基于稳态热流计法的低导热材料检测装备的研发、技术优化与稳定性验证
R&D, Technical Optimization and Stability Verification of Testing Equipment for Low Thermal Conductivity Materials Based on Steady-State Heat Flow Meter Method
DOI: 10.12677/ms.2025.1512227, PDF,   
作者: 江正林:福建赛特新材股份有限公司,福建 龙岩;韩子豪, 杨 亮*:厦门理工学院材料科学与工程学院,福建 厦门;韩锋钢*:厦门理工学院机械与汽车工程学院,福建 厦门
关键词: 稳态热流计法设备研发低导热材料VIP板检测精度Steady-State Heat Flow Meter Method Equipment R&D Low Thermal Conductivity Materials VIP Panels Detection Accuracy
摘要: 针对真空绝热板(VIP)等低导热材料(1~50 mW/(m·K))检测中测厚误差大、材料特性干扰显著及进口设备成本高的问题,本文研发了ST-500型稳态热流计法检测装备。通过优化测厚系统(解决上下板水平偏差、升降机冲击等4项关键问题),测厚标准差降至≤0.017 mm;结合高灵敏度热流计(EKOHF-30S)与Pt100热电阻,实现控温精度±0.05℃、检测准确度±2%。通过3种规格VIP板(硬质349 × 504 × 13.80 mm、中软质300 × 300 × 12.25 mm、软质290 × 400 × 7.25 mm)进行验证:硬质板两种装载方式导热系数误差 ≤ 0.1 mW/(m·K),软质板“不取出”时厚度衰减0.13 mm (需优先“取出”装载)。与进口耐驰HFM446对比,ST-500重复性更优(测厚标准差0.01 mm vs 0.013 mm),成本仅为进口设备的1/2,满足GB/T 10295-2008标准,推动了低导热材料检测设备的国产化替代。
Abstract: Aiming at the problems of large thickness measurement error, significant interference from material properties, and high cost of imported equipment in the testing of low thermal conductivity materials (1~50 mW/(m·K)) such as vacuum insulation panels (VIPs), the ST-500 testing equipment based on the steady-state heat flow meter method was developed in this paper. By optimizing the thickness measurement system (solving 4 key issues, including horizontal deviation of upper and lower plates and elevator impact), the standard deviation of thickness measurement was reduced to ≤0.017 mm. Combined with a high-sensitivity heat flux meter (EKOHF-30S) and a Pt100 thermistor, the equipment achieved a temperature control accuracy of ±0.05˚C and a detection accuracy of ±2%. Verification was conducted with 3 types of VIP panels (hard: 349 × 504 × 13.80 mm, medium-soft: 300 × 300 × 12.25 mm, soft: 290 × 400 × 7.25 mm). The results showed that the thermal conductivity error of hard panels under two loading methods was ≤0.1 mW/(m·K), while the thickness of soft panels attenuated by 0.13 mm when using the “non-removal” loading method (the “removal” loading method should be prioritized). Compared with the imported Netzsch HFM446, the ST-500 had better repeatability (thickness measurement standard deviation: 0.01 mm vs 0.013 mm) and its cost was only 1/2 of that of imported equipment. It meets the GB/T 10295-2008 standard and can promote the localization replacement of testing equipment for low thermal conductivity materials.
文章引用:江正林, 韩子豪, 杨亮, 韩锋钢. 基于稳态热流计法的低导热材料检测装备的研发、技术优化与稳定性验证[J]. 材料科学, 2025, 15(12): 2139-2146. https://doi.org/10.12677/ms.2025.1512227

参考文献

[1] 司荣, 金栋, 刘峰, 等. 有机传热介质高温导热系数的测定及准确性评价[J]. 中国特种设备安全, 2025, 41(4): 18-22.
[2] 车玲玉, 邢家新, 车凯. 防护热板法测定绝热用挤塑聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料板导热系数的不确定度评定[J]. 实验室检测, 2025, 3(12): 188-190.
[3] 陈元招, 江正林, 魏建彪. 稳态热流计法导热系数检测仪研究与设计[J]. 新技术新工艺, 2025(4): 24-30.
