长骨恶性肿瘤切除后重建方式的研究进展
Research Progress on Reconstruction Methods after Resection of Malignant Tumors of Long Bones
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.15123572, PDF,   
作者: 陈致远:西安医学院研究生工作部,陕西 西安;艾希林, 张茂林, 余冬梅*:空军军医大学第二附属医院骨科,陕西 西安
关键词: 骨肿瘤骨缺损重建3D打印假体同种异体骨自体腓骨Bone Tumor Bone Defect Reconstruction 3D Printed Prosthesis Allograft Fibula
摘要: 在新辅助化疗、放疗及影像学技术不断进步的背景下,四肢长骨恶性肿瘤保肢治疗已取得显著成效,在病人条件许可的情况下,保肢手术与截肢手术的5年生存率无区别。长骨恶性肿瘤切除后残留的大段骨缺损(长度 > 5 cm)难以自行修复,需要进行人工重建,当前重建方法可大致分为生物重建与机械重建两大类。3D打印假体作为机械重建方式之一,可实现高精度适配与瞬时稳定,具备骨长入能力的多孔设计,同步实现生物学整合与力学支撑,但临床实践案例相对匮乏。生物医用材料,融合新型生物材料的创新修复技术,针对骨缺损的治疗展现出突出的临床潜力。Masquelet与Ilizarov技术展现出突出的临床潜力。该文概括了现阶段长骨肿瘤切除后重建方法的研究现状,汇总了3D打印假体与新材料的应用,剖析了各项技术的强项与短板,同时展望了研究方向。长骨恶性肿瘤切除后大段骨缺损重建方式多种多样,每种方式都有其优缺点,重建方式的选择主要依赖医师的经验,本文就分析各种重建方式,以期为临床提供参考。
Abstract: Amid ongoing advancements in neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and imaging techniques, limb salvage treatment for malignant tumors of the long bones has yielded significant outcomes. When patient conditions allow, the 5-year survival rates for limb salvage surgery and amputation surgery are comparable. Large bone defects (length > 5 cm) that persist following the resection of malignant long bone tumors are challenging to repair autonomously and necessitate artificial reconstruction. Presently, reconstruction methods can be broadly categorized into two primary types: biological reconstruction and mechanical reconstruction. 3D printed prostheses represent a notable mechanical reconstruction method that offers high-precision adaptation and immediate stability. These prostheses feature a porous design conducive to bone growth and facilitate both biological integration and mechanical support. Despite their advantages, clinical applications remain limited. Innovative repair technologies that incorporate new biomaterials have shown significant clinical promise in addressing bone defects. The Masquelet and Ilizarov techniques also exhibit considerable potential in clinical settings. This article reviews the current state of research on post-resection reconstruction methods for long bone tumors, compiles the applications of 3D printed prostheses and novel materials, and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of each technology while anticipating future research directions. Various methods exist for reconstructing large bone defects following the resection of malignant long bone tumors, each presenting distinct advantages and disadvantages. The selection of a reconstruction method primarily relies on the physician’s experience. This article aims to analyze these reconstruction methods to serve as a reference for clinical practice.
文章引用:陈致远, 艾希林, 张茂林, 余冬梅. 长骨恶性肿瘤切除后重建方式的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(12): 1617-1623. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.15123572

参考文献

[1] Brown, K.L.B. (1991) Limb Reconstruction with Vascularized Fibular Grafts after Bone Tumor Resection. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 262, 64-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 朱皓东. 生物复合重建用于肢体肿瘤性大段骨缺损的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 中国人民解放军空军军医大学, 2020.
[3] 张聘, 樊根涛, 周幸, 等. 自体腓骨移植重建骨肿瘤患者的骨缺损[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2019, 8(9): 651-655.
[4] Feltri, P., Solaro, L., Errani, C., Schiavon, G., Candrian, C. and Filardo, G. (2021) Vascularized Fibular Grafts for the Treatment of Long Bone Defects: Pros and Cons. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 143, 29-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 张翼, 张岩, 李甲振, 等. 同种异体骨移植重建四肢恶性骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 225-229.
