基于CiteSpace的生态系统服务与人类福祉的关系研究
Research on the Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being Based on CiteSpace
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2025.1512356, PDF,   
作者: 王 琰：重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院，重庆
关键词: 生态系统服务；人类福祉；CiteSpace；研究现状；热点趋势；Ecosystem Services； Human Well-Being； CiteSpace； Research Status； Hot Trend
摘要: 本研究运用CiteSpace对2006~2023年CNKI与WOS数据库中生态系统服务与人类福祉文献进行计量分析。结果揭示：(1) 该领域仍处于过渡阶段，国内外文献总量均相对有限，但国际研究(WOS)呈现阶段性爆发增长，国内研究(CNKI)增长态势平缓且波动显著；(2) 核心研究力量呈现“本土化集聚–国际化扩散”的差异特征，国内以中国科学院系统与北京大学为核心形成闭环合作网络，国际则以跨国高校联盟为主体构建开放协作体系；(3) 研究热点聚焦方向存在分异，国内侧重“价值评估–生态补偿”的应用导向研究，国际侧“生物多样性保护–生态系统韧性”的理论导向研究；(4) 研究方法与尺度层面，国内外均呈现从定性描述向定量模拟的转型趋势，但国际研究在跨尺度整合模型与跨学科方法融合上更具优势。本研究通过厘清领域知识基础与发展瓶颈，为未来开展多尺度、跨学科的生态系统服务–人类福祉耦合机制研究提供方法论参考与学术路径指引。
Abstract: This study employed CiteSpace to conduct a quantitative analysis of literature from the CNKI and Web of Science (WOS) databases concerning ecosystem services and human well-being between 2006 and 2023. The results revealed that: (1) The field remains in a developmental phase, with a relatively limited body of literature both domestically (China) and internationally. However, international research (WOS) has experienced periods of rapid growth, whereas domestic research (CNKI) has exhibited a more gradual growth trend with significant fluctuations. (2) The core research groups demonstrate distinct characteristics, with a pattern of “localized concentration domestically and international diffusion globally.” In China, a collaborative network has formed, centered around the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Peking University, creating a relatively closed loop. In contrast, international research is characterized by an open collaborative system primarily composed of multinational university alliances. (3) Research priorities differ, with a domestic focus on application-oriented studies such as “value assessment and ecological compensation,” and an international emphasis on theoretical explorations like “biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience.” (4) Regarding research methods and scales, a shift from qualitative description to quantitative simulation is evident both domestically and internationally. However, international research holds a comparative advantage in integrating models across different scales and combining interdisciplinary methodologies. By clarifying the intellectual foundations and current challenges within the field, this study provides methodological and conceptual guidance for future research on the interrelationships between ecosystem services and human well-being across multiple scales and disciplines.
文章引用：王琰. 基于CiteSpace的生态系统服务与人类福祉的关系研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2025, 15(12): 265-278. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2025.1512356

参考文献

[1] Postel, S., Bawa, K., Kaufman, L., et al. (2012) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press.
[2] Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997) The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., et al. (2009) Modeling Multiple Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity Conservation, Commodity Production, and Tradeoffs at Landscape Scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 4-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., et al. (2017) Twenty Years of Ecosystem Services: How Far Have We Come and How Far Do We Still Need to Go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 辛琨, 肖笃宁. 生态系统服务功能研究简述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2000(S1): 21-23.
[6] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.
[7] 高月明, 吴文俊, 蒋洪强, 等. 基于全球陆地生态系统的水源涵养服务价值时空变化分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(11): 2696-2705.
[8] 张莉金, 白羽萍, 胡业翠, 等. 不同SSP-RCP情景下中国生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(2): 510-521.
[9] 孙张涛, 余正伟, 舒思齐, 等. 中国省域生态系统服务价值评价与生态地质调查工作建议[J]. 中国地质, 2023, 50(2): 479-494.
[10] 邬紫荆, 曾辉. 基于Meta分析的中国森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14): 5533-5545.
[11] 沈若兰, 肖桂荣. 武夷山国家公园生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态科学, 2023, 42(2): 58-65.
[12] 高帆, 彭祚登, 徐鹏. 1977-2018 年贵州省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态科学, 2022, 41(4): 181.
[13] 孙中元, 官静, 曹蓉芬, 等. 基于ArcGIS的烟台市森林生态系统积累营养物质功能评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(1): 156-162.
[14] Shen, J., Li, S., Liang, Z., Wang, Y. and Sun, F. (2021) Research Progress and Prospect for the Relationships between Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands. Journal of Natural Resources, 36, 1909-1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 毛萍, 赵鹤凌, 张轶佳, 等. 生态环境中的人类福祉研究热点问题分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2022, 44(6): 799-812.
[16] Hagerty, M.R., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A.L., Land, K., Michalos, A.C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001) Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 71, 58-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Diener, E. (2012) New Findings and Future Directions for Subjective Well-Being Research. American Psychologist, 67, 590-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Smith, L.M., Case, J.L., Smith, H.M., Harwell, L.C. and Summers, J.K. (2013) Relating Ecoystem Services to Domains of Human Well-Being: Foundation for a U.S. Index. Ecological Indicators, 28, 79-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 黄甘霖, 姜亚琼, 刘志锋, 等. 人类福祉研究进展——基于可持续科学视角[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23): 7519-7527.
[20] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[21] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
[22] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.
[23] Li, J., Jiang, M., Pei, J., Fang, C., Li, B. and Nie, M. (2023) Convergence of Carbon Sink Magnitude and Water Table Depth in Global Wetlands. Ecology Letters, 26, 797-804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 王良杰, 马帅, 许稼昌, 等. 基于生态系统服务权衡的优先保护区选取研究——以南方丘陵山地带为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 1716-1727.
[25] 周瑞娇, 张虹, 钱敏. 近30年三峡库区生态系统服务流时空演变与影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 876.
[26] Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R.T., Molnár, Z., et al. (2018) Assessing Nature’s Contributions to People. Science, 359, 270-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 靳诚, 陆玉麒. 我国生态产品价值实现研究的回顾与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 207-213.
[28] 王晓峰, 吕一河, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务与生态安全[J]. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5): 273-298.
[29] Rockström, J., Norström, A.V., Matthews, N., Biggs, R., Folke, C., Harikishun, A., et al. (2023) Shaping a Resilient Future in Response to Covid-19. Nature Sustainability, 6, 897-907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Pyšek, P., Hulme, P.E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T.M., Carlton, J.T., et al. (2020) Scientists’ Warning on Invasive Alien Species. Biological Reviews, 95, 1511-1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 曹云, 孙应龙, 姜月清, 等. 黄河流域净生态系统生产力的时空分异特征及其驱动因子分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2101.
[32] Caro, C., Marques, J.C., Cunha, P.P. and Teixeira, Z. (2020) Ecosystem Services as a Resilience Descriptor in Habitat Risk Assessment Using the InVEST Model. Ecological Indicators, 115, Article ID: 106426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