人工智能创作物的著作权归属认定研究
Research on the Identification of Copyright Ownership of Artificial Intelligence Creative Works
摘要: 生成式人工智能的出现无疑改变了传统作品的创作模式,引发了诸多的著作权问题。人工智能虽然具备“类人化”的特征,但无论从法理依据还是哲学视角,人工智能机器本身都不应被视为权利主体,而仅应作为一种创作工具。至于人工智能创作物是否构成著作权法意义上的作品,应坚持以“独创性”为判断标准;而在人工智能创作物的著作权归属确定上,在充分衡量各方利益基础之上,应逐步建立起以创作者(编程设计者、使用者、所有者)为主,投资者为辅的著作权归属模式。
Abstract: The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has undoubtedly changed the traditional mode of creative works, giving rise to numerous copyright issues. Although artificial intelligence exhibits “human-like” characteristics, from both a legal and philosophical perspective, artificial intelligence machines themselves should not be regarded as rights holders, but merely as a creative tool. As for whether artificial intelligence creations constitute works in the sense of copyright law, the criterion of “originality” should be adhered to; and in determining the ownership of copyright for artificial intelligence creations, a copyright ownership model should be gradually established based on the interests of all parties, with creators (programmers, users, owners) as the primary stakeholders and investors as the secondary ones.
文章引用:倪千惠. 人工智能创作物的著作权归属认定研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 240-245. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121086

参考文献

[1] 吴汉东. 论人工智能生成内容的可版权性: 实务、法理与制度[J]. 中国法律评论, 2024(3): 113-129.
[2] 司晓. 奇点来临: ChatGPT时代的著作权法走向何处——兼回应相关论点[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2023(5): 79-86+178-179.
[3] 张春艳, 任霄. 人工智能创作物的可版权性及权利归属[J]. 时代法学, 2018, 16(4): 22-28.
[4] 熊琦. 人工智能生成内容的著作权认定[J]. 知识产权, 2017(3): 3-8.
[5] 冯洁. 人工智能体法律主体地位的法理反思[J]. 东方法学, 2019(4): 43-54.
[6] 贲可荣, 张彦铎. 人工智能[M]. 第3版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 348.
[7] 孙正樑. 人工智能生成内容的著作权问题探析[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(6): 190-204.
[8] 徐家力. 人工智能生成物的著作权归属[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 45(4): 37-49.
[9] 杨利华. 人工智能生成物著作权问题探究[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(4): 102-114.