[6] 郑小飞, 黄华扬, 丁焕文, 等. 大块同种异体骨移植重建骨肿瘤巨大骨缺损78例[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2009, 13(15): 2978-2983.
[7] Liu, Q., Long, F., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., He, H. and Luo, W. (2023) Biological Reconstruction of Bone Defect after Resection of Malignant Bone Tumor by Allograft: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21, Article No. 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Othman, S., Bricker, J.T., Azoury, S.C., Elfanagely, O., Weber, K.L. and Kovach, S.J. (2020) Allograft Alone Vs. Allograft with Intramedullary Vascularized Fibular Graft for Lower Extremity Bone Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73, 1221-1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 陈飚, 杨松巍, 单东力, 等. 组配型假体置换治疗肢体骨肿瘤[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(5): 566-569.
[10] Streitbürger, A., Hardes, J., Nottrott, M. and Guder, W.K. (2020) Reconstruction Survival of Segmental Megaendoprostheses: A Retrospective Analysis of 28 Patients Treated for Intercalary Bone Defects after Musculoskeletal Tumor Resections. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 142, 41-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 戚金凤, 张成. 骨肿瘤切除术后骨缺损重建研究进展[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2022, 28(7): 628-632.
[12] Frosch, K., Barvencik, F., Lohmann, C.H., Viereck, V., Siggelkow, H., Breme, J., et al. (2002) Migration, Matrix Production and Lamellar Bone Formation of Human Osteoblast-Like Cells in Porous Titanium Implants. Cells Tissues Organs, 170, 214-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Wang, H., Su, K., Su, L., Liang, P., Ji, P. and Wang, C. (2019) Comparison of 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum and Titanium Scaffolds on Osteointegration and Osteogenesis. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 104, Article ID: 109908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 谭海涛, 陈国平, 张其标. 3D打印技术在骨肿瘤手术应用中的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2020, 12(3): 356-360.
[15] Luenam, S., Kosiyatrakul, A., Phakdeewisetkul, K. and Puncreobutr, C. (2020) The Patient-Specific Implant Created with 3D Printing Technology in Treatment of a Severe Open Distal Humerus Fracture with Complete Loss of the Lateral Column. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Vitiello, R., Matrangolo, M.R., El Motassime, A., Perna, A., Cianni, L., Maccauro, G., et al. (2022) Three-dimension-printed Custom-Made Prosthetic Reconstructions in Bone Tumors: A Single Center Experience. Current Oncology, 29, 4566-4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 牛晓辉, 金韬, 徐海荣. 3D打印技术在肢体骨肿瘤切除重建中的应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(7): 790-795.
[18] 郭卫, 佘艳春, 梁海杰. 3D打印金属假体重建四肢骨肿瘤切除后大段骨关节缺损:大段骨缺损修复重建的新纪元[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2022, 15(12): 881-888.
