第三方干预在信任修复中的作用及影响
The Role and Impact of Third-Party Intervention in Trust Repair
摘要: 信任是社会交往与合作的核心基础,信任破裂会引发多重个体与社会代价,而传统二元关系中的信任修复常面临困境。随着信任破裂的现象日益增多,第三方干预对维护社会公平规范具有重要意义。第三方干预作为多方互动场景下的重要社会机制,为信任修复提供了新的解决路径。因此,越来越多的研究者开始关注第三方干预在信任修复中的作用,第三方干预包括第三方惩罚和第三方补偿两种。。第三方干预不仅是缓解冲突、恢复信任的有效途径,还能够通过提供公正的信息和协调利益冲突,推动信任的修复。文章通过梳理前人研究基础上,深入剖析第三方干预在信任修复中的作用及影响,探讨其在不同情境下的应用及其效果,以此寻找更好的修复破损信任的方法,达到信任修复效果的最大化,也为信任修复领域的后续研究提供理论参考。
Abstract: Trust is the core foundation of social interaction and cooperation, and a breakdown of trust can lead to multiple individual and social costs. Trust repair in traditional binary relationships often faces difficulties. As incidents of trust breakdown become increasingly frequent, third-party interventions play an important role in maintaining social fairness norms. As a crucial social mechanism in multi-party interaction scenarios, third-party intervention provides a new pathway for trust repair. Therefore, more and more researchers have begun to focus on the role of third-party intervention in trust repair. Third-party interventions include punishment and compensation. Such interventions not only serve as effective means to alleviate conflict and restore trust but also promote trust repair by providing fair information and coordinating conflicts of interest. This paper, based on a review of previous research, deeply analyzes the role and impact of third-party intervention in trust repair, explores its applications and effects in different contexts, in order to find better methods for repairing broken trust, maximize the effect of trust restoration, and provide theoretical references for future research in the field of trust repair.
文章引用:乔芳芳. 第三方干预在信任修复中的作用及影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 395-403. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121105

参考文献

[1] Bottom, W.P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S.E. and Murnighan, J.K. (2002) When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation. Organization Science, 13, 497-513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Brodt, S.E. and Neville, L. (2013) Repairing Trust to Preserve Balance: A Bal-ance-Theoretic Approach to Trust Breach and Repair in Groups. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6, 49-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kim, P.H., Ferrin, D.L., Cooper, C.D. and Dirks, K.T. (2004) Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology versus Denial for Repairing Competence versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 89, 104-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Tomlinson, E.C. and Mryer, R.C. (2009) The Role of Causal Attribution Dimensions in Trust Repair. Academy of Management Review, 34, 85-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 于伟周. 信任违背时间和道歉对信任修复的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 开封: 河南大学, 2019.
[6] 张敬敏. 第三方积极评价及修复策略对人际信任修复的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2020.
[7] Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2002) Erratum: Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature, 415, 137-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Charness, G. and Gneezy, U. (2008) What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 29-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 刘映杰. 得失情境下的公平维护行为: 第三方惩罚与第三方补偿[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018.
[10] 王蒙. 社会距离对第三方利他行为的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 宁波: 宁波大学, 2020.
[11] 李向丽. 悲伤共情对不同公平程度及得失情境下个体第三方干预的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2019.
[12] Leliveld, M.C., van Dijk, E. and van Beest, I. (2012) Punishing and Compensating Others at Your Own Expense: The Role of Empathic Concern on Reactions to Distributive Injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 135-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Lotz, S., Okimoto, T.G., Schlösser, T. and Fetchenhauer, D. (2011) Punitive versus Com-pensatory Reactions to Injustice: Emotional Antecedents to Third-Party Interventions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 477-480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 徐杰, 孙向超, 董悦, 等. 人情与公正的抉择:社会距离对第三方干预的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2017, 40(5): 1175-1181.
[15] Schroeder, D.A., Steel, J.E., Woodell, A.J. and Bembenek, A.F. (2003) Justice within Social Dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374-387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Goffman, E. (1955) On Face Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in So-cial Interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 常硕峰. 人际交往中第三方对人际信任的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
[18] 胡祥培, 尹进. 信任传递模型研究综述[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 15(4): 46-51+57+135.
