科研数据产品的电子商务交易模式研究
Research on the E-Commerce Transaction Model for Scientific Research Data Products
摘要: 科研数据作为高价值数据要素,其市场化流通面临渠道不畅、定价困难、信任缺失等现实困境。本文运用电子商务理论和平台经济理论,系统分析科研数据产品的网络交易模式。研究发现,科研数据产品兼具知识产品和数字产品的双重属性,其电子商务化面临产品标准化、价值评估与定价、交易信任缺失、在线交付与服务保障四重困境。基于信号博弈模型,本文揭示了平台信任机制设计的内在逻辑,指出认证成本差异、价格溢价匹配和事后惩罚机制是促进高质量数据产品交易的关键要素。针对上述困境,本文提出了构建分层分类的产品标准化体系、创新多元化的动态定价机制、建立多层次的信任保障机制、打造智能化的在线交付服务体系等创新方向,并阐明了具体的实施路径与技术支持方案。研究结论为数据交易所等网络交易平台的运营优化和科研机构的数据产品化提供了理论指导与实践参考。
Abstract: Scientific research data, as high-value data elements, encounter practical challenges in market-oriented circulation, including obstructed channels, difficulties in pricing, and a lack of trust. This study employs e-commerce theory and platform economy theory to systematically analyze the online transaction model for scientific research data products. The findings reveal that scientific research data products possess the dual attributes of knowledge products and digital products, and their e-commerce implementation faces four major dilemmas: product standardization, value assessment and pricing, absence of transaction trust, and online delivery with service assurance. Based on a signaling game model, this paper reveals the intrinsic logic of platform trust mechanism design, indicating that certification cost differentiation, price premium matching, and ex-post punishment mechanisms are key elements in promoting high-quality data product transactions. Addressing these dilemmas, this paper proposes innovative directions, including the construction of a hierarchical classification system for product standardization, the innovation of diversified dynamic pricing mechanisms, the establishment of multi-level trust assurance mechanisms, and the development of an intelligent online delivery service system, while clarifying specific implementation paths and technical support solutions. The research conclusions provide theoretical guidance and practical references for the operational optimization of online transaction platforms such as data exchanges and the productization of research data by scientific institutions.
文章引用:章韡. 科研数据产品的电子商务交易模式研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 2318-2325. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124118

参考文献

[1] 马海群, 于同同, 王瀚功, 等. “数据二十条”前后我国央地数据基础制度政策比较与评估研究[J]. 科技情报研究, 2025, 7(2): 23-34.
[2] 何兴, 周佳. 论我国科研数据权益保护的困境与纾解[J]. 浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(3): 297-303.
[3] 李丽, 张巧, 王瑞. 数据交易市场中交易主体创新管理机制探索[J]. 网络安全与数据治理, 2025, 44(10): 30-34.
[4] 李倩, 李海美. 数据交易平台经营者安全保障义务的规范构造[J]. 石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 38(6): 76-83.
[5] Koutroumpis, P., Leiponen, A. and Thomas, L.D.W. (2020) Markets for Data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29, 645-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lin, J., Huang, Z. and Tang, Y. (2025) Pricing for Data Assets Based on Data Quality, Quantity and Utility on the Perspective of Consumer Heterogeneity. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 37, 3641-3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Srivastava, G., Flath, C.M., Lin, J.C. and Zhang, Y. (2023) Challenges and Outcomes Using Big Data as a Service. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66, 1-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Sun, D. (2024) I Trust You, Will You Trust Me? Asymmetry of Bilateral Trust and the Market for Technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 5410-5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chabilall, J., Brown, Q., Cengiz, N. and Moodley, K. (2024) Data as Scientific Currency: Challenges Experienced by Researchers with Sharing Health Data in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS Digital Health, 3, e0000635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A.B. (1996) Frontiers of Electronic Commerce. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing.
[11] 郑旭如, 赵玉, 周胜安, 等. 基于区块链与对抗生成网络的数据交易系统设计与实现方案[J]. 现代信息科技, 2025, 9(9): 193-198.
[12] 龚伟, 李晓华. 数据的信息本质与数据交易困境探析[J]. 经济学家, 2025(10): 47-56.
[13] Rochet, J. and Tirole, J. (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 990-1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 丁雪峰, 陈前程. 服务商组内网络外部性与物流双边平台定价策略及影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(3): 292-306.
[15] 杨悦, 李燕. 电商平台人工智能技术对顾客价值共创的影响[J]. 技术与市场, 2025, 32(4): 27-33.
[16] 曹世超. 数字经济与平台治理: 中国数字平台监管实践与全球治理启示[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2025(19): 23-25.
[17] 马小琪, 张峰领. 三方博弈视角下数据交易平台监管策略研究——以贵交所为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025, 69(18): 69-85.
[18] 经若莎. 面向数据要素市场的图书馆数据价值实现机理及路径研究[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2025, 42(11): 64-68.
[19] 徐家露. 基于双向拍卖模型的大数据产品交易定价[J]. 北方经贸, 2025(2): 118-125.
[20] 孙润康, 李金, 任宇飞, 等. 大型医院临床科研可信数据空间的技术路径研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2025, 45(4): 70-72.
[21] 杜佳诚, 宋恒, 闫弋, 等. 浅谈智能领域科研成果数据标准化交付策略[J]. 中国标准化, 2024(13): 52-59.
[22] 乔夫, 王庆德. 加快我国数据交易所生态系统建设的现实基础与发展路径研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2025(5): 88-94.
[23] 董海珍, 刘阳, 李晓青. 基于“网络竞价 + 专利拍卖”专利价值评估方法分析[J]. 产权导刊, 2025(07): 33-37.
[24] 郑富豪. 区块链技术在科研数据管理安全中的创新应用研究[J]. 海峡科学, 2025(6): 142-146.
[25] 毛锋晨. 云计算环境下资源动态分配算法的优化策略[J]. 信息记录材料, 2025, 26(2): 178-180.