simulation Surgery. Spine, 49, 1301-1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Kim, H.S., Wu, P.H. and Jang, I.T. (2020) Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Outside-In Approach: A Proctorship Guideline with 12 Steps of Effectiveness and Safety. Neurospine, 17, S99-S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Bai, T.Y., Meng, H., Lin, J.S., et al. (2025) Application of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20, Article No. 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Kim, J.E., Choi, D.J. and Park, E.J. (2019) Evaluation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. World Neurosurgery, 126, e786-e792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ahn, J.S., Lee, H.J., Park, E.J., et al. (2019) Multifidus Muscle Changes after Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation. World Neurosurgery, 130, e525-e534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Merter, A. and Shibayama, M. (2019) Does the Drain Placement Technique Affect the Amount of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Microendoscopic Decompressive Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 27, Article 2309499019869023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Ikuta, K., Tono, O., Tanaka, T., Arima, J., Nakano, S., Sasaki, K., et al. (2006) Evaluation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Microendoscopic Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 5, 404-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Boadi, B.I., Ikwuegbuenyi, C.A., Inzerillo, S., Dykhouse, G., Bratescu, R., Omer, M., et al. (2024) Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review. Neurospine, 21, 770-803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Fourney, D.R., Dettori, J.R., Norvell, D.C. and Dekutoski, M.B. (2010) Does Minimal Access Tubular Assisted Spine Surgery Increase or Decrease Complications in Spinal Decompression or Fusion? Spine, 35, S57-S65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Yoshimoto, M., Iesato, N., Terashima, Y., Tanimoto, K., Oshigiri, T., Emori, M., et al. (2019) Mid-Term Clinical Results of Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis. Spine Surgery and Related Research, 3, 229-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Rebelo, P., Sousa, C.P. and Campos, M.T. (2024) The Value of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Patient Positioning in Spine Surgery: A Preventive Strategy. Cureus, 16, e73662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Rahman, M., Summers, L., Richter, B., Mimran, R. and Jacob, R. (2008) Comparison of Techniques for Decompressive Lumbar Laminectomy: The Minimally Invasive versus the “Classic” Open Approach. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 51, 100-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Murata, S., Minamide, A., Iwasaki, H., Nakagawa, Y., Hashizume, H., Yukawa, Y., et al. (2020) Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbosacral Foraminal Stenosis: A Novel Surgical Strategy Based on Anatomical Considerations Using 3D Image Fusion with MRI/CT. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 33, 789-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]