电子商务平台责任视域下“过度包装”的预防性公益诉讼研究
Research on Preventive Public Interest Litigation of “Excessive Packaging” from the Perspective of E-Commerce Platform Liability
摘要: 随着电子商务蓬勃发展,其过度包装导致的环境问题日益凸显。尽管在宏观上,我国《电子商务法》已为电商平台设定了环境保护的法律义务。但实践中,电商平台企业普遍缺乏承担环境责任的内在动力,同时又面临着外部监管制度不完善、包装标准缺失、消费者环保意识不足等多重障碍,致使电商平台在应对过度包装问题上行动迟缓,难以有效履行其应尽的环境保护责任。为破解此困局,本文提出构建全链条治理体系,并引入预防性环境公益诉讼作为核心制度工具。针对包装污染的滞后性与不可逆性,通过整合数据共享、协同施压与行为禁令三大环节,并辅以法律、技术和社会监督的保障体系,形成一条高效的检行衔接诉讼路径,从而实现对平台的有效规制。
Abstract: With the vigorous development of e-commerce, the environmental problems caused by excessive packaging have become increasingly prominent. Although at a macro level, China’s “E-Commerce Law” has set environmental protection legal obligations for e-commerce platforms, in practice, e-commerce platform enterprises generally lack the intrinsic motivation to assume environmental responsibilities, and at the same time face multiple obstacles such as imperfect external regulatory systems, the absence of packaging standards, and insufficient environmental awareness among consumers, which have led to sluggish actions by e-commerce platforms in addressing the issue of excessive packaging and making it difficult for them to effectively fulfill their environmental protection responsibilities. To break through this predicament, this paper proposes to build a full-chain governance system and introduce preventive environmental public interest litigation as the core institutional tool. In response to the lag and irreversibility of packaging pollution, by integrating data sharing, collaborative pressure, and behavioral injunctions, and supplemented by a guarantee system of laws, technology, and social supervision, an efficient prosecution and enforcement connection litigation path is formed, thereby achieving effective regulation of the platform.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
徐明, 陈亮. 中美经贸协议背景下电商知识产权保护优化路径研究[J]. 国际贸易, 2020(3): 37-43.
|
|
[2]
|
国家邮政局. 2025年10月中国快递发展指数报告[R]. 北京: 国家邮政局, 2024.
|
|
[3]
|
中共中央国务院关于加快经济社会发展全面绿色转型的意见[C]//中国企业改革与发展研究会. 2024蓝皮书中国企业改革发展. 北京: 世界知识出版社, 2025: 379-384.
|
|
[4]
|
余敏江, 贾德清. 生态“颜值”何以转化为经济“产值”: 生态产品价值转化的内在机理与实践路径[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 27(4): 69-80.
|
|
[5]
|
魏薪郦. 预防性环境公益诉讼的域外借鉴及发展探索[J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(Z1): 84-87.
|
|
[6]
|
贾瑞雪. 打开“黑箱”: 平台社会视野下个人数据收集的结构性特征[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2022, 29(7): 38-54, 127.
|
|
[7]
|
李瑰华. 论预防性行政公益诉讼[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2025, 43(1): 176-188.
|
|
[8]
|
秦天宝. 环境信息依法披露的功能定位与优化路径[J]. 政治与法律, 2025(2): 115-129.
|
|
[9]
|
曹明德, 马腾. 我国生态环境民事预防性救济体系的建构[J]. 政法论丛, 2021(2): 150-160.
|
|
[10]
|
李颖. 引导简约绿色消费规范生产经营行为——市场监管总局公布2022年整治商品过度包装等问题典型案例[J]. 中国质量万里行, 2023(1): 18-20.
|