人工智能赋能地质灾害风险预测:基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Geological Disaster Risk Prediction: Knowledge Map Analysis Based on CiteSpace
摘要: 随着人工智能技术的快速发展,地质灾害风险预测领域正经历从传统方法到数据驱动模型的转变。本文基于CiteSpace软件对2002年10月至2025年10月间在CNKI与Web of Science数据库中以“地质灾害”与“人工智能/机器学习”为主题的文献进行了可视化计量分析,系统揭示了人工智能技术在地质灾害研究中的发展脉络与前沿趋势。研究发现,相关文献自2018年以来显著增长,人工智能技术的应用逐步进入快速发展阶段,研究热点主要集中在“滑坡易发性评价”“机器学习模型优化”和“遥感与多源数据融合”等方向。深度学习、随机森林、支持向量机等算法成为主流技术,推动风险评估从定性分析向定量预测、从经验方法向智能化决策转型。未来,结合可解释性人工智能(XAI)与多源异构数据的融合分析,将是提升地质灾害风险预测精度与科学性的关键。本文为学者深入理解地质灾害智能化研究的演化路径与发展趋势提供了有益参考。
Abstract: With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the field of geological disaster risk prediction is undergoing a transition from traditional methods to data-driven models. Based on CiteSpace software, this paper makes a visual quantitative analysis of the literature on “geological disasters” and “artificial intelligence/machine learning” in CNKI and Web of Science databases from October 2002 to October 2025, and systematically reveals the development context and frontier trend of artificial intelligence technology in geological disaster research. It is found that the relevant literature has increased significantly since 2018, and the application of artificial intelligence technology has gradually entered a stage of rapid development. The research hotspots mainly focus on “landslide susceptibility evaluation”, “machine learning model optimization” and “remote sensing and multi-source data fusion”. Deep learning, random forest, support vector machine and other algorithms have become mainstream technologies, which promote the transformation of risk assessment from qualitative analysis to quantitative prediction, from empirical methods to intelligent decision-making. In the future, the combination of interpretable artificial intelligence (XAI) and multi-source heterogeneous data fusion analysis will be the key to improving the accuracy and scientificity of geological disaster risk prediction. This paper provides a useful reference for scholars to deeply understand the evolution path and development trend of intelligent research on geological disasters.
文章引用:李春雷. 人工智能赋能地质灾害风险预测:基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2025, 15(12): 1592-1604. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2025.1512148

参考文献

[1] 刘传正, 沈伟志, 黄帅. 中国地质灾害预防应对战略思考[J]. 灾害学, 2022, 37(3): 1-4+11.
[2] 王存智, 张炜, 李晨冬, 等. 基于GIS和层次分析法的沙溪流域滑坡地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 中国地质调查, 2022, 9(5): 51-60.
[3] 张茂省, 贾俊, 王毅, 等. 基于人工智能(AI)的地质灾害防控体系建设[J]. 西北地质, 2019, 52(2): 103-116.
[4] 胡安龙, 王孔伟, 李建林, 等. 基于智能算法优化支持向量机模型的滑坡稳定性预测[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2016, 25(5): 46-54.
[5] Liu, Z., Gilbert, G., Cepeda, J.M., Lysdahl, A.O.K., Piciullo, L., Hefre, H., et al. (2021) Modelling of Shallow Landslides with Machine Learning Algorithms. Geoscience Frontiers, 12, 385-393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Xiao, Q., Wang, S., He, N. and Gurkalo, F. (2024) Risk Zoning Method of Potential Sudden Debris Flow Based on Deep Neural Network. Water, 16, Article 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 仉文岗, 何昱苇, 王鲁琦, 等. 基于水系分区的滑坡易发性机器学习分析方法: 以重庆市奉节县为例[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(5): 2024-2038.
[8] 方然可, 刘艳辉, 黄志全. 基于机器学习的区域滑坡危险性评价方法综述[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021, 32(4): 1-8.
[9] 孙德亮, 陈丹璐, 密长林, 等. 基于随机森林-特征递归消除模型的可解释性缓丘岭谷地貌滑坡易发性评价[J]. 地质力学学报, 2023, 29(2): 202-219.
[10] 王明远, 陈培. 基于CiteSpace的滑坡监测可视化分析[J]. 价值工程, 2025, 44(27): 90-93.
[11] 郭飞, 赖鹏, 黄发明, 等. 基于知识图谱的滑坡易发性评价文献综述及研究进展[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2024, 49(5): 1584-1606.
[12] 艾昕宇, 何鹏, 孟祥振, 等. 基于EM-FR-C5.0DT耦合模型的输气管道地质灾害风险预测模型[J]. 油气与新能源, 2024, 36(4): 84-96+107.
[13] Arabameri, A., Pradhan, B., Rezaei, K. and Lee, C. (2019) Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Statistical-and Artificial Intelligence-Based FR-RF Integrated Model and Multiresolution Dems. Remote Sensing, 11, Article 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Biswajeet, P. and Saro, L. (2007) Utilization of Optical Remote Sensing Data and GIS Tools for Regional Landslide Hazard Analysis Using an Artificial Neural Network Model. Earth Science Frontiers, 14, 143-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Yu, B., Yan, J., Li, Y., et al. (2025) Risk Assessment of Multi-Hazards in Hangzhou: A Socioeconomic and Risk Mapping Approach Using the CatBoost-SHAP Model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15, 640-656.
[16] Xu, C. and Xu, X. (2013) Controlling Parameter Analyses and Hazard Mapping for Earthquake-Triggered Landslides: An Example from a Square Region in Beichuan County, Sichuan Province, China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 3827-3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 何亚莉, 张春红. 基于CiteSpace的滑坡监测预警文献计量分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2023, 39(8): 97-102.
[18] 方然可, 刘艳辉, 苏永超, 等. 基于逻辑回归的四川青川县区域滑坡灾害预警模型[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(1): 181-187.
[19] 叶润青, 邓清禄, 王海庆. 基于图像分类方法滑坡识别与特征提取——以归州老城滑坡为例[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2007(6): 574-577.
[20] 龙玉洁, 李为乐, 黄润秋, 等. 汶川地震震后10a绵远河流域滑坡遥感自动提取与演化趋势分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2020, 45(11): 1792-1800.
[21] 朱彪彪, 曹伟, 虞鹏鹏, 等. 基于CiteSpace的地质大数据与人工智能研究热点及前沿分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 73-86.
[22] 周保, 隋嘉, 孙皓, 等. 基于多源遥感数据的青海省地质灾害评价[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2022, 31(4): 231-240.