[19] 刘白鸽. 被信任者社会身份和第三方信息对大学生人际信任的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.
[20] Kahneman, D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449-1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 郭禹辰, 马剑虹. 第三方惩罚的作用机制——基于认知情绪双系统模型(摘要) [C]//中国心理学会. 第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 杭州: 浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 2018: 670-672.
[22] Evans, J.S.B.T. and Stanovich, K.E. (2013) Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Per-spectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Rand, D.G. and Kraft-Todd, G.T. (2013) Reflection Does Not Undermine Self-Interested Prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Qu, L., Dou, W., You, C. and Qu, C. (2014) The Processing Course of Conflicts in Third-Party Punishment: An Event-Related Potential Study. PsyCh Journal, 3, 214-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Artavia-Mora, L., Bedi, A.S. and Rieger, M. (2017) Intuitive Help and Punishment in the Field. European Economic Review, 92, 133-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1986) Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. The Journal of Business, 59, S285-S300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. (2003) The Nature of Human Altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Yang, F., Choi, Y., Misch, A., Yang, X. and Dunham, Y. (2018) In Defense of the Commons: Young Children Negatively Evaluate and Sanction Free Riders. Psychological Science, 29, 1598-1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 陈思静, 邢懿琳, 翁异静, 黎常. 第三方惩罚对合作的溢出效应: 基于社会规范的解释[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 758-772.
[30] 刘国芳, 辛自强. 惩罚对信任与合作的影响: 争论与解释[J]. 上海师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2014, 43(1): 146-152.
[31] Sitkin, S.B. and Roth, N.L. (1993) Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367-392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Sun, H. and Bigoni, M. (2018) A Fine Rule from a Brutish World? An Experiment on Endogenous Punishment Institution and Trust. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 77, 158-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Behnk, S., Barre-da-Tarrazona, I. and García-Gallego, A. (2018) Punishing Liars—How Monitoring Affects Honesty and Trust. PLOS ONE, 13, e0205420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] 阮青松, 狄瑶. 中国企业经理人是自利和理性的吗?——一个实验经济学研究[J]. 上海管理科学, 2008, 30(1): 47-50.
[35] 陈颖, 刘建华. 信任博弈中外生性奖惩机制效应的实验研究[J]. 湖北文理学院学报, 2018, 39(11): 5-11.
[36] Chica, M., Chiong, R., Adam, M.T.P. and Teubner, T. (2019) An Evolutionary Game Model with Punishment and Protection to Promote Trust in the Sharing Economy. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 19789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] 袁晓劲, 郭斯萍. 群体身份与惩罚对信任与合作的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020(8): 496-502.
[38] Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E. and Kramer, R.M. (1996) Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In: Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage Publications Inc, 166-195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Pan, X. and Houser, D. (2019) Why Trust Out-Groups? The Role of Punish-ment under Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 158, 236-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Okimoto, T.G. and Tyler, T.R. (2007) Is Compensation Enough? Relational Concerns in Responding to Unintended Inequity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 399-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Gasparotto, L.S., Pacheco, N.A., Basso, K., Corte, V.F.D., Rabello, G.C. and Gallon, S. (2018) The Role of Regulation and Financial Compensation on Trust Recovery. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26, 10-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Desmet, P.T.M., Cremer, D.D. and Dijk, E.V. (2011) In Money We Trust? The Use of Financial Compensations to Repair Trust in the Aftermath of Distributive Harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 75-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Haesevoets, T., Reinders Folmer, C., De Cremer, D. and Van Hiel, A. (2013) Money Isn’t All That Matters: The Use of Financial Compensation and Apologies to Preserve Relationships in the Aftermath of Dis-tributive Harm. Journal of Economic Psychology, 35, 95-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] Gillespie, N. and Dietz, G. (2009) Trust Repair after an Organization-Level Failure. Academy of Management Review, 34, 127-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[45] Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef