基于数据包络分析(DEA)与随机前沿分析(SFA)的职业体育俱乐部运营效率评价与优化研究
Evaluation and Optimization of Operational Efficiency of Professional Sports Clubs: Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA)
DOI: 10.12677/aam.2025.1412508, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 王宇涵:承德医学院图书馆,河北 承德;席世龙:浙江海洋大学经济与管理学院,浙江 舟山;高 谨:长安大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安;卢美婷:生科寰宇(福建)科技有限公司,福建 石狮;刘 博*:承德医学院护理学院,河北 承德
关键词: 职业体育俱乐部运营效率DEA-SFA模型Malmquist指数制度–治理–技术协同混合所有制Professional Sports Clubs Operational Efficiency DEA-SFA Model Malmquist Index Institution-Governance-Technology Synergy Mixed Ownership
摘要: 本文以我国职业体育俱乐部运营效率为研究核心,旨在破解其“规模扩张与效率滞后”的发展矛盾。基于“制度–利益–系统”理论框架,采用DEA-SFA融合模型与Malmquist指数,以2019~2023年中国足球协会超级联赛(中超) 16家俱乐部为核心样本、荷兰足球甲级联赛(荷甲)与葡萄牙足球超级联赛(葡超)各10家俱乐部为参照样本,构建“静态测度–动态演化–机制解析–路径设计”的研究体系。研究发现:我国职业体育俱乐部整体运营效率显著低于荷甲、葡超等可比联赛,技术效率层面的“管理协同失灵”与规模效率层面的“投入结构错配”是核心短板;效率演化呈现“改革驱动–技术跟进”的阶段性特征,2021年“管办分离”改革后进入“效率–技术协同”增长期,但技术进步贡献率(0.4%)远低于荷甲(1.8%)与葡超(1.5%),内生创新动力不足;效率输出受“制度–治理–技术”三维因素协同影响,混合所有制在高质量制度环境下展现显著效率优势,是破解困境的关键切入点。研究不仅通过方法整合与本土化理论构建,丰富了体育管理学与制度经济学的交叉研究,更提出“治理优化–技术赋能生态构建”的分阶段提升路径,为俱乐部运营、联赛治理与政策制定提供精准指引。
Abstract: This study takes the operational efficiency of professional sports clubs in China as the core research object, aiming to resolve the developmental contradiction between “scale expansion and efficiency lag”. Based on the “institution-interest-system” theoretical framework, an integrated research system of “static measurement-dynamic evolution-mechanism analysis-path design” is constructed by adopting the DEA-SFA integrated model and Malmquist index. Taking 16 clubs in the Chinese Super League (CSL) from 2019 to 2023 as the core sample and 10 clubs each from the Eredivisie (Netherlands) and Primeira Liga (Portugal) as the reference samples, the research finds that: the overall operational efficiency of Chinese professional sports clubs is significantly lower than that of comparable leagues such as the Eredivisie and Primeira Liga, with “management synergy failure” at the technical efficiency level and “input structure mismatch” at the scale efficiency level as the core shortcomings; the efficiency evolution presents a phased characteristic of “reform-driven and technology-following”, entering the “efficiency-technology synergy” growth period after the “separation of management and operation” reform in 2021, but the contribution rate of technological progress (0.4%) is much lower than that of the Eredivisie (1.8%) and Primeira Liga (1.5%), indicating insufficient endogenous innovation motivation; the efficiency output is jointly affected by the three-dimensional synergy of “institution-governance-technology”, and mixed ownership shows significant efficiency advantages in a high-quality institutional environment, which is the key entry point to solve the predicament. This study not only enriches the interdisciplinary research of sports management and institutional economics through method integration and localized theoretical construction, but also proposes a phased improvement path of “governance optimization-technology empowerment-ecosystem construction”, providing precise guidance for club operation, league governance and policy formulation.
