在线开放课程学习者黏性评估模型构建与学习者黏性提升路径分析
Evaluation Model Construction and Enhancing Pathway Analysis of Learner Stickiness in Open Online Courses
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.14121139, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王勃然, 李 钥：东北大学外国语学院，辽宁 沈阳
关键词: 在线开放课程；学习者黏性；评估模型；Open Online Courses； Learner Stickiness； Evaluation Model
摘要: 研究基于文献阅读和德尔菲法，利用两门国家一流本科课程的后台日志与在线问卷进行大样本量化分析，尝试构建和验证了一个整合性的在线开放课程学习者黏性评估模型，明确了各维度权重。通过半结构化访谈与模糊集定性比较分析，提炼了学习者黏性提升的组态路径，提出了“行为–情感–设计–平台–制度”五维协同的学习者黏性提升路径。
Abstract: Based on literature review and the Delphi method, this study employs large-sample quantitative analysis using backend logs from two National First-Class Undergraduate Courses and online questionnaires to construct and validate an integrated evaluation model for learner stickiness in open online courses. The weights of various dimensions within the model were clearly defined. Through semi-structured interviews and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), configurational pathways for enhancing learner stickiness were identified. Ultimately, a five-dimensional synergistic framework including behavior, emotion, design, platform, and institution was proposed to improve learner stickiness.
文章引用：王勃然, 李钥. 在线开放课程学习者黏性评估模型构建与学习者黏性提升路径分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(12): 689-698. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.14121139

参考文献

[1] Beddoe-Stephens, P. (1999) Yahoo: Gettin’ Sticky with It. Wired News.
[2] Davenport, T.H. (2000) Sticky Business. CIO Magazine, 13, 58-60.
[3] Hallowell, R. (1996) The Relationships of Customer Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty, and Profitability: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7, 27-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Tsao, W. (2014) Enhancing Competitive Advantages: The Contribution of Mediator and Moderator on Stickiness in the Line. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 933-941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 杨冠淳, 卢向华. 促进用户粘性的虚拟社区技术与管理设计创新[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2009, 21(5): 29-37.
[6] 王海萍. 在线消费者粘性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2009.
[7] Oliver, R.L. (1980) A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Kizilcec, R.F. and Halawa, S. (2015) Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Vancouver, 14-18 March 2015, 57-66. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2724680 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Poellhuber, B., Anderson, T., & Roy, N. (2011). Distance Students’ Readiness for Social Media and Collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 102-125.
[12] Oakley, B.A., Poole, D. and Nestor, M. (2016) Creating a Sticky MOOC. Online Learning, 20, 13-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] 钱英. 在线学习用户持续使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 现代情报, 2015, 35(3): 50-56.
[14] 杨根福. MOOC用户持续使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(1): 100-111.
[15] 李爱霞. MOOC学习者粘性影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017.
[16] 陈彦君. 社会性交互对MOOC学习者粘性影响的实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2018.
[17] 殷悦, 谢璟玥, 赵晨醒, 姜贺. 医学生慕课学习者粘性现状调查及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2021, 35(2): 167-171.
[18] 王勃然, 刘梦迪. 外语类慕课学习者黏性评估模型的构建研究——基于社会建构主义视角[J]. 外语教育研究, 2023, 11(3): 1-9.
[19] Chen, L. and Jing, Y. (2021) Social Presence and Emotional Attachment: An Empirical Study on User Stickiness in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research, 43, 55-67.

为你推荐