股骨夹具修复股骨粗隆间骨折的有限元分析
Finite Element Analysis of Femoral Prosthesis for the Repair of Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.1412662, PDF,   
作者: 陈升阳, 章龙飞, 蔡宇浩, 陈嘉智, 武永霞:上海工程技术大学机械与汽车工程学院,上海;窦 帮:上海交通大学医学院附属松江医院,上海
关键词: 股骨粗隆间骨折有限元分析等效应力变形Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Finite Element Analysis Equivalent Stress Deformation
摘要: 针对股骨粗隆间骨折的修复问题,本文以最常见的股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)装置作为测试装置。本文采用有限元分析的方法,对比分析了髓内钉主钉与螺旋刀片的不同夹角(68˚、64˚和72˚)静止站立状态下股骨、内固定装置变形及应力的分布特征,并与同等条件下正常股骨的力学特征进行了比较。结果表明,68˚ PFNA组的股骨最大变形与正常股骨最为相似,最大等效应力集中在骨钉处,相较于64˚和72˚ PFNA组更有利于骨折修复,故佐证68˚为股骨夹具修复的最佳角度。
Abstract: Focusing on the repair of intertrochanteric fractures, this study uses the most common Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) device as the test apparatus. Employing the finite element analysis method, the study compares and analyzes the distribution characteristics of deformation and stress in the femur and internal fixation device under static standing conditions for different angles (68˚, 64˚, and 72˚) between the main nail and the spiral blade. These findings are then compared with the mechanical characteristics of a normal femur under the same conditions. The results indicate that the maximum deformation of the femur in the 68˚ PFNA group most closely resembles that of a normal femur, with the maximum equivalent stress concentrated at the bone nail. Compared to the 64˚ and 72˚ PFNA groups, the 68˚ configuration is more conducive to fracture healing, thereby validating 68˚ as the optimal angle for femoral prosthesis repair.
文章引用:陈升阳, 章龙飞, 蔡宇浩, 陈嘉智, 武永霞, 窦帮. 股骨夹具修复股骨粗隆间骨折的有限元分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(12): 95-101. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.1412662

参考文献

[1] 宋旭彬, 吴斗, 赵恩哲, 等. 新型股骨颈螺旋刀片系统治疗股骨转子间骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2025, 29(33): 7041-7047.
[2] Zhang, C., Feng, J., Wang, S., Gao, P., Xu, L., Zhu, J., et al. (2020) Incidence of and Trends in Hip Fracture among Adults in Urban China: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. PLOS Medicine, 17, e1003180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 张强, 杨兴虎, 王金山, 等. 不同固定方式在复杂桡骨远端骨折治疗中的疗效比较[J]. 内蒙古医科大学学报, 2025, 47(3): 291-295+300.
[4] 樊国峰, 董巍, 陈胜乐, 等. 基于有限单元法的股骨干粉碎性骨折锁定板内固定优化仿真[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2014, 29(12): 1212-1214.
[5] 林臻, 陈少坚, 高连云, 等. 股骨近端抗旋髓内钉螺旋刀片两种锁定方式治疗不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的力学比较[J]. 中国现代医生, 2021, 59(21): 58-61+193.
[6] 于权, 王晖, 秦泗通, 等. 不同股骨近端外侧壁厚度置入动力髋螺钉固定失效风险的有限元分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(2): 163-166.
[7] 巩少康. 不同髓内固定方式应用于股骨粗隆间骨折的有限元分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 开封: 河南大学, 2023.