共情与亲社会行为的关系：情绪调节策略的中介作用
The Relationship between Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation Strategies
摘要: 研究以情绪维持假说为理论基础，核心分析共情与亲社会行为的因果关系，论述其作用逻辑及约束条件，针对大学生群体的共情能力、情绪调节方式及亲社会行为表现展开调查分析，探究人口学变量的作用规律，探究共情程度、情绪调节模式与亲社会活动的相关性，由此进一步分析情绪调节策略的中介效果。本调研针对成都地区某所大学开展问卷数据收集工作，采用SPSS25.0软件及其Process插件对有效问卷数据进行处理与分析，采用相关分析、中介效应检验等统计方法对数据进行分析处理。相关分析结果表明，认知共情、认知重评与亲社会行为三者间两两均存在显著正相关，而情感共情及表达抑制策略与其他变量的相关均未达到显著水平。随后的中介分析揭示，认知重评是连接认知共情与亲社会行为的重要中介，其部分中介效应占总效应的32.62%。研究通过厘清这些变量间的动态关系，为理解和促进大学生的亲社会行为提供了新的数据支持和干预视角。
Abstract: This study employs the emotional sustainment hypothesis as its theoretical foundation, focusing on analyzing the causal relationship between empathy and prosocial behavior. It examines the operational logic and constraints of this relationship, conducting an investigative analysis of college students’ empathy capacity, emotional regulation methods, and prosocial behavior manifestations. The research explores the patterns of demographic variables, investigates the correlations between empathy levels, emotional regulation patterns, and prosocial activities, and further analyzes the mediating effects of emotional regulation strategies. Questionnaire data were collected from a university in Chengdu. Valid responses were processed and analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software with its Process plugin, employing statistical methods including correlation analysis and mediation effect testing. Correlation results revealed significant positive correlations between cognitive empathy, cognitive reappraisal, and prosocial behavior in all pairwise comparisons. Emotional empathy and expression suppression strategies showed no significant correlations with other variables. Subsequent mediation analysis revealed that cognitive reappraisal serves as a key mediator linking cognitive empathy and prosocial behavior, accounting for 32.62% of the total effect. By clarifying these dynamic relationships, this study provides new empirical support and intervention perspectives for understanding and promoting prosocial behavior among college students.
文章引用：周怡. 共情与亲社会行为的关系：情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 306-312. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121094

参考文献

[1] 丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[2] Miller, J.G., Kahle, S. and Hastings, P.D. (2015) Roots and Benefits of Costly Giving: Children Who Are More Altruistic Have Greater Autonomic Flexibility and Less Family Wealth. Psychological Science, 26, 1038-1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 寇彧, 唐玲玲. 心境对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 49(5): 44-49.
[4] Chase-Lansdale, P.L., Wakschlag, L.S. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1995) A Psychological Perspective on the Development of Caring in Children and Youth: The Role of the Family. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 515-556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Jahoda, G. (2005) Theodor Lipps and the Shift from “Sympathy” to “Empathy”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41, 151-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 范明惠, 胡瑜. 青少年共情能力现状及相关因素[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(11): 879-884.
[7] Batson, C.D., Batson, J.G., Slingsby, J.K., Harrell, K.L., Peekna, H.M. and Todd, R.M. (1991) Empathic Joy and the Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 413-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Piliavin, J.A. and Charng, H. (1990) Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 王昊. 初中生成就同伴依恋、共情能力与亲社会行为的相关研究及教育对策[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2020.
[10] 方凤. 共情与青少年亲社会行为的关系[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2020.
[11] 赵俊茹, 李幼穗. 交流方式对儿童青少年合作行为影响的发展研究[J]. 心理科学, 26(3): 545-546.
[12] Aldao, A. and Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012) The Influence of Context on the Implementation of Adaptive Emotion Regulation Strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 493-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 谭恩达, 邹颖敏, 何家俊, 黄敏儿. 共情与主观幸福感: 情绪调节的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(5): 672-674.
[14] 李荣. 共情能力、情感风格对情绪调节的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2013.
[15] Davis, M.H. (1983) Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] 张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 等. 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(2): 155-157.
[17] 丛文君. 大学生亲社会行为与人格特质的关系[J]. 江西社会科学, 2014, 34(2): 245-249.
[18] Gross, J.J. and John, O.P. (2003) Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(1): 215-223.
[20] 范明惠. 青少年共情能力的现状、影响因素及其训练[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 温州: 温州大学, 2018.
[21] 黄翯青, 苏彦捷. 共情的毕生发展: 一个双过程的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 434-441.
[22] 范敏. 特质焦虑、情绪调节策略和共情的相关研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2020.
[23] 陈井芳, 黄金银, 王小丽. 浙江省高职院校新生紧急救护情境下的亲社会行为现状分析[J]. 护理研究, 2014, 28(9): 1065-7.
[24] 俞家程. 中学生共情与亲社会行为的关系[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2021.
[25] 周明慧. 自闭特质与亲社会行为的关系: 认知重评的中介作用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 漳州: 闽南师范大学, 2022.
[26] Gross, J.J. (2015) Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