[19] Liu, W., Shao, Z., Rai, S., Hu, B., Wu, Q., Hu, H., et al. (2020) Three-Dimensional-Printed Intercalary Prosthesis for the Reconstruction of Large Bone Defect after Joint‐Preserving Tumor Resection. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 121, 570-577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Li, H., Zheng, Y. and Qin, L. (2014) Progress of Biodegradable Metals. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 24, 414-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Kandasamy, J., Arulvel, S., Jeyapandiarajan, P., Murugan, M. and Prayer Riju, R. (2025) Recent Trends and Future Prospects in Metallic Implants for Biomedical Applications. In: Khan M., A., Singh, G. and Sulaiman, S., Eds., Challenges and Innovations in 3D Printed Bio-Organs and Their Materials, Springer, 223-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Liu, C., Ren, Z., Xu, Y., Pang, S., Zhao, X. and Zhao, Y. (2018) Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys Developed as Bone Repair Materials: A Review. Scanning, 2018, Article ID: 9216314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Li, D., Zhang, D., Yuan, Q., Liu, L., Li, H., Xiong, L., et al. (2022) In Vitro and in Vivo Assessment of the Effect of Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys on Osteogenesis. Acta Biomaterialia, 141, 454-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Estrin, Y., Martynenko, N., Anisimova, N., Temralieva, D., Kiselevskiy, M., Serebryany, V., et al. (2019) The Effect of Equal-Channel Angular Pressing on the Microstructure, the Mechanical and Corrosion Properties and the Anti-Tumor Activity of Magnesium Alloyed with Silver. Materials, 12, Article 3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kiselevsky, M.V., Anisimova, N.Y., Polotsky, B.E., Martynenko, N.S., Lukyanova, E.A., Sitdikova, S.M., et al. (2019) Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys as Promising Materials for Medical Applications (Review). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine, 11, 146-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Macni, C., Kaissar, F., Hardwigsen, J., Jaloux, C., Mayoly, A., Witters, M., et al. (2024) Two-Stage Surgery for Large Sacrococcygeal Chordomas: How I Do It. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique, 69, 434-441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Tahermanesh, K., Hadavi, S.M.M., Talaei-Khozani, T., Razmkhah, M., Abed, S.M., et al. (2016) Cytotoxicity Assessment of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Synthesized Biodegradable Mg-Zn-Ca Alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 69, 584-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Hakimi, O., Ventura, Y., Goldman, J., Vago, R. and Aghion, E. (2016) Porous Biodegradable EW62 Medical Implants Resist Tumor Cell Growth. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 61, 516-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Wei, S., Ma, J., Xu, L., Gu, X. and Ma, X. (2020) Biodegradable Materials for Bone Defect Repair. Military Medical Research, 7, Article No. 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Yan, Y., Chu, X., Luo, X., Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Dai, Y., et al. (2021) A Homogenous Microstructural Mg-Based Matrix Model for Orthopedic Application with Generating Uniform and Smooth Corrosion Product Layer in Ringer’s Solution: Study on Biodegradable Behavior of Mg-Zn Alloys Prepared by Powder Metallurgy as a Case. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 9, 225-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Niikura, T., Oda, T., Jimbo, N., Komatsu, M., Oe, K., Fukui, T., et al. (2022) Immunohistochemical Analysis Revealed the Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins-4, 6, 7, and 9 in Human Induced Membrane Samples Treated with the Masquelet Technique. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17, Article No. 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Guimarães, J.A.M., Scorza, B.J.B., Machado, J.A.P., Cavalcanti, A.D.S. and Duarte, M.E.L. (2023) Caracterização da membrana induzida pela técnica de Masquelet em modelo murino de defeito ósseo segmentar. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 58, e798-e807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] 范金柱, 从飞, 任小宇, 等. 膜诱导技术治疗合并骨缺损的股骨远端Gustilo-Anderson ⅢB型损伤[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(5): 609-613.
[34] 马炬雷, 王兵, 陈博, 等. Masquelet技术研究及临床应用进展[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2025, 40(1): 46-52.
[35] McBride‐Gagyi, S., Toth, Z., Kim, D., Ip, V., Evans, E., Watson, J.T., et al. (2018) Altering Spacer Material Affects Bone Regeneration in the Masquelet Technique in a Rat Femoral Defect. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 36, 2228-2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Verboket, R.D., Leiblein, M., Janko, M., Schaible, A., Brune, J.C., Schröder, K., et al. (2020) From Two Stages to One: Acceleration of the Induced Membrane (Masquelet) Technique Using Human Acellular Dermis for the Treatment of Non-Infectious Large Bone Defects. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 46, 317-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] 杨华清, 曲龙. Ilizarov骨搬移技术[J]. 中国骨伤, 2022, 35(10): 903-907.
[38] 叶琪毅, 张文广, 唐亚飞, 等. 两种应用Ilizarov技术治疗胫骨大段骨合并软组织缺损的疗效分析[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2021, 35(2): 194-197.