电商经济下“大数据杀熟”的治理困境与路径探索
Governance Dilemmas and Pathways of “Big Data Price Discrimination” in the E-Commerce Economy
摘要: 随着数字经济的快速发展,电商平台在大数据与算法技术的推动下,实现了精准营销和个性化服务。然而,“大数据杀熟”现象的出现,使消费者在同一交易条件下因身份、历史行为等因素而被差别定价,损害了公平交易原则与消费者信任。本文以电商平台为研究对象,系统分析了“大数据杀熟”的概念内涵、形成机制及社会影响,揭示其背后法律规制滞后、算法透明度不足、市场竞争失衡、消费者维权困难与数据伦理风险等多重治理困境。在此基础上,本文结合现行法律与治理实践,提出了“大数据杀熟”的多维治理路径:一是完善法律体系与强化算法监管机制;二是推动算法透明与技术伦理建设;三是强化平台责任与行业自律;四是提升公众数据素养,构建社会共治格局。研究认为,治理“大数据杀熟”应以法治为基础、以技术为支撑、以伦理为引领,形成政府监管、企业自律与公众参与的协同机制,从而在促进数字经济创新的同时守住公平与信任的底线。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital economy, e-commerce platforms have achieved precise marketing and personalized services driven by big data and algorithmic technologies. However, the phenomenon of “big data price discrimination”, commonly known as “data-enabled exploitation of loyal customers”, has raised significant concerns regarding fairness and consumer trust. This study focuses on e-commerce platforms and systematically analyzes the connotation, formation mechanism, and social impact of big data price discrimination. It reveals the multiple governance dilemmas behind it, including the lag of legal regulation, insufficient algorithm transparency, market imbalance, consumer rights protection difficulties, and data ethics risks. On this basis, the paper proposes a multi-dimensional governance framework for big data price discrimination: 1) Improving the legal system and strengthening algorithmic supervision; 2) Enhancing algorithm transparency and embedding ethical design into technology governance; 3) Reinforcing platform responsibility and industry self-discipline; 4) Improving public data literacy to promote social co-governance. The study concludes that addressing “big data price discrimination” requires a coordinated approach integrating legal regulation, technological innovation, and ethical oversight, so as to safeguard fairness and trust while encouraging sustainable innovation in the digital economy.
文章引用:盛昱南. 电商经济下“大数据杀熟”的治理困境与路径探索[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 2195-2201. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124102

参考文献

[1] 孟勤国. 治理算法歧视侵害消费者权益的关键问题——以大数据杀熟为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2023(3): 37-47.
[2] 赵洁. 网络购物消费者知情权保护存在的问题及立法完善建议[J]. 法制博览, 2024(9): 121-123.
[3] 朱坤帝. “算法”变“算计”?——大数据时代算法杀熟的法律规制[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 27(S1): 27-30.
[4] 王迪羽珊. 大数据“杀熟”中消费者权益保护问题研究[J]. 中国品牌与防伪, 2025(8): 71-73.
[5] 田永杰, 李铜山. 政府治理、消费者忠诚与电商平台“大数据杀熟”: 三方演化博弈分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2025, 55(7): 255-272.
[6] 陈慧. 经济法视角下应对大数据杀熟现象的对策分析[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2025, 24(13): 26-28.
[7] 黄毅, 宋子寅. 大数据背景下“算法杀熟”的法律规制[J]. 中州学刊, 2022(4): 50-54.
[8] 陈兵. 规制“大数据杀熟”: 算法向上向善的治理进路[J]. 人民论坛, 2025(17): 56-60.
[9] 王秋梅. “大数据杀熟”的演变轨迹、治理困境与协同共治[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(3): 72-79, 108.