文章引用:王宇涵, 席世龙, 高谨, 卢美婷, 刘博. 基于数据包络分析(DEA)与随机前沿分析(SFA)的职业体育俱乐部运营效率评价与优化研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2025, 14(12): 297-310. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2025.1412508

参考文献

[1] 庞博, 杨献南. 我国职业体育俱乐部利益共享框架及推进路径[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报, 2022, 41(6): 97-102.
[2] 李笋南, 张少杰, 杨献南. 我国职业体育俱乐部竞赛寻租: 特征、机理与治理路径[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报, 2024, 43(2): 82-88+130.
[3] 钟秉枢, 韩勇, 邢晓燕, 等. 论新发展阶段我国职业体育俱乐部的规范化发展[J]. 体育学研究, 2022, 36(6): 1-13.
[4] 杨献南. 中国职业体育俱乐部社会责任的演进: 全面回顾、深度透视与未来走向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(5): 40-45+58.
[5] 杜丛新, 钟进, 吴家乐, 等. 欧美职业体育俱乐部所有权形式及特征研究[J]. 西安体育学院学报, 2021, 38(6): 660-666.
[6] 时建中, 李四红. 体育赛事转播权市场销售行为的反垄断法规制研究及启示[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2020, 32(3): 267-273.
[7] 江小涓. 体育产业发展: 新的机遇与挑战[J]. 体育科学, 2019, 39(7): 3-11.
[8] Melgarejo, Z., Arcelus, J.F. and Simon-Elorz, K. (2011) A Three-Stage DEA-SFA Efficiency Analysis of Labour-Owned and Mercantile Firms. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 7, 573-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Mizobuchi, H. and Zelenyuk, V. (2025) Laspeyres-Paasche Bounds for Productivity Index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1-15.
[10] Horváthová, J. and Mokrišová, M. (2024) The Use of the Data Envelopment Analysis-Malmquist Approach to Measure the Performance of Digital Transformation in EU Countries. Economies, 12, Article No. 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 王立彦, 谭清美. 基于Malmquist指数的区域全要素生产效率实证分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2025, 44(7): 135-140.
[12] 李明星, 蒋永穆. 论“新型生产关系”: 概念建构、内涵体现与发展路径[J]. 改革与战略, 2025, 41(4): 80-89.
[13] 郑石桥, 邓兆瑞. 混合所有制改革对审计重要性水平的影响[J]. 财会通讯, 2025(16): 51-56.
[14] Han, Z., Chen, L. and Zhong, T. (2025) Mixed-Ownership Reform and AI Adoption in State-Owned Enterprises: A Pre-Registered Report. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 94, Article ID: 102954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Ogbuigwe, T.D., Gao, H., Kahiya, E. and Chugh, R. (2025) Hybrid Ownership and Internationalization of Emerging Market Firms: An Institution-Based View. International Business Review, 34, Article ID: 102501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Balaha, F., Albinali, H., Alrabiah, H., Ali, M. and Bahroun, Z. (2025) An Analytical Review of Data Integration for Decision Support in Smart Manufacturing. Decision Analytics Journal, 17, Article ID: 100647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 黄宇静, 严文华, 严晗, 等. 从理念走向实践: 竞争平衡驱动职业体育高质量发展[J]. 体育世界, 2025(8): 74-76.
[18] 任静, 马茂森, 侯雪婷. 文献计量视域下我国职业体育的研究演进与展望[J]. 湖北体育科技, 2025, 44(4): 71-75.
[19] 杨双燕. 体育经理人职业现状及发展前景[J]. 中国培训, 2025(7): 53-56.
[20] 刘稚娇. 政府介入职业体育行业的法律规制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学, 2025.
[21] 胡雁雪, 舒盛芳. 治理的趋同: 欧美女子职业体育联盟治理模式与机制创新的窥探与镜鉴——基于生态与资源视角[J]. 南京体育学院学报, 2025, 24(5): 53-68+87.