企业战略激进度对企业绩效的影响——以恒生电子为例
The Impact of Corporate Strategic Aggressiveness on Corporate Performance—A Case Study of Hundsun Technologies Inc.
摘要: 本文以恒生电子为例,探讨企业战略激进度对企业绩效的影响。研究发现,恒生电子在资源投入、市场拓展、技术创新和财务策略四个维度上表现出显著的激进特征,形成了“激进投入–快速迭代–稳健保障”的战略闭环。这种战略激进度在推动技术创新、扩大市场份额和增强长期发展动能方面发挥了积极作用,但同时也带来了短期财务压力、成本控制难题和管理效率下降等挑战。通过案例分析,本文揭示了战略激进度与企业绩效的双向影响关系,并提出动态资源配置、财务弹性调节、优化市场拓展节奏等优化建议,以实现战略激进度与绩效的平衡。研究不仅丰富了金融科技领域战略管理的理论视角,也为企业在复杂市场环境中制定战略提供了实践参考。
Abstract: Taking Hundsun Technologies Inc. as a case study, this paper explores the impact of corporate strategic aggressiveness on corporate performance. The study finds that Hundsun Technologies Inc. exhibits significant aggressive characteristics in four dimensions, namely resource investment, market expansion, technological innovation, and financial strategies, forming a strategic closed loop of “aggressive investment-rapid iteration-stable guarantee”. Such strategic aggressiveness plays a positive role in promoting technological innovation, expanding market share, and enhancing long-term development momentum, but at the same time, it also brings challenges such as short-term financial pressure, cost control difficulties, and declining management efficiency. Through case analysis, this paper reveals the two-way influence relationship between strategic aggressiveness and corporate performance, and puts forward optimization suggestions including dynamic resource allocation, financial flexibility adjustment, and optimizing the pace of market expansion to achieve a balance between strategic aggressiveness and performance. The study not only enriches the theoretical perspective of strategic management in the fintech field, but also provides practical references for enterprises to formulate strategies in a complex market environment.
文章引用:颜鑫鑫. 企业战略激进度对企业绩效的影响——以恒生电子为例[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2025, 14(6): 1539-1551. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2025.146172

参考文献

[1] Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. McGraw-Hill.
[2] Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (2003) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 黎来芳, 孙河涛. 企业战略激进度与融券卖空规模[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2019(2): 74-84.
[4] 翟淑萍, 白冠男, 白素文. 企业战略定位影响现金持有策略吗? [J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2019(5): 62-73.
[5] 翟淑萍, 孙雪娇, 闫红悦. 企业战略激进程度与债务期限结构[J]. 金融论坛, 2019, 24(12): 38-49+59.
[6] 袁蓉丽, 孙沛楠, 李瑞敬. 董事高管责任保险对企业战略激进度影响研究——基于中国A 股上市公司的实证分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2021(4): 101-113.
[7] 王墨林, 阎海峰, 宋渊洋. 企业数字化程度对战略激进度的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(5): 667-675.
[8] 王晓红, 赵美琳, 张少鹏, 等. 企业战略激进度、数字化转型与ESG表现——企业生命周期的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(3): 77-84.
[9] 曹裕, 寇芙柔, 庄严. 进攻还是防御? 供应链视角下企业战略激进度对企业绩效的影响[J/OL]. 管理评论, 1-18. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.20250327.005, 2025-12-08.[CrossRef
[10] Bentley, K.A., Omer, T.C. and Sharp, N.Y. (2013) Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 780-817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Higgins, D., Omer, T.C. and Phillips, J.D. (2015) The Influence of a Firm's Business Strategy on Its Tax Aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32, 674-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 叶康涛, 张姗姗, 张艺馨. 企业战略差异与会计信息的价值相关性[J]. 会计研究, 2014(5): 44-51.
[13] 苏涛永, 孟丽. 企业战略激进度、管理者变更与技术距离[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(1): 89-98.
[14] 马宁, 官建成. 影响我国工业企业技术创新绩效的关键因素[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2000(3): 16-20.
[15] 刘世全. 企业绩效影响因素分析——以深市上市公司2011年数据为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2013(36): 80-83.
[16] 辛金国, 潘小芳, 管晓永. 家族性因素对家族企业绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11): 118-125.
[17] 陈翊. 上市公司经营绩效影响因素实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(23): 185-188.
[18] 仲东亭, 任浩. 高新技术企业绩效影响因素实证分析——基于上海全样本数据[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(5): 90-98.
[19] 杨阳. 双因素理论视角下人性化管理对饲料企业绩效的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2024(12): 153-156.