营销策略协同下的闭环供应链定价决策研究——消费者预期与回收模式的作用
Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Pricing Decisions under Coordinated Marketing Strategies—The Role of Consumer Expectations and Recycling Models
摘要: 定价是营销中的关键问题,本文在集中决策、制造商回收及零售商回收三种情境下分别建立考虑消费者预期的定价决策模型。通过运用Stackelberg博弈与逆向归纳法,研究解析各模型的最优均衡解,还有数值仿真展现消费者预期敏感系数与回收价格弹性对回收率与供应链利润的影响效果。研究得出结论:消费者价格预期敏感系数对销售价格呈现负向影响,而回收价格预期敏感系数则对回收价格产生正向驱动;在分散决策模式下,零售商回收模型的系统效率优于制造商回收模型;集中决策模型可作为评估与优化两种分散决策模式的基准。本文结论强化了定价决策在营销组合中的核心地位,为闭环供应链中成员的营销策略提供了切实的理论与实践启示。
Abstract: Pricing is a key issue in marketing. This paper establishes pricing decision models that consider consumer expectations under three scenarios: centralized decision-making, manufacturer take-back, and retailer take-back. By applying the Stackelberg game and backward induction method, the study analyzes the optimal equilibrium solutions of each model. Numerical simulations further illustrate the impact of consumers’ price expectation sensitivity and recycling price elasticity on recycling rates and supply chain profits. The study concludes that consumers’ sensitivity to price expectations negatively influences sales prices, whereas sensitivity to recycling price expectations positively drives recycling prices. Under decentralized decision-making, the system efficiency of the retailer take-back model is superior to that of the manufacturer take-back model; the centralized decision-making model can serve as a benchmark for evaluating and optimizing the two decentralized decision-making models. The findings of this paper reinforce the central role of pricing decisions in the marketing mix and provide practical theoretical insights for the marketing strategies of members in a closed-loop supply chain.
文章引用:邵钦畹. 营销策略协同下的闭环供应链定价决策研究——消费者预期与回收模式的作用[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 2022-2035. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124081

参考文献

[1] 赵静, 肖亚倩. 不同渠道偏好和运营成本下双渠道闭环供应链定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 108-114.
[2] 董景峰, 高珊, 高贵晨, 等. 顾客感知价值和回收质量不确定下的闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(8): 2476-2490.
[3] 刘春怡, 尤天慧, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员企业风险态度的制造商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(5): 1239-1248.
[4] Baldi, B., Confente, I., Russo, I. and Gaudenzi, B. (2024) Consumer‐Centric Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review, Framework, and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Logistics, 45, e12399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 杨军, 高建广, 辛宝贵. 消费者偏好驱动逆向供应链双渠道回收策略研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(3): 60-66+88.
[6] 李庆华. 考虑成员行为的双渠道供应链最优策略研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2015.
[7] 黄荣基. 考虑社会网络效应和消费者有限理性行为的定价研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2019.
[8] Wang, Q., Li, S. and Liu, J. (2025) Elastic Revenue-Sharing Contracts for Closed-Loop Supply Chains under Disruptions. Transportation Research Part E, 192, Article 103215.
[9] Zhao, W. and Liu, N. (2024) Cost-Sharing Contracts for Remanufacturing in Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, Article 136892.
[10] 田梦瑶. 参考价格效应下的产品定价策略研究[J]. 现代商业, 2025(2): 24-27.
[11] Baldwin, C. (2024) Power Balance Theory in Supply Chain Management. Springer.
[12] 林贵华, 冯文秀, 杨振平. 回收商参与的多阶段绿色闭环供应链竞争模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 136-148.
[13] Zhou, Y., Xiong, Y. and Jin, M. (2021) Less Is More: Consumer Education in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing. Omega, 101, Article 102259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Li, X.R. and Li, C.H. (2025) Differences Research of Closed-Loop Supply Chain’s Channels under Dual Consumer Preferences.
[15] Zhao, S., Han, Y., Zhou, Q. and Xia, X. (2025) Collaborative Management of Battery Manufacturer Responsibility in Electric Vehicle Production with ESG Due Diligence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 486, Article ID: 144591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef