小农户食品安全行政处罚执法优化研究
Research on the Optimization of Administrative Penalty Enforcement for Food Safety of Small-Scale Farmers
摘要: 本文围绕小农户在食品安全行政处罚中所面临的“过罚不当”问题展开研究,旨在探索执法优化的路径。通过对《食品安全法》《农产品质量安全法》等现行法律体系的梳理,指出当前行政处罚起点高、裁量基准不明确、缺乏差异化机制等问题,导致小农户因轻微违法而承担与其承受能力严重不符的高额罚款,进而引发执法困境与社会公平争议。同时,通过研究借鉴欧盟、美国、加拿大等地区的监管经验,提出统一裁量基准、建立分级处罚机制、推行“以教代罚”柔性执法、加强政府全过程介入等具体优化建议,以平衡食品安全监管目标与小农户权益保护,推动行政执法更具合理性、可操作性与人文关怀,为实现食品安全治理现代化提供理论参考与实践路径。
Abstract: This study examines the issue of disproportionate penalties in food safety administrative enforcement against small-scale farmers, aiming to explore pathways for optimizing enforcement practices. Through an analysis of China’s current legal framework, including the Food Safety Law and the Agricultural Product Quality Safety Law, the research identifies systemic problems such as high minimum penalty thresholds, vague discretionary standards, and the lack of a differentiated enforcement mechanism. These shortcomings often result in excessive fines for minor violations that far exceed the economic capacity of smallholders, leading to enforcement dilemmas and challenges regarding social equity. Furthermore, by drawing on regulatory experiences from the European Union, the United States and Canada, this research proposes concrete optimization strategies. These include unifying discretionary benchmarks, establishing a tiered penalty system, promoting educational alternatives to penalties, and enhancing government involvement throughout the agricultural production and sales process. The recommendations seek to balance the objectives of food safety regulation with the protection of smallholders’ rights, thereby facilitating more rational, operable, and humane administrative enforcement. This research provides theoretical and practical insights for advancing the modernization of food safety governance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王贵松. 卖5斤芹菜罚款6.6万元: 执法问题还是立法问题? [EB/OL]. 2022-09-12. https://www.163.com/dy/article/HH2AT1DQ0530W1MT.html, 2025-02-12.
|
|
[2]
|
李雯雯. 食用农产品市场监管执法自由裁量权行使问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2024.
|
|
[3]
|
“福州芹菜案”: 司法能及时纠错, 又何劳督导组出手[EB/OL]. 2023-06-15. http://views.ce.cn/view/ent/202306/15/t20230615_38591984.shtml, 2025-05-12.
|
|
[4]
|
王学辉, 张治宇. 迈向可接受性的中国行政法[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2014(3): 97-106.
|
|
[5]
|
陶丽琴, 沈雅岚, 张丽帆. 食用农产品销售违法处罚法律适用难点的剖析及建议——以一起市场摊贩黄鳝兽药残留超标行政处罚案为例[J]. 标准科学, 2022(5): 59-63.
|
|
[6]
|
陕西榆林夫妇卖5斤芹菜遭罚6.6万, 国务院督查组: 处罚过当[EB/OL]. 2022-08-07. https://www.guancha.cn/politics/2022_08_27_655489.shtml, 2025-05-12.
|
|
[7]
|
汤雷, 许峰. 浅谈食品行政处罚案件如何依法“减轻处罚” [J]. 食品安全导刊, 2020(20): 52-53.
|
|
[8]
|
毕金峰, 魏益民, 潘家荣. 欧盟食品安全法规体系及其借鉴[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2005(3): 11-14.
|
|
[9]
|
余凌云. 行政自由裁量论[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2005: 327.
|
|
[10]
|
李霖, 唐勇. 农产品行政处罚中裁量的适用[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2024, 15(2): 65-70.
|
|
[11]
|
芹菜罚款案引关注行政处罚如何做到过罚相当[EB/OL]. 2022-09-01. https://news.cctv.com/2022/09/01/ARTI1ztmpqwwm68tdniqTxpK220901.shtml, 2025-05-12.
|