[4] 廖兴旺, 李金莹, 段吉莲, 等. 导热系数测定仪(热流计法)示值误差的不确定度评定[J]. 品牌与标准化, 2024(5): 254-256.
[5] 国家市场监督管理总局. JJF 2220-2025导热系数稳态测定仪校准规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2025-03-27.
[6] 古宏渊, 许俊峰. 新型矿棉材料导热系数检测仪及方法[P]. 中国专利, 202410599105. 2024-08-23.
[7] 朱坤浩, 石岩. Hot Disk热常数分析仪测定深层岩土导热系数试验研究[J]. 吉林建筑大学学报, 2025, 42(2): 76-81.
[8] 陈海中. 建筑节能材料导热系数检测问题及对策分析[J]. 中国科技期刊数据库 工业A, 2025(1): 120-123.
[9] 沈亚琴, 景泊桥. 瞬态平面热源法检测自保温砌块导热系数的影响因素研究[J]. 工程技术研究, 2024, 9(2): 25-27.
[10] 张昱. 一种导热系数测定仪[P]. 中国专利, 202421109642. 2025-04-04.
[11] Chen, B.X., Ma, S.J., Zhu, Y.C., et al. (2025) A Micro Thermal Conductivity Detector with Diffusion Channels Suppressing the Effect of Forced Convection. Microchemical Journal, 208, Article ID: 112521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 周妍珺. 基于钻芯检测的建筑节能材料导热系数精准测定与分析[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)工程技术, 2025(3): 17-20.
[13] 王晓梁, 张娄红, 何华, 等. 石墨块导热系数测试仪[P]. 中国专利, 202410332196. 2024-06-18.
[14] Cho, W., Yoo, J., Kwak, J. and Shin, H. (2025) Suspended 1D Nanoheaters for Ultralow-Power Thermal Conductivity Detector-Type Gas Sensors Fabricated via a Simple Four-Step Wafer-Scale Process. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 443, Article ID: 138283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 宋婧. 建筑保温隔热材料导热系数检测结果影响因素分析[J]. 广东建材, 2025, 41(1): 29-32.
[16] 李爱民, 刘根保, 方淋淋, 等. 一种石墨复合保温板导热系数测量装置[P]. 中国专利, 202411530243. 2025-03-07.
[17] Xia, C., Yu, T., Liu, J., Li, X., Wang, J., Ma, S., et al. (2024) Effective Self‐Powered Semimetal TaTe2 Photodetector with the Thermal Localization Photothermoelectric Effect from Ultraviolet to Mid‐Infrared Range. Advanced Optical Materials, 12, Article ID: 2400314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 杨万清. 建筑节能材料导热系数检测技术对比与应用分析[J]. 实验室检测, 2025, 3(7): 13-15.
[19] 潘永杲, 周逸, 闵琪涛, 等. 稳态法导热系数测定仪校准方法及其不确定度评定[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2022, 49(9): 107-110.
[20] 伍浩欣. 建筑保温材料导热系数检测及对围护结构保温性能的影响[J]. 福建建材, 2023(4): 30-32.
[21] 杨勇, 赵亚杰, 黄鹏, 等. 厚度、温度与温差对导热系数检测影响的试验研究[J]. 节能, 2022, 41(7): 52-54.
[22] 王孟阳, 姜国伟, 蒲晓明, 等. 智能化导热系数测定仪的开发应用[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2020(12): 37-39.
[23] 龚洪秀. 防护热板法检测绝热材料导热系数的影响因素及误差分析[J]. 散装水泥, 2021(5): 120-122+125.
[24] 毛赏, 阚安康, 白悦, 等. 内部真空度对真空绝热板导热系数的影响[J]. 低温与超导, 2019, 47(3): 55-60+94.
[25] 邓伟东. 平板导热系数仪的标定[J]. 居舍, 2019(11): 167.
[26] 杨杰. 基于单片机的导热系数测试仪的系统设计浅谈[J]. 中国设备工程, 2019(6): 75-76.