AI数据过度收集风险的驱动因素与治理策略
The Risk Sources and Governance Strategies of Excessive AI Data Collection
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.14121120, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈 瑜:大连海洋大学海洋法律与人文学院,辽宁 大连
关键词: AI数据收集技术风险扎根研究AI Data Collection Technical Risk Rooted Research
摘要: AI应用不仅带来大量的社会红利,也带来一定的社会风险,其中AI应用数据过度收集问题就是需要提前预防技术风险之一。为了探究AI应用数据过度收集风险的驱动因素,研究基于中国场景案例,运用扎根理论识别AI应用数据过度收集风险的驱动因素。研究结果表明中国场景存在四类驱动因素:超越业务范围收集数据的技术因素,未经许可或征求意见而收集、使用或公开信息数据的价值因素,政府政策过度引导的政策因素,政策制定缺乏技术伦理考量制度因素。
Abstract: The Application of AI not only generates substantial social benefits but also introduces certain societal risks. Among these, the excessive data collection by AI applications is a technical risk that requires proactive prevention. This study investigates the driving factors behind the risk of excessive data collection in AI applications. Based on case studies within the Chinese context and employing grounded theory, the research identifies the key drivers of this risk. The findings reveal four categories of driving factors in the Chinese context: technological drivers related to data collection beyond necessary business boundaries; value-based drivers involving the collection, use, or disclosure of data without permission or consultation; policy-driven drivers stemming from excessive governmental policy guidance; and institutional drivers arising from a lack of consideration for technology ethics in policy formulation.
文章引用:陈瑜. AI数据过度收集风险的驱动因素与治理策略[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 516-524. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121120

参考文献

[1] 王俊豪. 中国特色政府监管理论体系: 需求分析、构建导向与整体框架[J]. 管理世界, 2021(2): 148-164+184.
[2] 蒋洁. 人脸识别技术应用的侵权风险与控制策略[J]. 图书与情报, 2019(5): 58-64.
[3] 林伟. AI数据安全风险及应对[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(10): 105-111.
[4] Krafft, M., Arden, C.M. and Verhoef, P.C. (2017) Permission Marketing and Privacy Concerns—Why Do Customers (not) Grant Permissions? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 39-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 郭海, 李永慧. 数字经济背景下政府与平台的合作监管模式研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(10): 56-61.
[6] 刘素华. 论手机自动记录用户行动轨迹与个人信息保护[J]. 法学评论, 2020(5): 101-111.
[7] 顾理平. 大数据时代隐私信息安全的四重困境[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2019(1): 96-101.
[8] Mothersbaugh, D.L., Foxx, W.K., Beatty, S.E. and Wang, S. (2012) Disclosure Antecedents in an Online Service Context: The Role of Sensitivity of Information. Journal of Service Research, 15, 76-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 张先贵, 邱炳晟. 自动驾驶汽车数据安全风险及其治理[J]. 安徽师范大学学报, 2025, 53(5): 125-135.
[10] 和军, 李江涛. 人工智能数据风险及其治理[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2024(6): 42-51.
[11] Crandall, D.J., Backstrom, L., Cosley, D., Suri, S., Huttenlocher, D. and Kleinberg, J. (2010) Inferring Social Ties from Geographic Coincidences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22436-22441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Bleier, A. and Eisenbeiss, M. (2015) Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where. Marketing Science, 34, 669-688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. (2009) Predicting Social Security Numbers from Public Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10975-10980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Rafieian, O. and Yoganarasimhan, H. (2020) Targeting and Privacy in Mobile Advertising. Marketing Science, 40, 193-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 黄蒙苏. AI大模型训练数据的版权风险与治理路径[J]. 湖北大学学报, 2025, 52(5): 185-193.
[16] 刘裕, 周毅, 农顔清. 网络信息服务平台用户个人信息安全风险及其治理——基于 117个APP 隐私政策文本的内容分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 33-43.
[17] 阮荣彬, 陈菀. 企业科技向善: 内涵、量表开发与检验[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(3): 511-520.
[18] Boivie, S., Withers, M.C., Graffin, S.D. and Corley, K.G. (2021) Corporate Directors’ Implicit Theories of the Roles and Duties of Boards. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 1662-1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Koppenjan, J.F.M. and Klijn, E.H. (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. Routledge.
[20] 张新宝. 个人信息收集: 告知同意原则适用的限制[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(6): 1-20.
[21] Tang, C.M. (2022) Privacy Protection Dilemma and Improved Algorithm Construction Based on Deep Learning in the Era of AI. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 贺小石. 大数据背景下公民信息安全保障体系构建——兼论隐私政策的规制原理及其本土化议题[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2021(6): 100-109.
[23] 张海柱. 新兴科技风险、责任伦理与国家监管——以人类基因编辑风险为例[J]. 人文杂志, 2021(8): 114-121.
[24] 任蓉. 算法嵌入政府治理的风险及其防控[J]. 电子政务, 2021(7): 31-41.
[25] 张勇, 冯明显. 数据安全刑事合规的责任伦理[J]. 河南社会科学, 2022, 30(8): 105-114.
[26] Wang, C., Zhang, J., Lassi, N. and Zhang, X. (2022) Privacy Protection in Using Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Chinese Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Healthcare, 10, Article 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Saltz, J.S. and Dewar, N. (2019) Data Science Ethical Considerations: A Systematic Literature Review and Proposed Project Framework. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 197-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Buhmann, A. and Fieseler, C. (2022) Deep Learning Meets Deep Democracy: Deliberative Governance and Responsible Innovation in Artificial Intelligence. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33, 146-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 梅傲, 李坤佳. 日本数据安全治理制度述评及其启示[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(7): 195-200.
[30] 宋保振. 数字时代信息公平失衡的类型化规制[J]. 法治研究, 2021(6): 80-92.
[31] 丁晓东. 个人信息私法保护的困境与出路[J]. 法学研究, 2018(6): 195.
[32] 蒋都都, 杨解君. 大数据时代的信息公益诉讼探讨——以公众的个人信息保护为聚焦[J]. 广西社会科学, 2019(5): 107-115.
[33] 陈奇伟, 聂琳峰. 技术+法律: 区块链时代个人信息权的法律保护[J]. 江西社会科学, 2020, 40(6): 166-175.
[34] [德]马克斯·韦伯. 学术与政治[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1998: 116.
[35] Raab, C.D. (2020) Information Privacy, Impact Assessment, and the Place of Ethics. Computer Law & Security Review, 37, Article 105404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef